1 / 15

Missouri Reading Initiative

Missouri Reading Initiative. Spring 2002 Survey Results. K = 134 1 st = 172 2 nd = 142 3 rd = 131. Reading = 27 Special Ed. = 26 Title 1 = 21 Administrators = 28 Other = 53. Sample = 734 Respondents from 60 1 st and 2 nd Schools. Years Teaching: K 15.5 1 st 14.0

grady-norton
Télécharger la présentation

Missouri Reading Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Missouri Reading Initiative Spring 2002 Survey Results

  2. K = 134 1st = 172 2nd = 142 3rd = 131 Reading = 27 Special Ed. = 26 Title 1 = 21 Administrators = 28 Other = 53 Sample = 734 Respondents from 60 1st and 2nd Schools

  3. Years Teaching: K 15.5 1st 14.0 2nd 11.7 3rd 10.4 Reading 18.5 Sp. Ed. 8.1 Title 1 20.5 Admin. 18.3 Years at School: K 10.3 1st 10.0 2nd 8.4 3rd 7.8 Reading 11.3 Sp. Ed. 4.2 Title 1 14.3 Admin. 8.5 Sample Profile:Length of Service

  4. Overall ratings (N=60)

  5. 1st (n= 36) and 2nd (n=24) Year School RatingsAverages: Ist =3.78 2nd=4.03

  6. 1st and 2nd Year SchoolsRatings Category 1st Year 2nd Year Sample • 2.0-2.49 1 0 1 • 2.5-2.99 4 3 7 • 3.0-3.49 5 0 5 • 3.5-3.99 8 5 13 • 4.0-4.49 12 7 19 • 4.5-5.0 6 9 15 • Totals: 36 24 60

  7. How has MRI changed or reinforced your teaching? • Grade Level • K 4.08 • 1st 3.75 • 2nd 4.01 • 3rd 3.75 • Reading 4.29 • Sp. Ed. 3.65 • Title 1 4.40 • Admin. 4.44 • Total 4.01 1st=3.79 2nd=4.15

  8. Professional Development Model • Grade Level • K 4.26 • 1 4.07 • 2 4.06 • 3 4.08 • Reading 4.13 • Sp. Ed. 4.52 • Title 1 4.73 • Admin. 3.72 • Total 4.15 1st=4.16 2nd=4.15

  9. Did you feel you had a part in setting up MRI? • Grade Level • K 2.88 • 1st 2.69 • 2nd 2.87 • 3rd 2.64 • Reading 3.64 • Sp. Ed. 2.76 • Title 1 3.45 • Admin. 4.40 • Total 2.85 1st=2.76 2nd=3.09

  10. Do you feel you have a voice in how MRI develops? • Grade Level • K 3.00 • 1st 2.96 • 2nd 3.04 • 3rd 2.86 • Reading 3.62 • Sp. Ed. 2.60 • Title 1 3.86 • Admin. 4.32 • Total 2.93 1st=2.86 2nd=3.07

  11. Parental Involvement/Quantity • Grade Level • K 1.77 • 1st 1.66 • 2nd 1.62 • 3rd 1.64 • Reading 2.24 • Sp. Ed. 1.57 • Title 1 2.42 • Admin. 2.88 • Total 1.73 1st=1.64 2nd=1.91

  12. Parental Involvement/Quality • Grade Level • K 1.96 • 1st 1.95 • 2nd 1.92 • 3rd 1.86 • Reading 2.35 • Sp. Ed. 1.67 • Title 1 2.79 • Admin. 3.04 • Total 1.96 1st=1.86 2nd=2.15

  13. Are students reading and writing better? • Grade Level • K 3.95 • 1st 3.67 • 2nd 3.66 • 3rd 3.50 • Reading 4.04 • Sp. Ed. 3.30 • Title 1 4.24 • Admin. 4.10 • Total 3.80 1st=3.61 2nd=3.88

  14. Reflecting on the effectiveness of the MRI program as a whole, how would you rate it? • Grade Level • K 4.10 • 1st 3.81 • 2nd 3.80 • 3rd 3.68 • Reading 4.54 • Sp. Ed. 4.00 • Title 1 4.43 • Admin. 4.44 • Total 3.98 1st=3.80 2nd=4.13

  15. Issues: • “Overwhelmed” • Orientation • Communication • Materials • Preparation: Committing to Early Literacy • Time • Planning • Extra time for teachers • Study groups • Budgets

More Related