1.01k likes | 1.5k Vues
IENG 471 Facilities Planning Dr. Frank Joseph Matejcik. 10/3: Chapter Six LAYOUT PLANNING MODELS AND DESIGN ALGORITHMS. South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City . 6.1 Introduction. Block layout as opposed to detailed layout Handling best is less
E N D
IENG 471 Facilities Planning Dr. Frank Joseph Matejcik 10/3: Chapter Six LAYOUT PLANNING MODELS AND DESIGN ALGORITHMS South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City
6.1 Introduction • Block layout as opposed to detailed layout • Handling best is less • Material handling or layout first? Both
6.1 Introduction • following affect layout • 1. Centralized versus decentralized storage of work-in-process (WIP), tooling, and supplies • 2. Fixed-path versus variable-path handling • 3. The handling unit planned for the systems • 4. The degree of automation used in handling • 5. The type of level of inventory control, physical control, and computer control of materials
6.2 Basic Layout Types (4 types) • Product large, stable demand for a standardized product like an engine block, often a production line • Fixed materials location low sporadic demand awkward to move, aircraft fuselage • Product family (group technology) medium demand for a medium number of similar components. Similar components form groups.
6.2 Basic Layout Types (4 types) • Process planning combination of workstations containing “similar” processes are metal cutting departments, gear cutting departments, and hobbing departments • The difficulty in defining process departments is in the interpretation of the word “similar.”
6.3 Layout Procedures • Apple's Plant Layout Procedure • 1. Procure the basic data. • 2. Analyze the basic data. • 3. Design the productive process. • 4. Plan the material flow pattern. • 5. Consider the general material handling plan. • 6. Calculate equipment requirements. • 7. Plan individual workstations. • 8. Select specific material handling equipment
6.3 Layout Procedures • Apple's Plant Layout Procedure • 9. Coordinate groups of related operations. • 10. Design activity interrelationships. • 11. Determine storage requirements. • 12. Plan service and auxiliary activities. • 13. Determine space requirements. • 14. Allocate activities to total space. • 15. Consider building types. • 16. Construct master layout.
6.3 Layout Procedures • Apple's Plant Layout Procedure • 17. Evaluate, adjust, and check the layout with the appropriate persons. • 18. Obtain approvals. • 19. Install the layout. • 20. Follow up on implementation of the layout.
6.3 Layout Procedures • Reed's Plant Layout Procedure • 1. Analyze the product or products to be produced. • 2. Determine the process required to manufacture the product. • 3. Prepare layout planning charts. • 4. Determine workstations. • 5. Analyze storage area requirements.
6.3 Layout Procedures • Reed's Plant Layout Procedure • 6. Establish minimum aisle widths. • 7. Establish office requirements. • 8. Consider personnel facilities and services. • 9. Survey plant services. • 10.Provide for future expansion. • Most important part is the Layout planning chart (Figure 6.2)
Layout Planning Chart • Most important phase (Reed) • Incorporates • Flow process • Standard times for each operation • Machine selection and balance • Manpower selection and balance • Material handling requirements
Layout Procedures • Construction Type • Improvement Types • Algorithms • Relationship diagramming • Pairwise exchange method • Graph-based construction method
Facility Layout Once we have determined a new location for our facility, we wish to design an optimal configuration for the layout of departments. Suppose we have the following:
Relationship Chart 4 =Very Important 2 = Useful 3 = Important 1 = Not very useful
1 Nodal Representation Idea: Start with most valuable department first and begin building other departments around it. Departments in order 1 - 2 - 6 - 7 - 3 -4 - 5 Ties are broken arbitrarily. Add Production
1 2 Nodal Rep. (cont) Department 2, Warehouse, is next most important so we add it next. It has a relationship value of 4 with production. Continue adding Departments in order of importance.
1 2 6 Nodal Rep. (cont.) Add 6, support
7 1 2 6 Nodal Rep. (cont.) Add 7, shipping
7 4 1 2 6 Nodal Rep. (cont.) Add 4, toolroom
7 4 1 2 3 6 Nodal Rep. (cont.) Add 3, office
7 4 1 2 5 3 6 Nodal Rep. (cont.) Add , 5 Food Service
7 4 1 2 5 3 6 Nodal Rep. (cont.) Nodal Clean-up
Block Calculations Idea: Add Blocks pretty much in same manner as nodal representation
7 7 4 1 2 4 1 2 5 3 3 6 5 6 Nodal to Block Representation
7 7 4 4 1 2 1 2 3 3 5 6 5 6 Nodal to Block Representation Initial Layout
7 4 1 2 3 6 5 Layout Evaluation Idea: Compute the rectilinear distance between departments and multiply by the relationship chart; e.g. Distance = 3
Evaluation (cont.) Total Effectiveness = 108 Idea: Try new layout and search for lower effectiveness score
6.4 Algorithmic Approaches • Human judgment is still required • Generally need computer implementation • Outgrowth of university research • Commercial packages • emphasize layout evaluation or • presentation (CAD Tools)
Algorithmic Classification • Use from to chart and/or relationship chart • Problems become increasingly difficult as size increases. Limited approaches may be used. • Multiple Objective functions are used
Algorithmic ClassificationMultiple Objectives • cij cost of unit flow/unit distance • dij distance, fij flow, xij adjacent 1, else 0 • distance based objective • adjacency based objective • relatively efficiency