1 / 11

BC Ministry of Health

BC Ministry of Health. NP4BC Workshop Pre-Questionnaire High Level Results. NP4BC Questionnaire. 6 Questions: What is one key thing with respect to NP integration that is working well? What is one key thing with respect to NP integration that is not working well ?

gilles
Télécharger la présentation

BC Ministry of Health

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BC Ministry of Health NP4BC Workshop Pre-Questionnaire High Level Results

  2. NP4BC Questionnaire • 6 Questions: • What is one key thing with respect to NP integration that is working well? • What is one key thing with respect to NP integration that is not working well? • What is the most important issue that needs to be addressed? • If you could make one change to NP integration, what would it be? • What would be the highest priority to accomplish over the next 6-12 months? • Purpose of Questionnaire • To provide directional information to support the development of an appropriate agenda for the October 29th session • To identify some of the key issues facing NP integration, and subsequently allow for a more efficient use of time on October 29th • Not intended to be conclusive. • 362 Respondents • 141 Nurse Practitioners • 73 Physicians who have worked with NPs • 23 Patients of NPs • 19 Physicians who have not worked with NPs • 14 NP students • 5 Specialists who have worked with NPs • 3 Specialists who have not worked with NPs • 84 “other” (or no response to profession)

  3. NP4BC Questionnaire Results • There was a relatively narrow range of response themes • Most questions had some clear themes that accounted for a vast majority of respondents’ opinions. • There are some clear areas of common ground across professions • Generally, respondents across professions identified similar issues in areas including education, funding, compensation, role clarity, collaboration, and evaluation. • The results allowed the planning committee to shape the agenda for today.

  4. NP4BC Questionnaire Results What is the most important issue to be addressed? • Professional continuing education and practice supports for NPs in the community (16%) • Provincial evaluation (13%) • Interprofessional education, practice support and training (13%) 2. NP funding mechanism (13%). What is one change you would make? • Change the funding mechanism/model/approach (30%) • Improve role clarity, understanding and/or acceptance (16%) • Improve collaboration/integration of NPs into practices, particularly with GPs (10%) What should be the highest priority for the next 6-12 months? • Funding/compensation and/or the funding mechanism (25%) • Improve role clarity, awareness, and/or acceptance of the role (12%) • Generally improve collaboration/integration of NPs into practices, particularly with GPs (10%)

  5. NP4BC Conversation Themes 5. Consultation Supports • Compensation supports to enable NP integration and other members of the multidisciplinary team • Physician’s time and support to NPs in co-developing patient care plans where patient is part of the NP panel. 6. Role Clarity • Shared understanding of NP scope of practice (uneven across contracts, populations and models) • Building awareness and understanding of what’s possible / what exists /what works/doesn’t work. 7. Integration and Collaboration • Enablers of NP integration and integrated primary and community care • Improve collaboration and integration of NPs into practices (specifically targeted to GPs) • Reporting relationships in community. 8. Access to Primary Care in Communities • Patient access to healthcare, particularly in remote communities and/or areas underserviced or not serviced by GP • NP after hours care of own patients • Business case for multidisciplinary team approach to increase primary care capacity in community. 1. Interprofessional Education • Continuing education supports for NPs and GPs and  multidisciplinary team • Ongoing inter professional curriculum development. 2. Multi-Disciplinary Practice Supports • Building capacity for change management • Provincial/regional resources and supports for change management. 3. Evaluation (Provincial / Regional / Local) • What is important to measure? What is the business case? • What are enablers of inter professional collaborative practice • Functions based review of models of care • Encounter codes and reporting by NPs as part of the multidisciplinary team • If not encounter codes then what? 4. NP Funding Model • Current provincial funding model does not incorporate overhead costs while FFS does • Operational costs, overhead/benefits, office space • Funding models that support multidisciplinary care based on population need.

  6. Appendices

  7. NP4BC Questionnaire ResultsWhat is one key thing with respect to NP integration that is working well? Raw Data Responses

  8. NP4BC Questionnaire ResultsWhat is one key thing with respect to NP integration that is NOT working well? Raw Data Responses

  9. NP4BC Questionnaire ResultsWhat is the most important issue that needs to be addressed? Raw Data Responses

  10. NP4BC Questionnaire ResultsIf you could make one change to improve NP integration, what would that be? Raw Data Responses

  11. NP4BC Questionnaire ResultsWhat would be the highest priority to accomplish over the next 6-12 months? Raw Data Responses

More Related