1 / 59

Learning about order from noise Quantum noise studies of ultracold atoms

Learning about order from noise Quantum noise studies of ultracold atoms. Eugene Demler Harvard University. Collaborators: Ehud Altman, Robert Cherng, Adilet Imambekov, Vladimir Gritsev, Mikhail Lukin, Anatoli Polkovnikov.

Télécharger la présentation

Learning about order from noise Quantum noise studies of ultracold atoms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning about order from noiseQuantum noise studies of ultracold atoms Eugene Demler Harvard University Collaborators: Ehud Altman, Robert Cherng, Adilet Imambekov, Vladimir Gritsev, Mikhail Lukin, Anatoli Polkovnikov Funded by NSF, Harvard-MIT CUA, AFOSR, DARPA, MURI

  2. Adiabaticity of creating many-body fermionic states in optical lattices Outline Introduction. Historical review Quantum noise analysis of time-of-flight experiments with atoms in optical lattices: HBT experiments and beyond Quantum noise in interference experiments with independent condensates

  3. Quantum noise Classical measurement: collapse of the wavefunction into eigenstates of x Histogram of measurements of x

  4. Probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics Bohr-Einstein debate on spooky action at a distance Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment Measuring spin of a particle in the left detector instantaneously determines its value in the right detector

  5. + + S 1 2 q1 q2 - - Aspect’s experiments:tests of Bell’s inequalities S Correlation function Classical theories with hidden variable require Quantum mechanics predicts B=2.7 for the appropriate choice of q‘s and the state Experimentally measured value B=2.697. Phys. Rev. Let. 49:92 (1982)

  6. Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiments Classical theory of the second order coherence Hanbury Brown and Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A, 242, pp. 300-324 Measurements of the angular diameter of Sirius Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A, 248, pp. 222-237

  7. Quantum theory of HBT experiments Glauber, Quantum Optics and Electronics (1965) HBT experiments with matter Experiments with neutrons Ianuzzi et al., Phys Rev Lett (2006) For bosons Experiments with electrons Kiesel et al., Nature (2002) Experiments with 4He, 3He Westbrook et al., Nature (2007) For fermions Experiments with ultracold atoms Bloch et al., Nature (2005,2006)

  8. e- e- Shot noise in electron transport Proposed by Schottky to measure the electron charge in 1918 Spectral density of the current noise Related to variance of transmitted charge When shot noise dominates over thermal noise Poisson process of independent transmission of electrons

  9. Shot noise in electron transport Current noise for tunneling across a Hall bar on the 1/3 plateau of FQE Etien et al. PRL 79:2526 (1997) see also Heiblum et al. Nature (1997)

  10. Quantum noise analysis of time-of-flight experiments with atoms in optical lattices: Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiments and beyond Theory: Altman, Demler, Lukin, PRA 70:13603 (2004) Experiment: Folling et al., Nature 434:481 (2005); Spielman et al., PRL 98:80404 (2007); Tom et al. Nature 444:733 (2006)

  11. Atoms in optical lattices Theory: Jaksch et al. PRL (1998) Experiment: Kasevich et al., Science (2001); Greiner et al., Nature (2001); Phillips et al., J. Physics B (2002) Esslinger et al., PRL (2004); Ketterle et al., PRL (2006)

  12. U t Bose Hubbard model tunneling of atoms between neighboring wells repulsion of atoms sitting in the same well

  13. Bose Hubbard model M.P.A. Fisher et al., PRB40:546 (1989) N=3 Mott 4 Superfluid N=2 Mott 0 2 N=1 Mott 0 Superfluid phase Weak interactions Mott insulator phase Strong interactions

  14. Mott insulator Superfluid t/U Superfluid to insulator transition in an optical lattice M. Greiner et al., Nature 415 (2002)

  15. Why study ultracold atoms in optical lattices

  16. U t t Fermionic atoms in optical lattices Experiments with fermions in optical lattice, Kohl et al., PRL 2005

  17. Antiferromagnetic and superconducting Tc of the order of 100 K Atoms in optical lattice Antiferromagnetism and pairing at sub-micro Kelvin temperatures Same microscopic model

  18. Positive U Hubbard model Possible phase diagram. Scalapino, Phys. Rep. 250:329 (1995) Antiferromagnetic insulator D-wave superconductor

  19. Atoms in optical lattice Same microscopic model Quantum simulations of strongly correlated electron systems using ultracold atoms Detection?

