1 / 19

Masanori Konda (Kyoto University/JAMSTEC IORGC) Akira Shibata (JAXA/EORC)

Correction of the Relative Wind Direction Effect on the AMSR Wind Speed and Its Impact on Estimating the Turbulent Heat Flux. Masanori Konda (Kyoto University/JAMSTEC IORGC) Akira Shibata (JAXA/EORC). Outline. Wind speed retrieval under the relative wind direction dependence (AMSR, AMSE)

graham
Télécharger la présentation

Masanori Konda (Kyoto University/JAMSTEC IORGC) Akira Shibata (JAXA/EORC)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Correction of the Relative Wind Direction Effect on the AMSR Wind Speed and Its Impact on Estimating the Turbulent Heat Flux Masanori Konda (Kyoto University/JAMSTEC IORGC) Akira Shibata (JAXA/EORC)

  2. Outline • Wind speed retrieval under the relative wind direction dependence (AMSR, AMSE) • Application to AMSR wind • Application to AMSR-E wind • Estimation of the instantaneous latent heat flux by using AMSR products • Comparison with the in situ measurements (TAO, KEO, JKEO) • JKEO and KEO surface measurements across the Kuroshio Extension.

  3. The relative wind direction effect on the brightness temperature • The incident angle is determined according to the pilot study of Stogryn (1967). • The angle between the sensor azimuth and the in-situ wind • Inhomogeneous change of the sea surface caused by the ocean wind affects the brightness temperature (Wentz 1992, Yueh et al.1999, Meissner and Wentz 2002 etc., Konda and Shibata, 2004) • the AMSR observation collocated with SeaWinds wvc • Correction of the relative wind effect without collocation of the SeaWinds (for the AMSR-E) f = 0, when AMSR is looking downwind

  4. PS36 (Partial shift of of the h-pol caused by wind) (Konda and Shibata 2004, GRL) PS36T(SST, IWV, CLW, SSWS, RWD)

  5. Application to AMSR-E data • Look-up table established by AMSR-SeaWinds collocations. • PS36= PS36T( SST , IWV , CLW , U6 , RWD ) These should be known from AMSR-E • Another proxy for the wind speed • Correlation with the SSWS (worse than AMSR SSWS) • Less sensitive to the RWD Obtainable from the level 2 data U6 and SeaWinds

  6. look-up table for AMSR-E • PS36 = PS36T(SST,IWV,CLW, U6, RWD) • PS36TR=PS36T(RWD)|SST,IWV,CLW,U6 Obtain from AMSR-E U6= 2-3m/s U6= 6-7m/s U6= 9-10m/s (SST, IWV, CLW) = ( 5-7C, 4-5mm, 0-0.02 Kg/m2) typical in the cold climate condition

  7. Correction of the RWD dependence (AMSR wind) Wind speed Red: uncorrected Black: corrected Cold condition Tropical condition

  8. Application to the AMSR-E wind • Collocation with SeaWinds on QuikSCAT • (SST, IWV, CLW) = ( 5-7 oC, 3-6 mm, 0-0.02 Kg/m2)

  9. Correction summary

  10. Impact of the RWD correction on the estimation of the latent heat flux difference between the latent heat flux with and without the RWD correction winds RMS=11.1 W/m2 RMS=28.0 W/m2 Accurate retrieval is needed.

  11. Obtaining the snapshot turbulent (latent) heat flux by AMSR (AMSR-E)

  12. Simulated impact of the time-lagged observation on the latent heat flux, using TAO (in situ) measurement The difference should be ambiguity rather than error Time-lagged latent heat flux 1.3 (44.9) W/m2 6-10 (AM/PM) average

  13. If we obtain individual parameters from the other satellite sensors (time-lagged measurement of latent heat flux) 48.8 (86.4) W/m2 AVHRR-SST QuikSCAT wind 10:00(AM/PM) 6:30 (AM/PM) 6-10 (AM/PM) average 10:30 (AM/PM) AMSR IWV => Liu and Niiler (1986)

  14. Instantaneous observation of the latent heat flux - summary - Ambiguity brought by the time-lag observation.

  15. Comparison with in situ observationKEO (Kuroshio Extension Observatory) and JKEO • Under the mid-latitude climate system • Twin measurement across the Kuroshio Extension SST front. • Under the active synoptic scale phenomena (seasonal wind, storm track, Typhoon etc.) Color: SST, Contour: NNR latent heat flux • JKEO (2007,2- 2008,2) => K-triton (2008, 2 -) • Northern side across the Kuroshio extension • Real time data will be accessed via JAMSTEC home page • KEO site: http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/keo/index.html • JKEO site : http://www.jamstec.go.jp/iorgc/ocorp/ktsfg/data/jkeo/

  16. More validation is needed in the mid-latitude RMSE=2.3 m/s RMSE=1.1 m/s Pixels are within 25km, 60 minutes. KEO wind : every 10 minutes JKEO wind: daily average

  17. summary • The method to correct the RWD dependence of the AMSR-derived SSWS (Konda and Shibata, 2004, Konda et al. 2006) is applied to AMSR-E wind. • AMSR-E SSWS in the mid latitude (KEO and JKEO sites) needs more validation or improvement of the algorithm. • Multi-parameters measurement by AMSR and AMSR-E has a merit of obtaining the snapshot latent heat flux (~50 W/m2). • KEO and JKEO buoys provides in situ boundary layer parameters in the Kuroshio Extension region. • KEO : http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/keo/index.htmlJKEO: http://www.jamstec.go.jp/iorgc/ocorp/ktsfg/data/jkeo/

  18. The AMSR-E wind (standard product level 2) and the KEO wind 2004,Jun. –Dec. AMSR-E level 2 wind 6m/s RMS=2.14 m/s AMSR-E L2B wind -6m/s Relative wind direction The RWD effect should be hidden because of the large error. (more effort is needed). KEO wind Pixels are within 10km, 10 minutes. KEO wind : every 10 minutes

  19. The AMSR-E wind (standard product level 2) and the KEO wind 2004,Jun. – Dec. Wind after the correction 6m/s RMS=2.14 m/s AMSR-E L2B wind -6m/s Relative wind direction The RWD effect should be hidden because of the large error. (more effort is needed). KEO wind Pixels are within 10km, 10 minutes. KEO wind : every 10 minutes

More Related