1 / 46

Channel Estimation

Channel Estimation. 2012/08/13 蒲俊瑋. Outline. Introduction Channel Estimation Techniques in OFDM Systems LS Channel Estimation Linear Interpolation Channel Estimation MMSE Channel Estimation MLS Channel Estimation Pilot Arrangement in OFDM Systems and Decision-Feedback Channel Estimation

garciamargaret
Télécharger la présentation

Channel Estimation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Channel Estimation 2012/08/13 蒲俊瑋

  2. Outline • Introduction • Channel Estimation Techniques in OFDM Systems • LS Channel Estimation • Linear Interpolation Channel Estimation • MMSE Channel Estimation • MLS Channel Estimation • Pilot Arrangement in OFDM Systems and Decision-Feedback Channel Estimation • Channel Equalization in Timing Varying Channel

  3. Introduction

  4. Small Scale Fading • Multi-path channel

  5. Channel Impulse Response • A mobile radio channel may be modeled as a linear filter with a time varying impulse response, where the time variation is due to receiver motion in space. • The filtering nature of the channel is caused by the summation of amplitudes and delays of the multiple arriving waves at any instant of time.

  6. Channel Impulse Response

  7. The Multi-Path Channel Effect • The multi-path channel effect EX: Data = [1 2 3 4] Channel = [1 1] y = 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 = 1 3 5 7 4 path1 path2 • 2 3 4 • 1 2 3 4

  8. The Matrix Form of Channel • The wireless stationary channel impulse response is given by , where L is the total number of resolvable paths. • We assume that each tap of the channel impulse responses , , are independently distributed complex Gaussian random variables with zero-mean and variance .

  9. The Matrix Form of Channel • The matrix G is constructed as follows: EX: Data = [1 2 3 4] Channel = [1 1]

  10. The Matrix Form of Channel • The matrix is constructed as follows: CP

  11. The Matrix Form of Channel • Furthermore, a circular convolution matrix can be obtained:

  12. The Transmitted OFDM Signal • After the inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) operation, the ith transmitted OFDM symbol in time domain can be expressed by: where and are an vector and an matrix standing for modulated symbols and an IDFT matrix.

  13. The Received CP-OFDM Symbol • Assuming the synchronization is perfect and CP is adopted, the received ith OFDM symbol can be expressed as: where denotes the circular convolution and denotes the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) vector in the time domain with zero mean and variance . We note that there is no ICI and ISI in each OFDM symbol.

  14. The Received CP-OFDM Symbol • After DFT operation, the ith received OFDM symbol in the frequency domain can be expressed as: where is the AWGN in the frequency domain and H is a N × N diagonal matrix denoting the channel response in frequency domain.

  15. The Received CP-OFDM Symbol • Any circular matrix can be diagonalized by DFT matrix: • The received signal can be expressed as:

  16. Channel Estimation Techniques in OFDM Systems

  17. Introduction • In general, channel estimation can be cataloged into three kinds of estimation schemes: 1. Blind 2. Superimposed 3. Pilot-based • The first two structures can obtain some bandwidth merit, but the computational complexity is usually not acceptable in practical realization.

  18. Introduction • The pilot-based estimation can be cataloged into two kinds of approaches: 1. The parameters are deterministic but unknown constant, such as maximum likelihood (ML) estimator and least square (LS) estimator. 2. The parameters are random variables, such as minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimator and maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimator.

  19. System architecture

  20. System architecture Input to Time Domain 1 2 3 Guard Interval Channel 4 5 Guard Removal Output to Frequency Domain 6 Channel 7 Estimated Channel Output ICI AWGN Channel Estimation

  21. System Model • Generally, the pilot symbols are multiplexed into an OFDM symbol in frequency domain: • In addition, the power allocation of data and pilot symbols are given by: ρ: Total Power β: Power Allocation Factor N: Number of Subcarriers

  22. System Model • If system is perfectly synchronized, and the CP is added and removed appropriately, there is no ISI and inter-carrier interference (ICI). As a result, the ith received OFDM symbol after DFT can be expressed as: where is a diagonal channel matrix with the kth element standing for the channel frequency response of the kth sub-carrier and W is a complex white Gaussian noise vector with covariance matrix .

  23. The LS Channel Estimator • Define , where denotes the received pilot signal. • The channel estimator based on the LS method is given by: where denotes a diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements are given by

  24. Linear and Second Order Interpolation • Linear Interpolation • Second Order Interpolation [1-2]

  25. Linear Interpolation Estimated Channel (Channel + Noise)’s Upper Bound Real Channel Pilot Subcarrier (Channel + Noise)’s Lower Bound Data Subcarrier Frequency Domain

  26. The MMSE Channel Estimator • The MMSE channel estimator is given by [3, 4] where represents the cross-correlation between all the subcarriers and the pilot subcarriers, and represents the autocorrelation matrix between the pilot subcarriers.

