1 / 46

LTER-Europe – interim check before the big endspurt...

LTER-Europe – interim check before the big endspurt. ILTER. LTER-Europe Regional Group at ILTER, SK 5th LTER-Europe NNRC, 18th Aug 2008 Michael Mirtl (UBA). PART A. MONDAY 18th, 10:30-17:30. Who are WE? Bodies of LTER-Europe. National Networks Representatives Conference (NNRC).

gaille
Télécharger la présentation

LTER-Europe – interim check before the big endspurt...

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LTER-Europe –interim check before the big endspurt... ILTER LTER-Europe Regional Group at ILTER, SK5th LTER-Europe NNRC, 18th Aug 2008Michael Mirtl (UBA)

  2. PART A MONDAY 18th, 10:30-17:30

  3. Who are WE? Bodies of LTER-Europe National Networks Representatives Conference (NNRC) Scientific Site Co-ordinatorConference (SSCC) Co-ordinating Committee (CC) Structure? Governance? EC

  4. LTER-Europe: Main fields of activity This meeting: selection of issues relevant for National Networks: • Information • Decisions • Planning • Division of tasks • Resulting ToDo-list

  5. Taking up the thread... • All documents and products of Sevilla/Donana and the processes since then:http://www.lter-spain.net/lter-europe/products.htm • 4 sections •  switch to WEB browser

  6. By the end of the MONDAY (4th NNRC, Sevilla) •  We survived •  Bylaws adopted •  Status of national networks assessed (implementation, activity) •  Mind map of national networks checked •  First level criteria for LTER-Europe members adopted •  Editorial groups for Letters of Support & Commitment •  Overview of strategic environm. of LTER-Europe achieved •  Priority workflows for LTER-Europe adopted (incl. proj.proposals) • Agreed structure of the WEB site and national informations •  Standard observations/parameter: agreed list for further specification by SSCC and following national review •  Expert group: LTER-Europe research agenda • List of responsibles for the interface with other networks •  Adopted working plan 2008 (as nat. netwerks concerned) •  40 filled individual brainstormings(conference questionnairs)

  7. Background documents (printouts in LTER-Europe regional group folder) • Agenda • Minutes of the 4th LTER-Europe NNRC (Sevilla) • Protocol of the 2nd LTER-Europe SSCC (Donana) • 5th NNRC conference questionnaire • LTER-Europe 2007/2008: Extract of ALTER-Net annual report • Bylaws, version 9: results of final checks

  8. Some highlights • Participation statistics of this meeting: 14/16/18/43 • Ecoinformatics confernece (EEA, US-EPA) & Interface with SEIS • LifeWatch start-up • LTEM and LTER • EEA • IM • ALTER-NAC, EC review • LTER process, • LTSER • Planning meeting in Rome • Interface with UNECE/BR (Sept. 08) • DivEurope • Spain, Portugal (quality!) • Bulgaria

  9. 2008 LTER-Europe: January 2008 Lobbying initiated Discussion started First concepts Network implementation Formal ILTER member ALTER-I3/ M. Mirtl

  10. 2008 LTER-Europe: August 2008 Lobbying initiated Discussion started First concepts Network implementation Formal ILTER member ALTER-I3/ M. Mirtl

  11. How far have we gone from the starting point?

  12. 1a: National meetings outcome • SEE QUESTIONNAIRE and..... • Who has designated SSC for his sites? • Who is able to send his SSC to one annual meeting? • feedback European coverage • feedback standard observations • Announcement: best examples report • Announcement: best practice report • Announcement: next meeting (date)

  13. 1: Will & Reality Answers from Sevilla NNRC questionnaire (2008-01) Available information to LTER-Europe EC (2008-08)Qualified feed-back to questions: zero

  14. 1: Another interesting result with regard to the LTER-Europe management plan... Answers from Sevilla NNRC questionnaire (2008-01)

  15. 2: Completion of the LTER Infobase • Delivered national updates (4!) • Constraints in efforts to centrally fill the ILTER site database with European data • Further discussion & decisions under • item 7 (European ecological ontology; Peterseil) • item 15 (ToDo-lists for NN)

  16. 3: LTER-Europe 6th NNRC & 3rd SSCC, Dec. 2008 • December 1-5, 2008 (Monday-Friday) • Palma de Mallorca • RIU Palace Bonanza Playa • Target groups • National reps & deputies • Site coordinators • Platform managers • Co-ordinators of scientific project proposals (LTSER, IDR) • Key people involved in the LTSER concept development • ALTER-Net expert groups fitting into the LTER-Europe expert panels

  17. 3: LTER-Europe Dec.2008: Venue „RIU Palace Bonanza Playa“, Palma de Mallorca

  18. Communication Technology Info Managem. Res.Agenda Harmonisation LTSER Site-Manag Structure of SSC Conferences ? Scientific LTER Conf. NNRCCC Plenary Plenary Plenary Plenary 3: Basic structure

