1 / 18

Workshop on Assessing Building Damage in Algeria, 2003

Learn how to quantify impacts of hazards on housing and infrastructure. Explore phases of assessment and differences in building damage. Understand macro assessment and damage categories.

gentile
Télécharger la présentation

Workshop on Assessing Building Damage in Algeria, 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessing building damage • 189 Algeria, 2003 This workshop will look at how to quantify the impacts of different hazards upon housing and infrastructure

  2. Workshopobjectives ! • The key learning objectives of this workshop are to form an • understanding of and share experience on : • Presentation: phases of assessment • Workshop: differences in building damage

  3. Handover from SAR teams B A E C D Search And Rescue teams use standard marking systems: A – name of team, date, time of visit/work B – types of risks encountered W water Gas gas leakage Chem chemical products EXPL explosive materials F fuels or other inflammable materials electricity risk of collapse radioactivity C – number of dead D – number of people unaccounted for E – number of people saved

  4. Macro assessment of entire affected area Handbook for Estimating the Socio-Economic and Environmental Effects of Disasters (ECLAC and the World Bank, 2003) Damages must be assessed at a national level in order to inform: 1. strategic, programme and project planning 2. appeals processes 3. understandings of impacts upon the national and regional economy and environment Governments may agree an approach to macro assessment: following the Indian Ocean tsunami of 26 December 2004, a Tsunami Recovery Impact Assessment and Monitoring System (TRIAMS) was discussed and endorsed by the Global Consortium for Tsunami-Affected Countries IFIs have their own approaches to damage and loss measurement: the World Bank has used the methodology for disaster damage and loss assessment developed by the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (UN-ECLAC), common in that region since 1972

  5. Housing damages categories The categories of damage presented below have been used following conflicts to describe damage to housing, supported by 1-page rapid village and rapid housing assessment forms. Similar categories may be agreed following conflicts and disasters. Different categories may be developed for different building types. Category 0 Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 No damage Minor damage, assistance required Partial damage, can be repaired Severe damage, can be repaired Destroyed, cannot be repaired

  6. Factors influencing levels of damage • The type and scale of damage to buildings depend upon a number • of factors: • 1. hazard: different damage from different hazard • 2. intensity: different damage from different intensity • 3. vulnerability: different damage from vulnerability • 4. buildings: different damage from different buildings • 5. zones: different damage from different zones

  7. Workshop groups Key point Each group will be allocated one of the factors and will discuss how the damage levels change with: Group 1: differenthazards Group 2: differentintensities Group 3: differentvulnerabilities Group 4: differentbuildings Group 5: differentzones Discussion in groups Each group agrees a key point

  8. Group 1 key point: different hazards Key point Question: How does the damage level change with different hazards? Group 1 shares one key point with the other groups

  9. Different damage from different hazards Each different hazard has its own different patterns: • Conflicts: • low-intensity conflicts and civil disturbances • high-intensity conflicts • Earthquakes may have 3 different directions of • motion: • vertical motion • horizontal motion • vertical and horizontal motion simultaneously • Floods may be: • fast-onset • slow-onset

  10. Group 2 key point: different intensity Key point Question: How does the damage level change with different intensity? Group 2 shares one key point with the other groups

  11. Different damage from intensities • Disasters have different intensities, measured with scales, such as: • earthquakes: (the Richter scale, 1-10, is now almost obsolete) • ModifiedMercalli intensity scale, 1-12, quantifies effects on the Earth's surface, humans, objects of nature, and structures, eg • Intensity 11, ‘Very Disastrous’: few, if any masonry structures remain standing; bridges destroyed; rails bent greatly • tornadoes: Fujita scale or Fujita-Pearson scale, 0-5 (6 levels) is based on damage to structures and vegetation, eg: • Intensity 4, ‘Devastating Damage’: 333–418 km/h; well-constructed houses levelled; structures with weak foundations blown away some distance; cars thrown and large missiles generated.The Enhanced Fujita Scale, which has been introduced in the USA, adds new construction methods • hurricanes: Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale, 1-5, is used for most Western Hemisphere tropical cyclones that exceed the intensities of tropical depressions and tropical storms, eg • Intensity 4: 210–249 km/h winds; 4.0–5.5 metres storm surge

  12. Group3keypoint:differentvulnerabilities Key point Question: How does the damage level change with different vulnerability? Group 3 shares one key point with the other groups

  13. Different damage from vulnerabilities • The population will be affected differently depending on their • social and economic status. • The more vulnerable groups are: • populations living in high-risk locations • populations living in poor-quality buildings • These vulnerable groups are most likely to be or become: • displaced populations • marginal groups • low-income populations • urban populations • Higher-income groups may be at greater risk if they adopt • new building technologies that do not incorporate traditional • hazard resistant design.

  14. Group 4 key point: different buildings Key point Question: How does the damage level change for different buildings? Group 4 shares one key point with the other groups

  15. Different damage for different buildings • Different types of buildings will be damaged differently by the same • disaster: • poorly-built apartments blocks may be more vulnerable to earthquakes than houses with traditional seismically resistant design • schools may be less damaged than housing if they are built to higher-standards by government contractors following enforced building codes • older building may be damaged differently from newer building due to different construction, materials and techniques

  16. Group 5 key point: different zones Key point Question: How does the damage level change with different zones? Group 5 shares one key point with the other groups

  17. Different damage from different zones • Within a disaster affected area, there will be different levels of • damage which may be categorised into different zones, with an • epicentre where the damage is greatest: • the zones of damage will describe the vulnerability of the location and the vulnerability of the buildings • zones may be highly-localised, for example in a flood where one street is damaged while the next street is not, because it is on high-ground • zones of damage approximate to a hazard map, which may be used for future disaster risk reduction and preparedness Transitional settlement and reconstruction after natural disasters (United Nations, 2008)

  18. Bibliography Handbook for Estimating the Socio-Economic and Environmental Effects of Disasters (UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) and the World Bank, 2003) Transitional settlement and reconstruction after natural disasters(United Nations, 2008)

More Related