1 / 16

NO X Control Costs and Allowance Prices: Expectations and Outcomes

NO X Control Costs and Allowance Prices: Expectations and Outcomes. Alex Farrell Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Support: National Science Foundation afarrell@andrew.cmu.edu http://hdgc.epp.cmu.edu/. Expectations. Achieve public policy objectives

grady
Télécharger la présentation

NO X Control Costs and Allowance Prices: Expectations and Outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NOX Control Costs and Allowance Prices: Expectations and Outcomes Alex Farrell Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Support: National Science Foundation afarrell@andrew.cmu.edu http://hdgc.epp.cmu.edu/

  2. Expectations • Achieve public policy objectives • Control costs • Engineering economic studies • Allowance prices • Deterministic simulation models • Marginal costs at equilibrium conditions with perfect information

  3. NOx Control Cost Forecasts* • STAPPA/ALAPCO (1995) $1,300 to $2,300 (0.15 lb/mmBTU, seasonal control) • OTAG (1997) $600 to $4,000 (~0.30 to 0.20 lb/mmBTU, seasonal control) • NESCAUM (1998) $800 to $3,500 (0.15 lb/mmBTU, seasonal control) *All estimates given in $/ton NOX

  4. OTC NOx Allowance Price Forecasts • ICF • Phase 2: $1,700 • Farrell, Carter and Raufer (1999) • Phase 1: $1,350 • Phase 2: $2,100-$2,500 • EPA (OTAG estimate) • $800 - $1,150

  5. OTC NOx Market Data • What’s available ? • EPA data - NOX Allowance Tracking System (NATS) • Broker/Trader data - some price information and some analysis • What’s missing ? • EPA data • Forward transactions and derivative products • Inter-company trading • State programs (e.g. ERCs) • Broker data • Verification and completeness • So what ? • Increased uncertainty • Only experts are the brokers/traders

  6. Features of the Early OTC NOx Market* • Total Allocation 397,869 tons (all vintages) • Allowances Traded 33,279 (8%) • Sold • By Sources 26,427 (7%) • By Others 6,852 • Bought • By Sources 16,176 (4%) • By Others 16,103 • Geographic Distribution • DE 690 Buying only • MA - 215 Selling only • NH - 9,669 Selling only • NJ 3,965 Buying and selling • NY - 4,199 Buying and selling • PA - 823 Buying and selling *6/11/99 on EPA NATS website, all vintages

  7. Uncertainty and Compliance • Restructuring + Emissions Trading = • Shifts risk to shareholders • Every compliance choice is an implicit position in the allowance market • With no banked allowances, ‘99 allocations are like your last tank of gas • Deterministic analysis and planning fail • Mathematical programming, Computable General Equilibrium models • Probabilistic analysis emerging • Stochastic programming, Monte Carlo simulation analysis • Risk management tools emerging • Financial derivatives • Objective in a risky world • Robustness, not optimization

  8. Public Policy Issues • NOx emissions and ozone formation have important spatial and temporal patterns • Ozone episodes in non-attainment areas vs. seasonal compliance in a region • Will compliance lead to attainment ? • Need for policy analysis ? • Brokers/Traders can’t do this (too narrow, limited credibility) • More price information

  9. Tentative Conclusions • Directionality • Control cost estimates are not good predictors of allowance prices in young emissions markets • Short-term costs are a lower bound • Even in mature markets, contextual factors may be more important than engineering economics • Implications of uncertainty • Information scarce • Managing startup • Better analytical tools needed (and emerging) • Increasing market sophistication

  10. http://hdgc.epp.cmu.edu Center for the Integrated Study of the Human Dimensions of Global Change Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University

  11. OTC NOx MOU • 12 northeastern States and the District of Columbia • Stationary sources >25MWe • Seasonal (May - September) Cap & Trade • Phase 1: 1999-2002, ~0.25 lb NOX/mmBTU • Phase 2: 2003 + , ~0.15 lb NOX/mmBTU • Individual State programs meant to work together

More Related