1 / 23

Urticaria/Angioedema - Management

Urticaria/Angioedema - Management. David M. Lang, MD Head, Allergy/Immunology Section Respiratory Institute Cleveland Clinic. Disclaimer.

gianna
Télécharger la présentation

Urticaria/Angioedema - Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Urticaria/Angioedema - Management David M. Lang, MD Head, Allergy/Immunology Section Respiratory Institute Cleveland Clinic

  2. Disclaimer • I have received honoraria from, have carried out clinical research with, and/or have served as a consultant for:, Genentech/Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Hycor, Merck, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering/Key. • My presentation will include discussion of off-label uses of a number of FDA approved products, but not agents that are not FDA-approved.

  3. Disclaimer • Updated Urticaria/Angioedema parameter in preparation. • Workgroup • Chair: Jonathan Bernstein, MD • Liaison: David Lang, MD • Members: • Timothy Craig, DO • David Dreyfus, MD • David Khan, MD • Javed Sheikh, MD • David Weldon, MD • Bruce Zuraw, MD

  4. Learning Objective • Describe evidence-based management of patients with chronic urticaria/angioedema

  5. H-1 AntihistaminesHigh Quality Evidence • Preferred 1st line therapy for patients with chronic urticaria/angioedema. • H1-antihistamines efficacious in numerous published RCTs since 1950s. • 1st generation agents associated with risk for sedation and anti-cholinergic effects • 2nd generation agents also efficacious and in many patients are better tolerated Strong Recommendation

  6. Efficacy of Doxepin Compared with Diphenhydramine * * * p < .001 Green SL, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985 12: 669-75

  7. Dose Advancement of 2nd Generation Antihistamines • 80 patients with refractory urticaria, 72% previously treated with steroids • Randomized to antihistamine, with dose advancement to 4x standard dose • Goal = symptom free (13 at 5 mg vs. 28 at higher dose, p = 0.02, X2) Number of patients symptom free Antihistamine Dose Staevska M, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125: 676-82

  8. H2 anti-histamines Anti-leukotrienes Colchicine Sulfasalazine Hydroxychloroquine Methotrexate Stanozolol IVIG Methotrexate Omalizumab Cyclosporine Others… Refractory Urticaria/Angioedema Refractory = Obstinately resistant to authority or control, unruly

  9. Antihistamines: H1 Combined with H2 • Evidence difficult to interpret • Small numbers of patients studies • Different H1 antihistamines used • Dose of H2 antihistamine variable • Cimetidine 800-1200 mg/day • One study: cimetidine 400 mg QID • Superior efficacy • Clin Allergy 8:429, 1978 • Br J Dermatol 117: 81; 1987 • No advantage • Br J Dermatol 99: 675; 1978 • Drug-Drug interaction: Hydroxyzine & Cimetidine • Simons EF, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995; 95: 685-93

  10. Anti-Leukotrienes • Montelukast/Zafirlukast/Zileuton • Substantial safety advantage compared with other “alternative” or “steroid sparing” agents • RCTs • 5: favorable • 1: no advantage • Data suggest salutary effect more likely • ASA-exacerbated urticaria/angioedema • Physical Urticaria/Angioedema • Positive Autologous Serum Skin Test Morgan M, Khan D. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 100: 403-11

  11. Methotrexate for Refractory Chronic Urticaria/Angioedema • Retrospective report, total = 88 patients, period = 2005-2009 • 8 patients receiving high dose anti-HA & oral steroids. • Response: 3 groups based on symptom severity, tx = 4.5 +/- 3 months • Complete: no symptoms, tx = MTX with/without anti-HA, no steroid • Partial:: decrease in U/A severity and/or frequency with reduction in steroid dose • No response • No serious AE’s; 1 case of mild increase in LFT, 2 cases of GI discomfort, managed with switch to IM route. Sagi L. Acta Derm Venereol 2001; 91: 303-306

  12. 21 patients with chronic urticaria/angioedema, randomized to Hydroxychloroquine (?dose) or Placebo for 12 weeks, in addition to other medications for urticaria (H1 & H2 antihistamines, doxepin, corticosteroids). Med taper q 2 weeks if well controlled; 18 completed trial, ITT analysis. RCT: Hydroxychloroquine * * * * * * p < 0.05 * p = 0.05 – 0.10 Reeves GEM, et al. Intern Med J 2004; 34: 182-6.

