1 / 58

Hydrogeological Modeling of the Pullman-Moscow Basin Basalt Aquifer System, WA and ID

Hydrogeological Modeling of the Pullman-Moscow Basin Basalt Aquifer System, WA and ID. Joan Wu, Farida Leek, Kent Keller Washington State University John Bush University of Idaho. OUTLINE. Introduction Hydrogeologic Setting Methodology GIS database development Ground-water flow modeling

glenys
Télécharger la présentation

Hydrogeological Modeling of the Pullman-Moscow Basin Basalt Aquifer System, WA and ID

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hydrogeological Modeling of the Pullman-Moscow Basin Basalt Aquifer System, WA and ID Joan Wu, Farida Leek, Kent Keller Washington State University John Bush University of Idaho

  2. OUTLINE • Introduction • Hydrogeologic Setting • Methodology • GIS database development • Ground-water flow modeling • Results and Discussions • Summary • Position Announcement

  3. INTRODUCTION • The aquifer system in the CRBG is the sole water supply source for the Palouse Basin • The continuous water-level decline and the projected future development have led to serious public concerns • PBAC: a multi-stakeholder, multi-agency (city, county, university) organization promoting conservation and sound ground-water management • The 2003 MOA with PBAC: GIS database

  4. INTRODUCTION(cont’d) Past Studies on Hydrogeological Characterization • Crosby and Cavin (1960) • Foxworthy and Washburn (1963); Jones and Ross (1972) • Bush and colleagues (1998, 2000, 2001, 2003) Past Studies on Groundwater Modeling • Barker (1979), overly conservative • Lum et al. (1990), overly optimistic • Both models proved inadequate by year 2000

  5. INTRODUCTION(cont’d) Goal • To develop a foundation for improved and informed Palouse Basin groundwater resources assessment and management Objectives • To develop a hydrogeology GIS database for the Palouse Basin to improve data accessibility and data processing and analysis efficiency • To develop a groundwater flow model for the basaltic aquifer system of the Pullman-Moscow area based on new spatial and temporal data

  6. HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING • Palouse loess • Saddle Mts. • Wanapum basalt • Grande Ronde basalt • Imnaha basalt • Pre-basalt CRBG

  7. HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING (cont’d) • Palouse loess: rural domestic use • Wanapum basalt: major aquifer for Moscow till 1960’s • Grande Ronde basalt: source for more than 90% of water supply, with a recent construction of WSU #8

  8. Occurred during late Miocene and early Pliocene (17–6 mya BP) • Engulfing ~ 1.6×105 km2 of the Pacific Northwest between Cascade Range and Rocky Mt., covering parts of ID, WA, and OR • Over 300 high-volume individual lava flows identified, along with countless smaller flows, with vents up to 150 km long • Eventually accumulating to more than 1,800 m thick • Tectonic origin (Hooper, 1997) • Yellowstone hot spot • Thinning of continental lithosphere due to spreading behind Cascade arc • Proximity of fissure vents to tectonic boundary between accreted terranes and lithospheres of old N. Am. Plate Source: USGS, http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/

  9. Source: ND Space Grant Consortium, http://volcano.und.edu/

  10. METHODOLOGY:I. GIS DATABASE DEVELOPMENT • Data Collection • Well log • Groundwater level • Pumpage • Precipitation • Geochemistry • Data Compilation • Digitizing into ArcGIS • Processing existing and new coverages: • Topography • Township and range to UTM conversion of well coordinates • Stream network • Land use • Soil • Watershed boundary

  11. Digitizing & Processing Well Data

  12. Digitizing & Processing Well Data cont’d A a Well 15/46-31J1 Well 39N/5W-7ad2

  13. Data Analysis Plot long-term hydrographs Separate vs composite Their relations with precipitation and pumpage Build structural contour maps To depict the shape of stratigraphic horizons Construct aquifer contour maps Wanapum Grande Ronde Develop hydrogeological cross-sections Across most of the basin In various directions METHODOLOGY:I. GIS DATABASE DEVELOPMENT

  14. RESULTS AND DISSCUSSION:I. GEOSPATIAL DATA ANALYSIS

  15. Composite Hydrograph of Wells in the Palouse Basin

  16. Long-term Groundwater Pumpage from Two Aquifers

  17. Long-term Hydrographs • Each aquifer has a distinct pattern of water-level fluctuations in relation to pumping, climate, recharge • Wanapum saw its groundwater level recovery since 1960’s when pumping shifted to the Grande Ronde • Relatively more consistent pattern of fluctuation in Grande Ronde wells in Pullman than in Moscow • 0.3–0.6 m/yr groundwater level decline observed at both pumping centers

  18. Contour Map of Top Altitude of Wanapum Formation

  19. Contour Map of Top Altitude of Grande Ronde Formation

  20. Structural Contour Maps Wanapum • Wanapum basalt is to the NW controlled by NW trending folds, and dips and thickens E and W away from Pullman Grande Ronde • The top of GR drops in elevation E towards Moscow and W and NW away from Pullman • Substantial lateral changes in the occurrence and nature of sediments exist between Pullman and Moscow

  21. Potentiometric surface contour map of the Wanapum aquifer (1960s)

  22. Potentiometric surface contour map of the G. Ronde aquifer (1990s)

  23. Potentiometric Surface Contour Maps Wanapum • Hydraulic connection between Pullman and Moscow is weak • General groundwater movement is to W and NW Grande Ronde • Piezometric surface shows two cones of depression as a result of heavy pumping • The open shape of cones of depression to the W and NW is possibly controlled by structural features

  24. METHODOLOGY:II. DEVELOPING A NEW MODEL

  25. Water Release from a Confined Aquifer: Water Expansion + Aquifer Compression Source: http://www.bae.uky.edu/sworkman/AEN438G/theiseq/theiseq.html

  26. Unsteady-State Flow in “Ideal” Aquifer: Theis (1935) Equation “The flow of ground water has many analogies to the flow of heat by conduction. We have exact analogies … for thermal gradient, thermal conductivity, and specific heat…solution of some of our problems is probably already worked out in the theory of heat conduction…” Source: http://www.olemiss.edu/sciencenet/saltnet/theisbio.html

  27. Unsteady-State Flow in “Ideal” Aquifer: The Solution “Actually derived by a mathematician friend of Theis, C.I. Lubin. Reportedly, Lubin declined co-authorship of the paper because he regarded his contribution as mathematically trivial.” [Fetter, 1994]

  28. Groundwater Flow Model Development • Industry standard MODFLOW • MODular 3-d finite-difference groundwater FLOW model • Free source codes from the USGS and GUI versions available • PEST (nonlinear parameter estimator) can be used with MODFLOW for optimal parameterization Source: http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/modflow2000/modflow2000.html

  29. Comparison of Model Domain and Structure

  30. Comparison of Western Boundary Condition

  31. Comparison of Hydraulic Parameterization Comparison of Hydraulic Parameterization

  32. Comparison of Recharge Distribution

  33. Management Alternatives Given: pumpage needs 2,400 MGY = 9.1×106 m3, basin area 660 km2

  34. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS • GIS database has in the first time brought together the various scattered data pertinent to PBA hydrogeology and placed it in uniform and easily accessible form • Such database facilitates efficient data retrieval and analysis and allows continuous updating and refinement, forming a solid foundation for future trans-boundary hydrogeolocial investigation • A great deal has been learned from this newly available digital temporal and spatial data • Development of an improve basin-scale groundwater flow model is underway

More Related