1 / 23

B. Overview of Orestes Code: Laser physics simulation model.

B. Overview of Orestes Code: Laser physics simulation model. Physics:. e-beam: ionization and excitation from Boltzmann analysis plasma: 1D axially resolved, separate electron and gas temperatures kinetics: 24 species, 122 reactions, Includes KrF vibrational structure

gaura
Télécharger la présentation

B. Overview of Orestes Code: Laser physics simulation model.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. B. Overview of Orestes Code: Laser physics simulation model. Physics: e-beam: ionization and excitation from Boltzmann analysis plasma: 1D axially resolved, separate electron and gas temperatures kinetics: 24 species, 122 reactions, Includes KrF vibrational structure lasing and ASE: 3D, discrete ordinates, time dependent, ASE gain narrowing Objectives: system scaling, pulse shaping, improve efficiency Accomplishments: validated code design analysis for Electra

  2. Multi-species plasma chemistry for KrF kinetics

  3. Small Signal Gain Measurement(February 26, 2003) L = 95 cm Tw=.64 Tw=.64 0.91” dia. I0 305i Ii PD1 2 in. Cal L =20 cm L =20 cm Experimental Results (2in. Cal): Input 3.5 mV Output 940 mV Input 1.08 mV Output 850 mV Lower Input Output 640 mV No Input Output 640 mV

  4. Small Signal Gain Results Iout/Iin=e^(gl) Assumption 4: The intensity stays below the saturation intensity!! Case 1: 4.7%/cm Iin ~47 kW/cm^2 Iout ~4.1 MW/cm^2 Case 2: 5.5 %/cm Iin ~16 kW/cm^2 Iout ~3.1 MW/cm^2 If saturation intensity ~1.5 MW/cm^2 then Assumption 4 invalid Full Rigrod Analysis needed Helpful Comparison to Garpun Differences 100 cm E-beam Garpun used 95 cm E-beam Electra With Garpun graph Electra small signal gain greater than 7%/cm

  5. Time Response of Oscillator at Various Fluorine Concentrations 0.25%F2, 39.75% Kr, 60% Ar 0.7%F2 39.3% Kr 60% Ar 0.1%F2, 39.9% Kr, 60% Ar

More Related