  20. Quantum noise analysis as a probe of many-body states of ultracold atoms

  21. Time of flight experiments Quantum noise interferometry of atoms in an optical lattice Second order coherence

  22. Second order coherence in the insulating state of bosons.Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiment Experiment: Folling et al., Nature 434:481 (2005)

  23. Hanburry-Brown-Twiss stellarinterferometer

  24. Bosons at quasimomentum expand as plane waves with wavevectors Second order coherence in the insulating state of bosons First order coherence: Oscillations in density disappear after summing over Second order coherence: Correlation function acquires oscillations at reciprocal lattice vectors

  25. Second order coherence in the insulating state of bosons.Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiment Experiment: Folling et al., Nature 434:481 (2005)

  26. Second order coherence in the insulating state of fermions.Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiment Experiment: Tom et al. Nature 444:733 (2006)

  27. How to detect antiferromagnetism

  28. Probing spin order in optical lattices Correlation Function Measurements Extra Bragg peaks appear in the second order correlation function in the AF phase

  29. How to detect fermion pairing Quantum noise analysis of TOF images is more than HBT interference

  30. n(r’) k F n(r) Second order interference from the BCS superfluid Theory: Altman et al., PRA 70:13603 (2004) n(k) k BCS BEC

  31. Momentum correlations in paired fermions Greiner et al., PRL 94:110401 (2005)

  32. Fermion pairing in an optical lattice Second Order Interference In the TOF images Normal State Superfluid State measures the Cooper pair wavefunction One can identify unconventional pairing

  33. Interference experimentswith cold atoms

  34. Interference of independent condensates Experiments: Andrews et al., Science 275:637 (1997) Theory: Javanainen, Yoo, PRL 76:161 (1996) Cirac, Zoller, et al. PRA 54:R3714 (1996) Castin, Dalibard, PRA 55:4330 (1997) and many more

  35. Nature 4877:255 (1963)

  36. Experiments with 2D Bose gas z Hadzibabic, Dalibard et al., Nature 441:1118 (2006) Time of x flight Experiments with 1D Bose gas S. Hofferberth et al. arXiv0710.1575

  37. Interference of two independent condensates r’ r 1 r+d d 2 Clouds 1 and 2 do not have a well defined phase difference. However each individual measurement shows an interference pattern

  38. Amplitude of interference fringes, For identical condensates Interference of fluctuating condensates Polkovnikov, Altman, Demler, PNAS 103:6125(2006) d x1 For independent condensates Afr is finite but Df is random x2 Instantaneous correlation function

  39. Fluctuations in 1d BEC Thermal fluctuations Thermally energy of the superflow velocity Quantum fluctuations

  40. For non-interacting bosons and For impenetrable bosons and Interference between Luttinger liquids Luttinger liquid at T=0 K – Luttinger parameter Finite temperature Experiments: Hofferberth, Schumm, Schmiedmayer

  41. is a quantum operator. The measured value of will fluctuate from shot to shot. L Distribution function of fringe amplitudes for interference of fluctuating condensates Gritsev, Altman, Demler, Polkovnikov, Nature Physics 2006 Imambekov, Gritsev, Demler, cond-mat/0612011 Higher moments reflect higher order correlation functions We need the full distribution function of

  42. Distribution function of interference fringe contrast Experiments: Hofferberth et al., arXiv0710.1575 Theory: Imambekov et al. , cond-mat/0612011 Quantum fluctuations dominate: asymetric Gumbel distribution (low temp. T or short length L) Thermal fluctuations dominate: broad Poissonian distribution (high temp. T or long length L) Intermediate regime: double peak structure Comparison of theory and experiments: no free parameters Higher order correlation functions can be obtained

  43. Ly Lx Lx Interference of two dimensional condensates Experiments: Hadzibabic et al. Nature (2006) Gati et al., PRL (2006) Probe beam parallel to the plane of the condensates

  44. Ly Lx Below KT transition Above KT transition Interference of two dimensional condensates.Quasi long range order and the KT transition

  45. Experiments with 2D Bose gas low temperature higher temperature Hadzibabic, Dalibard et al., Nature 441:1118 (2006) Time of flight z x Typical interference patterns

  46. Contrast after integration integration over x axis z 0.4 low T z middle T 0.2 integration over x axis high T z 0 0 Dx 10 20 30 integration distance Dx (pixels) Experiments with 2D Bose gas Hadzibabic et al., Nature 441:1118 (2006) x integration over x axis z

  47. 0.4 low T 0.2 Exponent a middle T 0 0 10 20 30 high T if g1(r) decays exponentially with : high T low T 0.5 0.4 if g1(r) decays algebraically or exponentially with a large : central contrast 0.3 “Sudden” jump!? 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Experiments with 2D Bose gas Hadzibabic et al., Nature 441:1118 (2006) fit by: Integrated contrast integration distance Dx

  48. 30% Fraction of images showing at least one dislocation 20% 10% low T high T 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 central contrast Experiments with 2D Bose gas. Proliferation of thermal vortices Hadzibabic et al., Nature 441:1118 (2006) The onset of proliferation coincides with ashifting to 0.5!

  49. Adiabaticity of creating many-body fermionic states in optical lattices

  50. Formation of molecules with increasing interaction strength Strohmaier et al., arXiv:0707.314 Saturation in the number of molecules created is related to the finite rate of changing interaction strength U(t)

More Related