  19. 3: Program overview • Program: • Open space: Scientific projects meet site/platform responsibles (1 day) • LTSER focus (1 day) • Scientific strategy (0,5 day) • NNRC (1 day) • Excursion (0,5 day) • LTER core group (1 day)

  20. 3: Development of LTER/LTSER projects • Format: open space • Invitations/announcements • EURECO (folder in the conference map) • EC web site • National ecological societies (request for spreading the information) • LTER National Networks!! • Other aspects/ideas: • Possible continuation of ALARM projects with LTER in place of FSN • xxx • xxx

  21. 3: LTSER-focus • LTSER expert panel needs to fill that with live • Furman, Singh, Fischer, Krauze, Mirtl • Contributions from LTSER management & training workshop (October, Zdenka) • Links with IDR goal of ALTER-Net • Workshop in October (18-22) in Edinburgh • Contents • Conceptual state of the art • Proof of concpets (LTSER Projects) • Lessons learned from LTSER platform implementations • Required frame (funding, organisation of the science area)

  22. 3: NNRC (National Net Reps Conference) • Key notes • EC: further expectations from LTER • LifeWatch: LTER as a component of the European observatories infrastructure • EEA/UNECE: coupling with environmental monitoring • Ramsar – possible cooperation and networking experience • Status of NNs and reports • Strategic partnerships • Established and required partnerships • Priorisation of interfaces • Funding mechanisms • LTER-Europe secreatariat • Membership dues?

  23. 3: LTER core group • Work package I3 meeting • Wrapping up • Division of tasks • Editorial work on LTER-Europe management plan

  24. 3: Preparation • MM: preparatory trip/ negotiations with hotels • Local travel agency • ? Donana team • Who else? DISCUSSION AND FURTHER BRAINSTORMING IN THE END TO BE ABLE TO INCLUDE IDEAS FROM THE MEETING

  25. 4, 5, 6, 7 • 4: "LTER-Europe best examples book" and "LTER-Europe best practice guidelines" (s. emails sent by K. Krauze) • 5: Experiences with the Multi-site trampling experiment (MSE) and the 2008 vegetation re-survey work (Klotz; Parr/Groner) • 6: Status of the Meta-analysis to test the hypothesis about changes in community composition (Groner/Krauze) • 7: European ecological ontology (SERONTO) and how to contribute to the global ontology process (Peterseil), including LTER Infobase and reporting discipline

  26. 8: Update on level of activity of NNs • Intended to be a brief evaluation of the filled questionnaires • Main messages now in Flip charts filled in the beginning

  27. 9-12 • 9: Key note presentation by RO “Starting to organize the national LTERs in complyance with the structures of LTER-Europe” (Vadineanu) • 10: WEB site presentation (Krauze/ Mirtl) • 11: Logo discussion & decision (Krauze) • 12: LTER-projects: proposals, initiatives, ideas...: Life+/DivEurope (Petriccione)

  28. 13: Lifewatch is... • is a formal network of networks • network of observatories (“sites”) from different realms (marine, terrestric, aquatic) • will promote a network of data producers and collections • has a focus on data management and provision • will provide access to distributed data sources, also building on GBIF • will provide analytical and modeling tools PLUS computational capacity • develop infrastructure for improved biodiversity and ecosystem research • will – as also for the other planned large European infrastructures - mainly be based on joint national funding in accordance with LifeWatch concepts • depends on the lobbying for national LifeWatch networks and their consideration in the respective national ESFRI road maps • will estimate the realistic costs and work on a legal framework enabling all the above • 9 work packages, complex structure, comprising national networks and topical networks (ALTER, MARBEF) represented in the policy and science board

  29. 13: Lifewatch needs use cases... • What do potential clients of LifeWatch expect ofLifeWach products and services in the mid- and long term? (e.g.: what data search, access and analytical support should LifeWatch have enabled? For what purposes?) • What infrastructural and technical framework shall LifeWatch have conceptualized (pilot phase) and implemented (after 2010)? • What interaction between the networked elements and their data/knowledge shall be enabled?

  30. 13: LifeWatch & LTER on the national level... • Significant overlap with the national mind maps of LTER (as recently updated at the LTER conference in Spain) • Most of these national LifeWatch consortia are currently established • Might be highly synergistic if the national LTER representatives contacted the LifeWatch responsibles in their countries • List of national LifeWatch contacts will be provided • The implementation of LifeWatch will mainly be realised through national fundings according to concepts developed on the European level • For that reason it is crucial to achieve a good recognition and consideration of LifeWatch in the national ESFRI roadmaps as ESFRI projects are competing amongst each other – a clear incentive to join forces with all other LifeWatch relevant actors in your countries.