  13. Cyclosporine • Most extensively studied agent for treatment of refractory chronic urticaria/angioedema • May exert salutary effect via down-regulation of Th1 responses and T cell dependent antibody generation of B lymphocytes, along with inhibition of release of histamine and other mediators from mast cells and basophils Madan V, Griffiths CE. Dermatol Ther 2007; 20: 239-50.

  14. Therapeutic Utility of Cyclosporine for Refractory Chronic Urticaria/Angioedema • Case Series and Case Reports • Fradin MS, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 25: 1065-7. • Toubi E, et al. Allergy 1997; 52: 312-16. • Serhat Inaloz H, et al. J Dermatol 2008; 35: 276-82. • Subject to bias, and do not provide high quality evidence.

  15. Therapeutic Utility of Cyclosporine for Refractory Chronic Urticaria/Angioedema • PubMed Search: • “urticaria”, “cyclosporine” • Limit = RCT • 4 RCT’s • Grattan CE, et al. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143: 352-72. • Di Gioacchino M, et al. Allergy Asthma Proc 2003; 24: 285-90. • Baskan EB, et al. J Dermatolog Treat 2004; 15: 164-8. • Vena GA, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: 705-9.

  16. Therapeutic Utility of Cyclosporine for Chronic Urticaria/Angioedema • Vena GA, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: 705-9. • DBRPC study with three arms, N=99: • 16 weeks cyclosporine: 5 mg/kg tapering to 4 mg/kg, then 3 mg/kg. • 8 weeks cyclosporine • placebo • Primary outcome • Improvement in severity score

  17. Therapeutic Utility of Cyclosporine for Chronic Urticaria/Angioedema Mean Improvement in Severity Score * * * * * * * • * p< .05 • * p< .01 • Vena GA, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: 705-9.

  18. Evidence of Autoimmunity in Patients with Chronic Urticaria Kaplan A., N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 175-9.

  19. Autologous Serum Skin Test (ASST) • 3 of 4 studies enrolled only patients with positive ASST. • ASST not performed in the remaining study • Vena GA, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: 705-9. • In other published studies, results of ASST has not consistently correlated with in vitro assays and positive ASST has been observed in patients without urticaria. • Taskapan, et al. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008; 33: 754-8. • Asero, et al. Clin Exp Allergy 2004; 34: 1111-14. • The role of positive ASST in predicting salutary effect of cyclosporine is unclear.

  20. Cyclosporine • 4 RCTs in patients with chronic urticaria/angioedema • Methodologic shortcomings recognized in each study. • In the context of study limitations, potential harms and costs, the quality of evidence supporting cyclosporine administration is LOW -- leading to a WEAK RECOMMENDATION, based on current evidence. • Implies that patients in different clinical contexts, with different values or preferences, are candidates for different choices. • Encourages clinicians to be more deliberate and judicious in incorporating evidence regarding risks/benefits in the context of patient circumstances, values, and preferences to make the best management decision.

  21. Step Wise ApproachChronic Urticaria/Angioedema Step-wise= Marked by a gradual progression

  22. Step Care ApproachRefractory Chronic Urticaria/Angioedema Step-wise= Marked by a gradual progression

  23. Therapeutic Role For Anti-IgE • Open trial of omalizumab in patients “with hives present most days of the week despite antihistamines”. • 7/12 achieved complete symptom resolution. Kaplan A., et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 122: 569-73

More Related