  27. The Low-Rank MMSE Channel Estimator • A low-rank MMSE channel estimator is given by [1]: where is a diagonal matrix with entries • Note that can be viewed as the attenuation of the lth tap of the channel impulse response: and c can be expressed as [3]:

  28. The Realization of MMSE Channel Estimator • In practice, the channel power of the lth transform coefficient can be obtained from the results of the LS channel estimation. • First, the estimate of the channel impulse response can be acquired by taking the IDFT of the channel frequency response obtained from the LS channel estimate: • And then the is obtained.

  29. The Modified LS (MLS) Channel Estimator • The modified LS (MLS) channel estimator is given by where is a diagonal matrix. The entries of are: • The MLS channel estimator can be considered as a low-pass filter, which is also termed as DFT-based scheme.

  30. Pilot Arrangement in OFDM Systems [2] and Decision-Feedback Channel Estimation

  31. Introduction • The channel estimation can be performed by either inserting pilot tones into all of the subcarriers of OFDM symbols with a specific period (block type) or inserting pilot tones into each OFDM symbol (comb type). Comb TypeBlock Type Freq. Time

  32. LTE Reference Symbol Arrangement • LTE pilot symbol arrangement 1 2

  33. Band Edge Virtual subcarriers Virtual subcarriers DC f Active Band … … … … Pilot Data

  34. Decision-Feedback Channel Estimation • When the channel is slow fading, the channel estimation inside the block can be updated using the decision feedback equalizer at each sub-carrier. • Decision Directed Channel Estimation (DDCE) is one of the earliest methods studied for OFDM, mainly because of its popularity in legacy systems. In the earlier studies, DDCE was applied mostly in training based systems.

  35. Decision-Feedback Channel Estimation • The main idea behind DDCE is to use the channel estimation of a previous OFDM symbol for the data detection of the current estimation, and thereafter using the newly detected data for the estimation of the current channel. • For fast fading, the comb-type estimation performs much better.

  36. OFDM Systems in Time-Variant Multipath Channels

  37. Introduction • Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) is generally known as an effective technique for high bit rate applications such as DAB, DVB and WiMAX, since it can prevent intersymbol interference (ISI) by inserting a guard interval and can mitigate frequency selectivity of a multipath channel using a simple one-tap equalizer.

  38. Introduction • In an OFDM system, although the degree of channel variation over the sampling period becomes smaller as data rates increase, the time variation of a fading channel over an OFDM block period causes a loss of subchannel orthogonality, resulting in an error floor that increases with the Doppler frequency. • The performance degradation due to the interchannel interference (ICI) becomes significant as the carrier frequency, block size, and vehicle velocity increase.

  39. Block Diagram for An OFDM System • The time-domain transmitted signal is given by • The time-domain received signal is then given by

  40. ICI Analysis • The frequency-domain received signal is then given by where denotes the frequency-domain noise and represents the FFT of timing-variant channel, i.e.,

  41. ICI Analysis • In the general case where the multipath channel cannot be regarded as time-invariant during a block period, the received signal can be expressed in vector form as where , , and with

  42. Channel Equalization • After performing channel equalization, the equalized signal can be expressed as where • The inverse operation increases the system computation complexity.

  43. Conclusions • Assuming that the channel is stationary over the period of an OFDM symbol, the conventional frequency-domain equalizer with one-tap in an OFDM system compensates the frequency-selectivity of a multipath fading channel. • The one-tap frequency-domain equalizer cannot eliminate ICI for the case of a time-varying channel. • In time-varying channel, the computation complexity of the frequency-domain equalizer is increased.

  44. References • [1] Sinem Coleri, Mustafa Ergen, Anuj Puri, and Ahmad Bahai, “Channel Estimation Techniques Based on Pilot Arrangement in OFDM Systems,”IEEE transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. 48, No. 3, September 2002. • [2] G.-S. Liu and C.-H. Wei, “A new variable fractional sample delay filter with nonlinear interpolation,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems-11: Anulog andDigiral Signal Processing, vol. 39, no. 2, Feb. 1992. • [3] O. Edfors, M. Sandell, J.-J. van de Beek, S. K. Wilson, and P. O. Borjesson, “OFDM Channel Estimation by Singular Value Decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 931-939, Jul. 1998. • [4] S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 380-382.

  45. Appendix A. LMMSE estimator

  46. Appendix A. LMMSE estimator

More Related