  31. 14:UNESCO/BiosphereReserves – LTER: Brainstorming on interface UNESCO/BiosphereReserves – LTER: • preparatory action for the complementary exercise in the ILTER part (strategic partnerships) (Mirtl)

  32. 15: ToDo List for National Networks (NN) • All national meetings 2008 before ILTER conf • Fill the draft of the “questionnaire” or better standard LTER-Europe national report BEFORE Mallorca2008 PLUS evaluate the standard report itself • Feedback on European coverage of LTER (LTER-SER) • Feedback on proposed standard observations • Secure national contributions to “Best examples report” • Secure national contributions to “Best practice manual” • WEB sites • Check and comment on draft LTER-Europe WEB site in the one-week testing time (will be duely announced) • National WEB sites to which the LTER-Europe WEB site can link (smooth hand-over point, considering whats already on the LTER-Europe WEB site) • Provide appropriate references • News, events and projects that should be put on the WEB site • Designated SSC for all sites • Next LTER-conference (1-5 December) • Beyond March 2009: • Who is able to send his SSC to one annual meeting? • Who can host the LTER-Europe conference 2009 (8th NNRC)

  33. 15: Proposed issues that should not be touched by next NN meetings • LTER-Europe criteria • LTER-Europe bylaws

  34. 16: Beyond 2009-03 • 16.1 LTER-Europen conference 2009: • when? (later in the year, as we will meet 2009-03 at the final ALTER conference), • where? • 16.2 LTER-Europe management plan • draft to be finished asap an circulated for comments • well elaborated draft to be worked on in Mallorca 2008-12

  35. 17: Other business: Necessary clarifications • OPEN (t. b. put in next questionnaire): Role of NNRs in the communication • Should information in any case go through the NNRs to avoid gaps and delays in the updating of mailing lists on the European level • Should this happen in parallel? • How to deal with feed-backs from the community (through NNRs, directly to LTER-Europe, in parallel)? • DECIDED: How to organize national reporting/ feed-backs? • Questionnaire with standard questions on issues relevant for LTER-Europe and onging processes (PLUS: changes in time traceable) • Indiv. reports • Aditional: Oral reporting

  36. 17: Other issues: Critical points I • LTER-Europe process needs more engaged AND ACTIVELY CONTRIBUTING people (bigger core group rather than a few key persons)

  37. 17: Critical questions I • WHY DO WE EXIST AS INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS? • What is the main purpose of LTER-Europe and ILTER from your very national perspective? • Central services are not used (see also: ALTER WEB site) • There are hardly any multi-site projects (difficult to establish, even if pushed and financed...): Why? • Do we need an umbrella to do/continue our small projects at small sites with a few people? (but may be with a broader horizon and a bit differently, which makes the big difference)

  38. Postponed for an ad hoc meeting later in the week • 1-hour session on best examples book, focussing on the European dimension and brainstorming [item 4] • Agree on timeplan containing the national activities as decided by the 5th NNRC (10 min in above session) [item 15] • Voting for LTER-Europe logo (ticks on printouts on the wall: 1 per country) [item 11] • Quick vote on the final changes of the bylaws [item 1] • LTER-Europe IT and information management issues [item 7]

  39. LTER-Europe –interim check before the big endspurt... ILTER LTER-Europe Regional Group at ILTER, SK5th LTER-Europe NNRC, 18th Aug 2008Michael Mirtl (UBA)

  40. PART B TUESDAY 19th, 18:30-19:30

  41. Items which need to be finished • 4: "LTER-Europe best examples book" and "LTER-Europe best practice guidelines" (s. emails sent by K. Krauze) • 7: European ecological ontology (SERONTO) and how to contribute to the global ontology process (Peterseil), including LTER Infobase and reporting discipline • 11: Logo results of voting • 12: LTER-projects: announcement of meeting: Life+/DivEurope group: 21:15 in lobby • 14: Brainstorming on interface UNESCO/BiosphereReserves – LTER: • 15: ToDo List for National Networks (NN) and timeplan • 17: Other business: • communication paths • substantial contributions to the intense working phase until March 2009

  42. 17/1: Other business: Necessary clarifications • OPEN (t. b. put in next questionnaire): Role of NNRs in the communication • Should information in any case go through the NNRs to avoid gaps and delays in the updating of mailing lists on the European level • Should this happen in parallel? • How to deal with feed-backs from the community (through NNRs, directly to LTER-Europe, in parallel)?

  43. 17/2: Other business: Involvement in LTER core team until March 2009 • Preparation of LTER-conference in Mallorca • Open space event: „Science meets sites“ • LTSER-day • Best examples book • Best practice manual • LTER-Europe management plan • Core team meetings

  44. To end with the positive: Some highlights! • Participation statistics of this meeting: • 14 formal members (1 passed vote in addition) • 18 members by the end of the weeks (16 present) • 9 countries from former west, 9 from former central/east • 43 participants from Europe!! • Ecoinformatics confernece (EEA, US-EPA) & Interface with SEIS • LifeWatch start-up • LTEM and LTER • EEA • IM • ALTER-NAC, EC review • LTER process, • LTSER • Planning meeting in Rome • Interface with UNECE/BR (Sept. 08) • DivEurope • Spain, Portugal (quality!) • Bulgaria

  45. 7 2 4 1 11: Logo: 15 votes

  46. 11: Logo 1

More Related