1 / 30

CVPR 2006 Highlights

Posters. Talks. World Cup. CVPR 2006 Highlights. Vaibhav Vaish. New York University, June 17-22. Conference Statistics. 318 papers (28% acceptance) 54 oral presentations (4.7%) 1136 submissions 30 area chairs, 560 reviewers ≈ 1200 attendees (30% increase) Free dinner on last day.

geoffrey
Télécharger la présentation

CVPR 2006 Highlights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Posters Talks World Cup CVPR 2006 Highlights Vaibhav Vaish New York University, June 17-22

  2. Conference Statistics • 318 papers (28% acceptance) • 54 oral presentations (4.7%) • 1136 submissions • 30 area chairs, 560 reviewers • ≈ 1200 attendees (30% increase) • Free dinner on last day

  3. Awards • Honored 5 “champion reviewers” • Best Paper: Putting Objects in Perspective D. Hoiem, A. Efros, M. Herbert Honorable mention: Incremental Learning of Object Detectors Using a Visual Shape Alphabet A. Opelt, A. Pinz, A. Zisserman • Best Poster: TBA.

  4. Longuet-Higgins Prize (CVPR 96) Neural Network-Based Face Detection H. Rowley, S. Baluja, T. Kanade Combining Greyvalue Invariants with Local Constraints for Object Recognition C. Schmid, R. Mohr

  5. Workshop Highlights • 25 Years of RANSAC • Keynote: Robert Bolles (co-inventor of RANSAC) • 2 Keynotes by Shree Nayar (PROCAMS, Medical Imaging workshop) • Projector defocus • Separating direct and indirect illumination Do NOT miss this at SIGGRAPH!

  6. Scheduling • Oral presentations recorded, broadcast live • To be put online (somewhere, sometime) Orals I 90 min Posters I 210 min Posters 2 210 min Time Orals 2 90 min

  7. Papers I Liked • Papers from Stanford • Fun with digital photos and video • Computational imaging and sensors • Why Bill Gates is rich • Obituary: 3D Reconstruction • “Visual words” for recognition

  8. Papers from Stanford • A Dynamic Bayesian Network Model for Autonomous 3D Reconstruction from a Single Indoor Image • E. Delage, H. Lee, Andrew Ng • Learning Object Shape: From Drawings to Images • G. Elidan, Geremy Heitz, Daphne Koller • Object Pose Detection in Range Scan Data • Jim Rodgers, Dragomir Anguelov, H Pang, Daphne Koller • A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Algorithms • S. Seitz, B. Curless, J. Diebel, D. Scharstein, R. Szeliski • Reconstructing Occluded Surfaces … blah

  9. Papers from Stanford • A Dynamic Bayesian Network Model for Autonomous 3D Reconstruction from a Single Indoor Image • E. Delage, H. Lee, Andrew Ng • Learning Object Shape: From Drawings to Images • G. Elidan, Geremy Heitz, Daphne Koller • Object Pose Detection in Range Scan Data • Jim Rodgers, Dragomir Anguelov, H Pang, Daphne Koller • A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Algorithms • S. Seitz, B. Curless, J. Diebel, D. Scharstein, R. Szeliski • Reconstructing Occluded Surfaces … blah

  10. Papers I Liked • Papers from Stanford • Fun with digital photos and video • Computational imaging and sensors • Obituary: 3D Reconstruction • “Visual words” for recognition

  11. Making a Long Video Short:Dynamic Video Synopsis A. Rav-Acha, Yael Pritch, Shmuel Peleg. • Video Summary • Short • Informative • Accurate • Seamless

  12. Making a Long Video Short:Dynamic Video Synopsis A. Rav-Acha, Yael Pritch, Shmuel Peleg. Input Video Summary Video More demos …

  13. Making a Long Video Short:Dynamic Video Synopsis • Find regions of “activity” • Compute summary using MRF optimization

  14. What Makes A High Quality Photo ? • The Design of High-Level Features for Photo Quality Assessment • Yan Ke, Xiaoou Tang, Feng Jing

  15. Some Ranking Results Error rate (snapshot vs professional): 24%

  16. What Makes A High Quality Photo ? • Pros vs Point-and-shooters • Simplicity • (Sur)realism • Basic Technique • Features (a subset) • Lack of blur • Spatial edge distribution • Color, brightness, contrast, hue count • Learn from http://DPChallenge.com

  17. Picture Collage J Wang, J Sun, L Quan, Xiaoou Tang, H Shum

  18. Picture Collage • Maximize “informative regions”, minimize blank space • Optimize using random grid sampling (Bayesian framework)

  19. Papers I Liked • Papers from Stanford • Fun with digital photos and video • Computational imaging and sensors • Why Bill Gates is rich • Obituary: 3D Reconstruction • “Visual words” for recognition

  20. CVPR 2005 System Bilayer Segmentation of Live Video A. Criminisi, G. Cross, A. Blake, V. Kolmogorov Link • Goals: • Single camera • Real-time (no optic flow!) • Good looking results

  21. How it works • Priors, priors, priors and priors • Temporal continuity • Spatial coherence • Color likelihood • Motion likelihood • Learning • Fast approximate binary graph cut

  22. A Closed Form Solution to Natural Image Matting Anat Levin, Dani Lischinski, Yair Weiss • Idea: in a small window, colors lie on a line in color space • Find alpha by minimizing αT L α • Eigenvectors of L suggest good scribbles

  23. Lensless Imaging with a Controllable Aperture Assaf Zomet, Shree Nayar

  24. Other Papers • Instant 3Descatter • Tali Treibitz, Yoav Schechner • Blind Haze Separation • S Shwartz, E Namer, Yoav Schechner • Space-time Video Montage • H Kang, Y Matsuhita, Xiaoou Tang, Xue-Quan Chen

  25. Papers I Liked • Papers from Stanford • Fun with digital photos and video • Computational imaging and sensors • Obituary: 3D Reconstruction • “Visual words” for recognition

  26. Multi-View Stereo Evaluation S. Seitz, B. Curless, J Diebel, D Scharstein, R Szeliski http://vision.middlebury.edu/mview

  27. Multi-View Stereo Taxonomy • Scene representation • Photo-consistency measure • Visibility model • Shape prior • Reconstruction algorithm • Initialization

  28. Multi-View Stereo Evaluation • Metrics • Accuracy • Completeness • Running time • Renderings • Conclusions • Most work pretty well • Having lots of views enables simpler algorithms [Multi-view Stereo Revisited, Goesele et al]

  29. Upcoming Deadlines • December 3rd, 2006. • CVPR 2007, Minneapolis • March 2007 • ICCV 2007, Rio de Janeiro • CVPR 2008 in Anchorage, Alaska

More Related