grady-andrews
Uploaded by
48 SLIDES
543 VUES
480LIKES

Transit Corridor Feasibility Study for El Paso MPO Area

DESCRIPTION

Evaluate high-capacity transit options, develop multimodal recommendations, address mobility needs, network deficiencies, and environmental issues while considering costs and future trends in El Paso MPO Area.

1 / 48

Télécharger la présentation

Transit Corridor Feasibility Study for El Paso MPO Area

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: • Regional Goals and Objectives • Mobility Needs • Transportation Network Deficiencies • Environmental and Land Use Issues • Cost and Financing • Short -Term and Long-Term Improvements • Regional and International Trips

  2. Definition The Transit Corridor Feasibility Study Will: • Evaluate high capacity transit options for the El Paso MPO Area • Explore a variety of travel modes and congestion management measures • Develop a multimodal recommendation which meets short and long term travel needs

  3. Corridors

  4. Goals & Objectives • Meet Mobility Needs • Develop a Multimodal Transportation System • Improve and Optimize Current Transportation System • Improve International Access • Encourage Transit Supportive Land Use

  5. Needs • Transit • Roadway and General Mobility

  6. Needs • Transit • Access to healthcare, social services, and shopping activities • Access to educational institutions • Access to employment • Transit access to areas of the county with limited or no service • More express service – reduced transit travel time

  7. Needs • Roadway and General Mobility • Additional capacity along roadways • Additional capacity at I-10 interchanges

  8. Needs • Key Elements and Trends • Population and Employment by 2020: +38% each • Roadway Capacity: 90% arterials congested in 2020 • Transit Travel Time: increased due to congestion

  9. Needs • Key Characteristics • Transit Riders: young, older, lower income • Transit Trip Purpose: Work and Education • Spatial: Linear Corridors; Limited Capacity

  10. Needs • Peer Comparisons • Cities with High Capacity Transit • Cities Planning High Capacity Transit

  11. Evaluation • Preliminary Screening • Detailed Evaluation

  12. Evaluation • Qualitative Criteria • Transportation Needs and Mobility • Ridership Potential • Environmental Issues • Regional Goals/Objectives and Land Use • Neighborhood Compatibility

  13. Evaluation • Quantitative Criteria • Travel Time • Ridership • Capital and Operating Cost • Financing • Right-of-Way and Physical Constraints

  14. Technologies • Bus • Bus/HOV lanes • Busway/BRT • Light Rail Transit • Commuter Rail • Heavy Rail • Automated Guideway Transit • Monorail

  15. Bus

  16. Bus/HOV Lanes

  17. Busway/BRT

  18. Light Rail Transit

  19. Commuter Rail

  20. Heavy Rail

  21. Automated Guideway Transit

  22. Monorail

  23. Technologies Recommended- Bus- Bus/HOV- Busway/BRT- Light Rail- Commuter Rail Not Recommended- Heavy Rail- MonorailSpecial Case - Automated Guideway

  24. Mesa Corridor Applicable Technologies- Bus- Busway/BRT- Light Rail- Commuter Rail

  25. Mesa Bus Alignments

  26. Mesa Busway/BRTAlignment

  27. Mesa Light Rail Alignment

  28. Mesa Commuter RailAlignment

  29. Dyer/US 54 Corridor Applicable Technologies- Bus- Bus/HOV- Busway/BRT- Light Rail- Commuter Rail

  30. Dyer/US 54 BusAlignments

  31. Dyer/US 54 Bus/HOV Alignment

  32. Dyer/US 54 LRT Alignment

  33. Dyer/US 54 CommuterRail Alignment

  34. Montana Corridor ApplicableTechnologies- Bus- Busway/BRT- Light Rail

  35. Montana Bus Alignments

  36. Montana Busway/BRT Alignment

  37. Montana Light Rail Alignment

  38. AlamedaCorridor ApplicableTechnologies- Bus- Bus/HOV- Busway/BRT- Light Rail- Commuter Rail

  39. Alameda Bus Alignments

  40. Alameda Bus/HOV Alignments

  41. Alameda Busway/BRT Alignments

  42. Alameda Light Rail Alignment

  43. Alameda Commuter Rail Alignments

  44. Juarez - Downtown Connection Transit Improvements

  45. Juarez - Ysleta Connection Transit Improvements

  46. Next Steps • Refine Technologies and Alignments • Preliminary Evaluation and Recommendations for Advancement • Develop Preliminary Costs and Ridership • Identify Potential Impacts • Evalution and Recommendations

More Related