1 / 12

Leading a Course Review

This document outlines the processes involved in the annual course review (ACR) and how key performance indicators are interpreted to assess and enhance course effectiveness. Collaboration with course teams is essential for identifying strengths and improvement areas using various metrics such as the Graduate Destination Survey, Course Experience Questionnaire, and overall satisfaction scores. A robust course review policy driven by LTPF indicators ensures data-driven strategies for maintaining high standards and addressing challenges. The importance of thorough analysis and reporting for continuous improvement is emphasized.

gerry
Télécharger la présentation

Leading a Course Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Leading a Course Review

  2. Summary Evaluation of Second Module

  3. Outcomes • Interpret key performance indicators for annual course review (ACR) • Work with course team to identify course strengths and devise strategies to maintain them • Work with course team to identify course areas for improvement and devise strategies to address them

  4. Learning & Teaching Performance Fund (LTPF) • Graduate Destination Survey (GDS) • FT employment • FT/PT further study • Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) • Good Teaching Scale (GTS) • Generic Skills Scale (GSS) • Overall Satisfaction Item (OSI) • Student Progress Rates (pass rates) • Student Retention Rates • Commencing • Total

  5. LTPF Results • 2006 - 24/38 • 2007 – 20 • 2008 - ?

  6. LTPF – Comparative Outcomes 2007 to 2008 (-) No change; () improved against 2007; () declined against 2007

  7. The Need for Course Review! • AUQA Cycle 1 Recommendation • Course Review Policy developed by a working party based on LTPF indicators and eVALUate • Endorsed by UAB Dec 2006 for implementation in 2007 • Data readily available through Planning and Quality Information Reportal at http://planning.curtin.edu.au/reportal/index.html

  8. Task • In groups of 4, review the course data and prepare an ACR Report • Use Tables 1 – 19 in Bachelor of Example • Additional Course Summary Report • Additional Distribution of Scores Report

More Related