1 / 33

Towards Automatic Non-Deterministic Web Service Composition Markou, G. & Refanidis, I . Dept. of Applied Informa

Towards Automatic Non-Deterministic Web Service Composition Markou, G. & Refanidis, I . Dept. of Applied Informatics, University of Macedonia, Greece. In Summary. Introduction Related Work Method of Choice Use of Standards Online Evaluation Proposed Approach Evaluation

gilles
Télécharger la présentation

Towards Automatic Non-Deterministic Web Service Composition Markou, G. & Refanidis, I . Dept. of Applied Informa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Towards Automatic Non-Deterministic Web Service Composition Markou, G. & Refanidis, I. Dept. of Applied Informatics, University of Macedonia, Greece ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  2. In Summary • Introduction • Related Work • Method of Choice • Use of Standards • Online • Evaluation • Proposed Approach • Evaluation • Quantitative criteria • Use case scenarios • Conclusion • Translation between AI & Web Service languages • Manual Web Service Composition module • Automatic Web Service Composition module • Application • Registry • Web Service Editor ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  3. Introduction • Related Work • Method of Choice • Use of Standards • Online • Evaluation • Proposed Approach • Application • Registry • Web Service Editor • Translation between AI & Web Service languages • Manual Web Service Composition module • Automatic Web Service Composition module • Evaluation • Quantitative criteria • Use case scenarios • Conclusion ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  4. Motivation • Difficult to expect from a human user /experts to manually complete the goal of a Web Service Composition (WSC) • Number of Web Services (WSs) is growing continuously  discovery phase more difficult • Ever-changing environment: WSs can change interfaces or even part of their usage multiple times throughout their lifespan • Always possible that their execution is not successful ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  5. System Goals - Functionalities: • Online • Registry / Advertisement / Semantic search of Web Services • Editing of Web Services • Translation/ mapping between AI & Web Service languages • Manual Web Service composition module • Automatic Web Service composition module • Evaluation based on • Quantitative criteria • Use case scenarios ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  6. Introduction • Related Work • Method of Choice • Use of Standards • Online • Evaluation • Proposed Approach • Application • Registry • Web Service Editor • Translation between AI & Web Service languages • Manual Web Service Composition module • Automatic Web Service Composition module • Evaluation • Quantitative criteria • Use case scenarios • Conclusion ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  7. Method of Choice (1/2) • Method of choice? • Use of standards? • Most widespread: AI planning • Diverse • OWL-S / PDDL widely used • Other standards (e.g., WSMO) • Proprietary formats • Perhaps most notable is Sirin, et al. (2004) • From WSC problem (described in OWL-S) to HTN • Composite process that can be decomposed to simpler ones • Simple processes being atomic WSs • Reduces complexity of the planning process  • Cannot cope with non-determinism  • Planner-dependent  ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  8. Method of Choice (2/2) • AI planning also used in Hoffmann, et al. (2009) • Treats the application of a WS as a belief update operation • Identifies tractable special cases of WSC • Allow for a compilation into planning under uncertainty  • Subsequent use of existing conformant planner  • PDDL-like problem descriptions  • No standardized WS description  ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  9. Use of Standards • Klusch, Gerber & Schmidt (2005) and Hatzi, et al. (2011) rely on translation of OWL-S descriptions to PDDL problems  • Klusch, Gerber & Schmidt (2005): • Outputs modified PDDL files (in XML)  • Does not have evaluation on WSC problems  • Hatzi, et al. (2011) tackles uncertainty with re-planning module  • Both only address WSC problem, not other stages  ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  10. Online • YaWSA (Macdonald, 2007) • Only web-based WSC system in literature with running demo  • Only implemented a WSC process (no registry, view WSs’, etc) • No longer available for public use  • Prototype web-based WSC system described in Du, Song, and Munro (2006) • Supporting multiple phases of WSC  • Public link to running demo of their implementation is not provided  ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  11. Evaluation • Literature suggests a gap in the evaluation process of the current WSC systems • Many simply evaluate their methodology on a single case study, without referring to quantitative criteria, e.g., Chen, Xu, and Reiff-Marganiec (2009), McDermott (2002), McIlraith and Son (2002) • Notable exceptions: • Hoffmann, et al. (2009) : Two artificial benchmarks with different encodings and planners • Hatzi, et al. (2011): Single use case, with different number of WSs • Test collection combination of hand-tailored atomic WSs and entire domains of OWL-S Service Retrieval Test Collection (OWL-S TC) • Kona, et al. (2008): Three versions of a single use case, each suited for a mode of their WSC algorithm • Test collection: Modified version of the 2006 WS-Challenge ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  12. Introduction • Related Work • Method of Choice • Use of Standards • Online • Evaluation • Proposed Approach • Application • Registry • Web Service Editor • Translation between AI & Web Service languages • Manual Web Service Composition module • Automatic Web Service Composition module • Evaluation • Quantitative criteria • Use case scenarios • Conclusion ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  13. Proposed Approach - Application User email registration Based on Google Web Toolkit (GWT): Initial screen ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  14. Registry (1/2) • Core of the application is based on iServe • Open platform for publishing and discovering services • WSs are semantically described in OWL-S, not Minimal Service Model • Used its web-based application for • Browsing • Querying • Uploading services • Populated the registry with version 4.0 of OWL-S TC • Made several improvements to its interface and functionality ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  15. Registry (2/2) Web Service details Inline operations Semantic search alternatives ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  16. Proposed Approach – WS Editor XML Editor with syntax highlighting Pre-defined OWL-S templates ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  17. Translation between AI & WS Languages • AI planning language: PDDL, the de facto planning language • Specifically, NuPDDL • Compatible with PDDL2.1, retaining most of it • Capable of modeling non-deterministic action effects (one of, unknown) • WS semantic description language: OWL-S, most widely used • Heavily influenced from planning languages, such as PDDL • Partial mapping from OWL-S to PDDL exists • Part of it straightforward: • ServiceProfile input parameters  identically named ones of PDDL action • hasPrecondition/ hasEffect parameters precondition/ effect of action • Conversion of non-physical knowledge from OWL-S to PDDL problematic  Introduction of new predicate in PDDL domain? ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  18. Manual WSC Module • Under implementation • Based on PetalsBPM • Modification from BPMN 2.0 editor to suit OWL-S WSC functionalities • To be compared with automatic WSC module (ease of use, speed, etc) ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  19. Automatic WSC Module • Future work – Basic directions: • WSs may fail to execute correctly, e.g., • Unavailability of an atomic WS involved in the plan • Output of their successful execution is not the expected one • Generate plans tackling the most influential and likely contingencies • Proposed solution based on contingent planning • Produce seed plan • Examine for significant/ likely points of failure • Add conditional branches • Re-planning module will be integrated ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  20. Introduction • Related Work • Method of Choice • Use of Standards • Online • Evaluation • Proposed Approach • Application • Registry • Web Service Editor • Translation between AI & Web Service languages • Manual Web Service Composition module • Automatic Web Service Composition module • Evaluation • Quantitative criteria • Use case scenarios • Conclusion ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  21. Quantitative Criteria • Criteria to be considered: • Number of Web Services considered for WSC • Preprocessing time (parsing of ontologies’ concepts, etc) • Transformation time (of WS domain to PDDL one) • Planning time (to output a successful plan) • Optimality of the outputted plans (least WSs used to achieve the required goal) ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  22. Use Case Scenarios • Based on OWL-S TC Semantic Web Services v. 4.0 (PDDL) • Each scenario uses a subset of descriptions of an OWL-S TC domain • A few semantic WS descriptions were added for testing purposes, and some were modified • Each scenario with increasing non-determinism & complexity ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  23. Movie Database Scenario (1/2) • Movie database search using a (partial) movie title • Based on Communication domain: 58 semantic WSs in total • Fully deterministic - Serialized composite WS output • Retrieve comedy films with titles similar to user input • Output: • Movie titles • Pricing information (tax-free price, recommended price, etc) ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  24. Movie Database Scenario (2/2) Composite Web Service (created through Manual WSC module) ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  25. Online Bookstore Scenario (1/2) • Online bookstore product purchase • User wants to purchase a book from an specific online bookstore with a preferred method of payment • Preferences regarding method of payment • Based on Education domain: 285 semantic WSs in total • Non-deterministic output • Different outcomes: • Output if book in stock: • Addition of book in shopping cart • Purchase with the specified method of payment • Output information regarding it, such as its author • No output if book not in stock ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  26. Online Bookstore Scenario (2/2) Composite Web Service (created through Manual WSC module) ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  27. Camera Search Scenario (1/2) • Camera search and purchase • User want to purchase an analog SLR model; willing to settle for other ones if it is not in stock • User preference towards specific model • More than one sellers exist • Based on Economy domain: 359 semantic WSs in total • Possible iteration in output Web Service • Since more than one sellers exist, if product not available at one, check another • If product not found in any of the sellers, try with other versions (digital SLR, simple compact cameras) ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  28. Camera Search Scenario (2/2) Composite Web Service (created through Manual WSC module) ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  29. Introduction • Related Work • Method of Choice • Use of Standards • Online • Evaluation • Proposed Approach • Application • Registry • Web Service Editor • Translation between AI & Web Service languages • Manual Web Service Composition module • Automatic Web Service Composition module • Evaluation • Quantitative criteria • Use case scenarios • Conclusion ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  30. Conclusion • Current WSC approaches, in general: • Do not deal with inherent non-determinism in WSC domain • Are not online, despite WS’ use & nature being web-oriented • Do not evaluate their methodology using well defined scenarios or test sets • Improvements have been made recently • Our final system is intended to be the first online and open source system supporting multiple phases of WSC • Presented scenarios provide efficient way of evaluation • Can be used by other WSC works as a common test bed ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  31. Thank you for your attention! Questions? ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  32. Extra Slides ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

