1 / 24

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE AIRCRAFT CARRIERS OVERVIEW

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE AIRCRAFT CARRIERS OVERVIEW. PEO Carriers Overview. Total Life Cycle responsibility for all Aircraft Carrier Programs Portfolio (~$25B FY10-15)(PB 12) CVN 21 Future Carrier Program CVN 68 Class Refueling Complex Overhauls

ginger
Télécharger la présentation

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE AIRCRAFT CARRIERS OVERVIEW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE AIRCRAFT CARRIERSOVERVIEW

  2. PEO Carriers Overview • Total Life Cycle responsibility for all Aircraft Carrier Programs • Portfolio (~$25B FY10-15)(PB 12) • CVN 21 Future Carrier Program • CVN 68 Class Refueling Complex Overhauls • CVN 68 Class In-Service Carrier Maintenance and Modernization • CVN 65 Rest of Service Life and Inactivation Mission: Aircraft Carriers Ready for Tasking at Reduced Cost…

  3. Business Model PEOs A/T/W AIR 1.0 PEOs C4I • ALRE • Air Traffic Control • Flight Deck Certification • Strike Planning • Aircraft/Ship Integration • AIMD • C4ISR • Networks • Navigation • METOC • Total Ship Design & Systems Engineering • Contracting • Business & Financial Mgt • SUPSHIP Newport News • Corporate Operations PEO IWS • Ship Self Defense System • Warfare Systems Integration • Ship Construction

  4. CNO Guidance for 2011 Chief of Naval Operations, ADM Gary Roughead on the importance of Total Ownership Cost Reduction, from his “CNO Guidance for 2011, Executing the Maritime Strategy”: • “ …we are identifying areas in which we can reduce costs, streamline operations, … • “Our TOC reduction effort includes leveraging multi-year buys, engineering maintenance requirements, pursuing common designs and open architecture, and consolidating infrastructure to more efficiently and effectively run our Navy.” • “We are making TOC a part of all our decisions.” • “We will mature the process to identify, select, and fund TOC reduction initiatives …”

  5. PEO Aircraft Carriers 2011 ObjectivesAligned for Success SECNAV CNO Focus 2011 PEO Carriers 2011 Objectives • Naval Workforce • Global War on Terrorism • Navy-Marine Corps Force for Tomorrow • Emphasize Ethics & Safety • Transform DON Enterprise Management. • Facilities • Be the dominant, ready naval force across all maritime missions • Appropriate force structure and strategic laydown • Maintain decision superiority • Align requirements, resources and acquisition processes • Evolve and establish international relationships • Deliver Aircraft Carrier Current and Future Readiness to the Fleet on Time at Reduced Cost • Drive OSD (AT&L) Acquisition Efficiencies into CVN Procurement • Optimize PEO Aircraft Carriers workforce performance through professional development, recruiting, mentoring, diversity, retention, and balanced workload assignments • Lead our Government and Industry Partners, in a Collaborative Manner, to ensure Future Critical Warfighting Readiness • Reduce Total Ownership Costs through innovation & effects based thinking ASN (RD&A) * Get the requirements right * Make every dollar count * Rebuild the acquisition workforce * Be accountable for disciplined program performance * Foster a healthy industrial base NAVSEA • Build an affordable future Fleet • Sustain today’s Fleet efficiently and effectively • Enable our people • Recruiting, developing and retaining our future workforce • Building a culture that values diversity • Transitioning to a competency-aligned organization OSD (AT&L) • Deliver the warfighting capability we need for the dollars we have • Better buying power for warfighter & taxpayer • Restore affordability to defense goods & services • Improve defense industry productivity • Remove government impediments to leanness • Avoid program turbulence • Maintain a financially healthy defense industry Naval Aviation • Enterprise Culture and Communication • Readiness • People • Future Readiness

  6. In-Service Aircraft Carriers: Years of Service - ENTERPRISE will be 51 at her FY12 inactivation - NIMITZ-Class: 500 total carrier-years, serving over 84 years, from 1975 until 2059 Years of Service Life RCOH • Modernization; ac, threat, networks • TOC, O&S Reduction • Alignment of CMP with Aging Data • Inactivation Strategy / Learning

  7. Sustaining Support / Other 4% 2% Inactivation Modernization 3% Procurement 20% Depot Maintenance 22% O&I Maintenance 1% 48% Manpower NIMITZ Class TOC Baseline The big cost drivers over the 50 year life of a CVN are Manpower and Maintenance.

