1 / 14

AHRC Research Fellowships

Phil Ward Research Funding Manager October 2009. AHRC Research Fellowships. Background. AHRC Established as AHRB in 1998 Became a Council in 2005 ‘Individual Scholarship’ Previously covered by ‘Research Leave’ Scheme Most popular of AHRC’s schemes But outlived its usefulness?

galeno
Télécharger la présentation

AHRC Research Fellowships

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phil Ward Research Funding Manager October 2009 AHRC Research Fellowships

  2. Background • AHRC • Established as AHRB in 1998 • Became a Council in 2005 • ‘Individual Scholarship’ • Previously covered by ‘Research Leave’ Scheme • Most popular of AHRC’s schemes • But outlived its usefulness? • Originally intended to encourage participation • But funding work which should come under block grant • High level of non-completion • Need to be distinctive from BA, Leverhulme and others • AHRC more strategic than AHRB • Review 2007-08: ‘Individual Scholarship Working Group’ • Considered several options, including early career fellowships, travelling fellowships, research development grants, research completion grants • Consultation meetings broadly encouraged a more flexible scheme

  3. Fellowship Scheme - Introduction • Announced in Jan 2009 • Same funding as for RLS: £8m • Last RLS March 2009 (NB Success rate 19%) • Guidance published end of May • JeS form available mid-June; open deadline from 1 Sept • First Fellowships due to start in autumn 2010

  4. Fellowship Scheme – Basic Details • Up to £120,000 (100% FEC) • Flexibility, to cover 50-100% of time • 3 - 9 months • A route for early career researchers, to incl. mentoring and career development support • Submit anytime • Assessment 30 weeks • Earliest start date 9 months after submission • No later than 18 months after submission • 4 panel meetings a year; budget split equally

  5. Fellowship Scheme – Early Career • Same upper limit and duration and assessment time • But can also request ‘mentor’ costs • Success rate ‘slightly higher’ than standard route • But funding not ringfenced • Aim ‘to work in partnership with institutions to support career development’ • ‘mentor statement’ • Eligibility: • NB Funding Guide wrong: don’t have to have completed probationary period • <8 yrs of the award of PhD or equivalent, or: • <6 yrs of first appointment • >1 yr post doc experience

  6. Fellowship Scheme – More Detail • Your time: • Can’t do teaching/admin during funded Fellowship • but can do some pg supervision • Can support a wide range of activities • As long as they ‘lead to significant specified research and other outputs’ by end of award period • Research should be at ‘well-developed stage’ • Should not be ‘new’ research • Should include communication/dissemination plans • Need to demonstrate ‘institutional commitment’ • HoD statement saying your fellowship would fit with HEI/Dept research strategy • What support there is for individual • eg travel grants, network costs, training, mentoring, linked institutional leave, etc • Important criterion

  7. Review – New Panels • No standing peer review panels • Now 4 ‘ad-hoc’ panels (A-D) meeting quarterly • Membership taken from Peer Review College • Approx 12, chaired by more experienced member • Each application has two ‘introducers’ • Panel don’t assess, but moderate between reviews • Final grade based on reviews & PI response • Reviews/response much more important • Min 3 reviews • Quality of reviews checked • PI given more response time

  8. Review – New Panels • Panel A: • History, Law, Philosophy, Theology, Divinity and Religious Studies • Panel B: • Architecture, Community Arts (including Art and Health), Cultural Policy & Arts Management, Creative Writing, Dance Studies, Design, Drama and Theatre studies, Media, Music, Visual Arts • Panel C: • Arts History, Conservation of Art and Textiles, Dictionaries and Databases, Cultural Geography, Archaeology, Classics, Librarianship, Information & Museum Studies • Panel D: • Journalism, Media and Communication Studies, American Studies, Cultural Studies and Popular Culture, Gender and Sexuality, Life writing, Literary and Cultural Theory, Post-Colonial Studies, Textual editing and Bibliography, English Language and Literature, Linguistics, Modern Languages

  9. Review - Grading • new grading scale of 6 (best) to 1 • 6 – It should be funded as a matter of the very highest priority • 5 - It should be funded as a matter of priority, but does not merit the very highest priority rating • 4 - It is suitable for funding • 3 - It is not recommended for funding • 2 - It is not suitable for funding (inconsistent quality) • 1 - It is not suitable for funding (unsatisfactory level of originality, quality and significance) • funding line should fall within the ‘5’ category

  10. Review - Sifting • Stage 1 (after submission): • Applicant must be eligible, • Application must be eligible, and meet aims & objectives of the scheme • Stage 2 (after review): application rejected if 2 or more reviews of grade 1-3

  11. Looking Forward • Budget Cuts • £106m cut to RCUK, to be “re-invested to support key areas of economic potential” • ‘Emerging Challenges’ • Connected Communities • AHRC ‘will undertake a leadership role’ • Food Security • Fostering Recovery & Enhancing Resilience • Change of CEO • Prof Rick Rylance started in September • ‘Future Directions for Arts & Humanities Research’ • Consultation

  12. ‘Future Directions for Arts & Humanities Research’ • ‘Arts & Humanities Research Landscape’ • Discussion paper • Looked at • Strategic: ‘leadership role’ • Interdisciplinary • Impact • International collaborations • Public understanding • Early career support – postdocs • Knowledge transfer • ‘large facilities’ funding? • Closed in May; ‘Themes’ identified • Further consultation in August • Themes identified: • Digital Humanities • Translating Cultures • Care for the Future • Art of Science: Knowledge & Creativity

  13. In Summary: AHRC increasingly strategic • ‘Leader’ of sector • Identify themes, advocate on behalf of community • Responding to govt • ‘Impact’ more and more important • Policy priorities • Wanting to be like other RCs • Adopting systems used by them • ‘team’ research • Schemes for every stage of career • Managed Programmes

  14. Sources of Information • AHRC Funding Guide: • http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/FundingOpportunities/Documents/Research%20Funding%20Guide.pdf • Fellowship FAQs: • http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/FundingOpportunities/Documents/Fellowships%20Q%20and%20A.pdf • Fellowships: • Standard: http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/FundingOpportunities/Pages/Fellowships.aspx • Early Career: http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/FundingOpportunities/Pages/Fellowshipserc.aspx • JeS Form: https://je-s.rcuk.ac.uk/Jes2WebLoginSite/login.aspx

More Related