  33. References: Referenced papers: • E. Sirin, B. Parsia, D. Wu, J. Hendler, and D. Nau, “HTN planning for web service composition using SHOP2”, J. Web Semant., vol. 1, no. 4, Oct. 2004, pp. 377-396. • J. Hoffmann, P. Bertoli, M. Helmert, and M. Pistore, “Message-based web service composition, integrity constraints, and planning under uncertainty: a new connection”, J. Artif. Intell. Res, vol. 35, May 2009, pp.49-117. • M. Klusch, Α. Gerber, and M. Schmidt, “Semantic web service composition planning with OWLS-Xplan”, Proc. 1st International AAAI Fall Symposium on Agents and the Semantic Web, Nov. 2005. • O. Hatzi, D. Vrakas, M. Nikolaidou, et al., “An integrated approach to automated semantic web service composition through planning”, IEEE Trans. Service Computing, April 2011, pp. 301-308. • A. Macdonald, “Service composition with hyper-programming”. Technical Report, University of St Andrews, 2007. • X. Du, W. Song, and M. Munro, “Using common process patterns for semantic web services composition”, Proc. 15th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD’06), Sept. 2006. • K. Chen, J. Xu, and S. Reiff-Marganiec, “Markov-HTN planning approach to enhance flexibility of automatic web service composition”, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'09), July 2009, pp. 9-16. • D.V. McDermott, “Estimated-regression planning for interactions with web services”, Proc. Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS ’02), April 2002, pp. 204-211. • S. McIlraith and T. Son, “Adapting Golog for composition of semantic web services”, Proc. 8th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2002), April 2002, pp. 482-496. • S. Kona, A. Bansal, M.B. Blake, and G. Gupta, “Generalized Semantics-Based Service Composition”, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS’08), Sept. 2008. ICIW 2012 - Web Services-based Systems & Applications IV

More Related