  8. Carrier Force Structure Sustainment JOHN F KENNEDY (CVN 79)

  9. RCOH Program Description CVNMission: To support and operate aircraft to engage in attacks on targets afloat and ashore which threaten our use of the sea and to engage in sustained operations in support of other forces. RCOH: Mid-life depot availability to accomplish reactor refueling, warfighting modernization, and repair of ship systems and infrastructure so the ship may adapt to future mission requirements and meet continued service life requirements. The RCOH program recapitalizes NIMITZ class aircraft carriers to provide for reliable operations during its remaining 23 plus years of ship life using only the normal maintenance cycle. CVN 68 Class Description: Length overall: 1092’ Beam: 134’ Displacement: 91,878 Tons Draft: 38.7’ Platforms: CVN 71 (FY09-FY13) CVN 72 (FY13-FY16) Employment: Procure and provide Aircraft Carrier Life Cycle support to enable Naval Aviation strike operations in support of Naval, Joint, and Coalition Force Operation 9

  10. RCOH Performing Activities

  11. CVN RCOH Contractors & Government Field Activities Map Bechtel Marine Propulsion Corporation (Pittsburgh, PA/Schenectaday, NY) Puget Sound Naval Shipyard(Bremerton, WA) NAWC (Lakehurst, NJ) NSWC (Carderock, MD) NAWC (Pax River, MD) NSWC (Dahlgren, VA) NNS (Newport News, VA) SUPSHIP (Newport News, VA) NSWC(Port Hueneme, CA) SPAWAR (Charleston, SC)

  12. CVN 78 Class Ship Improvements Integrated Island New Propulsion/Electric Plant Joint Precision Approach and Landing System Smaller Island Re-Positioned Aft & Outboard Mast with Clamp Antenna All Electric Aux Services New Propulsion Plants Zonal Electrical Distribution System Dual Band Radar Improved Weapon & Material Handling Advanced Weapons Elevators Heavy Underway Replenishment Enlarged Flight Deck Footprint “Pit Stop” Plasma Arc Waste Destruction System Advanced Arresting Gear Aircraft Elevators (3) Stbd Sponson Redesign Hangar Bays (2) Enhanced Flight Deck Electromagnetic Aircraft Launching System (4) Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile Underwater Protection #4 Catapult Unrestricted Enhanced Ship Self Defense Improved Survivability Projected TOC Savings $5 B

  13. Birth of CVN 78 Nov 2009 Photo by Diane Cebula, Newport News Daily Press, 15 November 2009

  14. Birth of JOHN F. KENNEDY CVN 79

  15. DBR: Key FeaturesDesigned for the 21st Century Warfighter • AAW/Self Defense • Large raids of near-term and far-term, low flying and high diving ASCM’s • Frequency diversity, bandwidth and sophisticated ECCM techniques provide a robust ECCM • ASuW • Very fast update rate with high range accuracy against surface target swarms • ASW • Periscope Detection and Discrimination, against very small periscopes with short disclosure time, AND with a very low false alarm rate. • Counterbattery • Supports Real Time Launch Point Estimates • Combat Identification • Instantaneous Range/Doppler Signature Measurement, Raid Count Estimate, Maneuver Dectection • Carrier Air Traffic Control • Safety of Flight without dedicated ATC radars • Passive Operations • Passive Search & Track at both bands during No Radiate operations • Near Zero Maintenance & Manning • No dedicated operator; Minimal hours per mission year for corrective & preventative maintenance DBR Provides An Unprecedented Capability Improvement Across Multiple Missions DBR replaces seven sensors on CVN: SPQ-9B, MK-95, SPS-67, SPS-49, SPS-48E, SPN-43, and SPS-74 (PDR)

  16. Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) • Mission: • Recover all existing and future carrier-based fixed wing air vehicles • Description: • AAG is an aircraft arrestment system designed for installation and operation aboard aircraft carriers of the United States Navy • Each ship system has eight engines that support four wire locations on the flight deck, with three wires installed at a time • Two of the wire locations will be capable of supporting barricade arrestment • Platforms: • CVN 78-class Carriers (Forward-Fit) • CVN 68- class Carriers (Potential Backfit) • Employment: • Supports CVN based aviation operations, expeditionary warfare, forward presence, power projection, sea lane and littoral zone control, reconnaissance, search and rescue, logistical and interdiction missions.

