1 / 26

Use of Lidar for estimating Reference Emission Level in Nepal

Use of Lidar for estimating Reference Emission Level in Nepal. S.K. Gautam DFRS, Nepal. Introduction: Study Area. Nepal’s ER-Program covers 12 jurisdictional Terai districts out of 75 districts of the country;

garciaa
Télécharger la présentation

Use of Lidar for estimating Reference Emission Level in Nepal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Use of Lidar for estimating Reference Emission Level in Nepal S.K. GautamDFRS, Nepal

  2. Introduction: Study Area • Nepal’s ER-Program covers 12 jurisdictional Terai districts out of 75 districts of the country; • Total area under the ER-Program is 2.3 million ha (about 15% of the country); • About 52% of the ER-Program area (1.18 million ha) is under different types of forest cover. • The area islinked with eleven trans-boundary protected areas across Nepal and India and is home to flagship species like tigers, rhinos, Asiatic wild elephants, and many other endangered species. • Total population of the ER-Program area is 7.35 million and constitute about 27% of total population (2011 population census)

  3. Introduction: LAMP • Samples (5%) of LiDAR data to • calibrate satellite models; • Reference field sample plots to calibrate/validate LiDAR models; • Landsat satellite imagery forwall-to-wall biomass map.

  4. LiDAR block design • Stratificationfrom a Landsat-based forest classification map. • Weight calculated for every block as a product of the importance of the forest types and the inverse of the forest types area. • The forest classification was used as a priori information to calculate weighting function for random block and systematic plot design. • 5 km x 10 km systematic grid over the study area where ew is the expert weight and A is the area

  5. LiDAR block design Forest type map with forest type weights. The larger weights are with brighter tones in gray-scale. Black = zero weight (non-forest).

  6. Basics of a REDD+ RL • The basic math is: • Activity Data (ha change/year) × Emissions Factors (tCO2/ha) = tCO2/year • Activity data is be based on satellite information (past) or assumptions (future) • Emissions factors are based on field measurements and allometric equations

  7. Activity Data • Defines forest/non-forest for 1999 inception date of RL with 1998 Topographic basemaps • Utilizes satellite analysis for 1999, 2001, 2006, 2009 and 2011 to delineate structural classes of intact, degraded and deforested • Bases classification on fractional image indexes (i.e., % vegetation) and temporal analysis drawing on work by leader in the field Carlos Souza of Brazil • Develops land cover change matrix by tracking changes between the different structural classes between 4 time-periods

  8. Emissions Factors • DFRS, FRA, Arbonaut and WWF collaborate in collection of LiDAR data covering 5% of TAL program area in 2011 • Field plots collected in 2011 (738 calibration plots) and 2013 (46 validation plots) • Uses allometric equations of Sharma and Pukkala (1990) to estimate biomass for ground plots (same equations used by FRA)

  9. Emissions Factors • Model to correlate LiDAR-based above-ground biomass estimates for each forest condition (intact, deforested, degraded and regeneration) and forest type (Sal, Sal mixed, Other mixed and Riverine) • IPCC default values used to calculate mean carbon density for regeneration and below-ground carbon based on biomass estimates

  10. Method: LAMP Workflow

  11. Results: Historical CO2 emissions Average annual net CO2 emissions (tCO2e) in TAL between 1999 and 2011.

  12. Results: Historical Carbon Stock Loss

  13. Accuracy assessment • a) Comparison to independent field plots • b) Leave-one-out validation LAMP model (Landsat) LiDAR model Estimated biomass (t/ha) R2 = 0.52 R2 = 0.92 Field-measured biomass (t/ha)

  14. Emissions reduction targets

  15. Endorsed by the FCPF

  16. Research & Development: AGB in 2010

  17. Research & Development: AGB in 1999

  18. Research and Development: Difference in AGB between 1999-2011

  19. Costs and Future Monitoring • The cost of this project is USD 0.28/ha • Our experience shows that 1-2% LiDAR coverage is sufficient for this integrated approach • But LiDAR is needed only once • Subsequent monitoring is based on new satellite images to which the LAMP models are applied

  20. Basic image processing steps in ImgTools

  21. Decision Tree and Definition of Forest for Terai Arc Landscape

  22. Forest types and conditions map • Four major forest types: 1) Sal forest, 2) Sal dominated mixed forest, 3) other than Sal dominated forest (i.e. “other forest”) and 4) Riverine. • The four forest types were overlaid on the forest structural map (Joshi et al. 2003) to generate forest types and conditions maps for each time period. • The study assumed forest types do not change from one type to another type (i.e., from Sal forest to mixed forest or riverine forest or vice versa) in 10-20 years;

  23. Thank You

More Related