  17. Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) • EMALS is a new development system within the CVN 21 (ACAT 1D) Program • Replaces the legacy steam catapult system • EMALS System Development and Demonstration (SDD) • RDT&E Funded • EMALS SDD is under contract with GA • EMALS Procurement Strategy • All procurement is SCN funded, and provided to NGSB as GFE • CVN 78 EMALS ship set is under contract with GA • EMALS Life Cycle Support • EMALS will be managed as part of existing NAVAIR responsibility for Aircraft Launch and Recovery Equipment

  18. EMALS Contractors & Government Field Activities ContractorLocationRole Prime contractors General Atomics San Diego, CA Design and final Tupelo, MS assembly Inverters Launch Motors Subcontractors KATO Mankato, MN ESS MGs Oldenberg Group (OGI) Kingsford, MI Motor Support Structures General Tool Company (GTC) Cincinnati, OH Motor Support Structures Neeltran New Milford, CT Prime Power Interface QinetiQ Waltham, MA Control, HealthMAP Government Field Activities NAVAIR Lakehurst, NJ SDD testing Life Cycle Support

  19. EMALS Contractors & Government Field Activities Map KATO Mankato, MN Fox Valley Metal Green Bay, WI ODI Kingsford, MI CW Cheswick, PA New England Wire Lisbon, NH GTC Cincinnati, OH QinetiQ Waltham, MA HII Chatsworth, CA Draka N. Dighton, MA M&T Rialto, CA ESL Cranston, RI Cal Gasket Gardena, CA Neeltran New Milford, CT STV Douglassville, PA L-3 San Diego, CA Alion Alexandria, VA ESI San Diego, CA McGee Industries Ashton, PA NAWC Lakehurst, NJ NNS Newport News, VA Prime Contractor General Atomics San Diego,CA General Atomics Tupelo, MS Entwistle Danville, VA PCC York, PA

  20. CVN 78 TOC Reduction(Compared in constant $FY04) • Manpower reductions of 800 from ships force. New propulsion plant, EMALS, all electric systems require reduced watchstanders and reduced maintenance. Goal is 1000-1200 billet reductions. • Maintenance reductions – all electric systems, 12 year dry docking interval, reduced components/system counts Each ship in the new class will save $4.48B over its 50 year life. For 10 ships, that equates to ~$50B (in constant $FY04)

  21. CVN 78 Class Contractors and Government Field Activities

  22. CVN 78 Class Contractors & Government Field Activities Map General Electric (Lynn, MA) Electric Boat (Groton, CT) Bechtel Marine Propulsion Corporation and Bechtel Plant Machinery, Inc. (Pittsburgh, PA/ Schenectady, NY) NAWC (Lakehurst, NJ) NSWC (Carderock, MD) NAWC (Pax River, MD) Northrop Grumman (Sunnyvale, CA) NSWC (Dahlgren, VA) General Atomics (La Jolla, CA) NNS (Newport News, VA) SUPSHIP (Newport News, VA) SPAWAR (San Diego, CA) Sperry Marine Northrop Grumman (Charlottesville, VA) McDermott International (Houston, TX) B&W Nuclear Operations Group (Lynchburg, VA) Northrop Grumman (Pascagoula, MS) General Atomics (Tupelo, MS)

  23. PEO Carrier S&T Attack on Cost • Office of Naval Research, Future Naval Capabilities (FNC) • Member of the Enterprise and Platform Enablers (EPE) Working Group, championing R-”TOC Gap / Focus Area” which generates and supports long term efforts for R-TOC across multiple systems and platforms including Aircraft Carriers • Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) • Working with ONR and Centers of Excellence to promote not only acquisition cost improvements but also address R-TOC reduction opportunities through manufacturing improvements • National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP) • Representing R-TOC needs and support the shipbuilder-led projects that aid not only in ship construction but also maintenance and modernization cost reductions • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) • Working with Future and In-Service Carriers programs as well as fleet representatives developing new topics have been identified, approved and funded to address R-TOC • Rapid Technology Transition (RTT) and Technology Insertion Program for Savings (TIPS) • As part of the NAVSEA submission to ONR, Promote and support R-TOC related to topics

  24. Questions?

More Related