1 / 14

1. Vietnam research team

FBLI: Advancing Ecohealth in South East Asia Using Ecohealth Approach for a Better Management of Livestock Waste in Hanam Province, Vietnam FBLI Research Workshop, Kunming, 19-21 Oct 2012. 1. Vietnam research team. Le Vu Anh- Public Health – Project Director

greta
Télécharger la présentation

1. Vietnam research team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FBLI: Advancing Ecohealth in South East AsiaUsing Ecohealth Approach for a Better Management of LivestockWaste in Hanam Province, VietnamFBLI Research Workshop, Kunming, 19-21 Oct 2012

  2. 1. Vietnam research team • Le Vu Anh- Public Health – Project Director • Nguyen Viet Hung – Public Health, biology, risk analysis- HSPH • Pham Duc Phuc – Epidemiology, risk analysis, water &sanitation- HSPH • Tran Thi Tuyet Hanh – Environmental Health, risk assessment - HSPH • Dinh Xuan Tung – Livestock economic – NIAS • Tran Minh Hang – Biology, social anthropology - IOA • Bui Huy Tung (PhD student) – Microbiology, Public Health- HSPH • Pham Thi Huong Giang- Project assistant • Nguyen Mai Huong– research assistant

  3. 2. Research site • Hoang Tay commune, Kim Bang, Ha Nam. • 5,713 people (1,470 HHs). Income source: mainly agricultural production. 20% HHs have hygienic latrines. 86% HHs have livestock, situated closed to the houses and water sources, use raw excreta for crops • Total number of pig meat: 5,000; duck: 21,000; chicken: 17,000; buffaloes: 10; and cows: 100. two slaughter houses

  4. 3. General objective • Study the impacts of livestock waste on health, environment and socio-economics; identify and implement interventions to better manage livestock waste, improving the healh and well-being of people and environment using an ecohealth approach. Scientific research objectives: • Explore KAP of farmers and other stakeholders, as well as related factors of livestock waste management. • Assess the health impacts of livestock waste management. • Assess the environmental impacts of livestock waste management. • Assess the impact of livestock waste management on socio-economic environment.

  5. 4. Objectives (cont.) Intervention objectives: • To develop and implement practical and innovative solutions for better livestock waste management to improve healh and well-being of people and environment. Dissemination and Policy advocacy objective: • Disseminate research outputs to related ministries, institutions, NGOs, local departments, communities, and wider audiences through publications and presentations. • To engage policy makers at different levels, and use the study’s results to inform policy changes in livestock waste management.

  6. What are the KAP of farmers and related stakeholders on livestock waste mamagenent? What are the factors affecting farmers’ KAP on livestockwaste management in Hanam? What are the impacts of current livestock waste mamagenent in Hanam on environment and health? What are the environmental impact (nutrient fluxes) of livestock waste management and the critical control points of nutrient loads for pollution control in the area? What is the institutional setup (regulation) of waste management and how to address this to improve waste management? What are the innovative solutions to solve the problems? 5. Research questions

  7. 6. Project Framework and methods (1) ASSESSMENT • Human health • Health Risk : • QMRA • AMR • EPI? • (Vegetable? cropping?) • Environment • MFA (N,P) • Scenariosintervention • in: Soil, water, air • Socio-Economic • KAP • Costing • - Stake holder analysis Pigs+Poultry waste Solid manure (2) INTERVENTION (Health, environment, socio-economic) - Soft intervention “seed” - Case control intervention - Re-structure of livestock (household) Kitchen waste Compost biogas Market Crop Fish ponds SUCCESS Sewerage (3) ASSESSMENT Acceptance/ satisfication FAILURE

  8. 7. Stakeholders (strategic partners and beneficiaries) • Local authorities at provincial, district and commune levels • Villagers including pig and poultry farmers • Agricultural extension center, station • Veterinary experts at provincial, district and commune • Environmental experts at provincial, district and commune • Public health experts at provincial, district and commune • Local environmental company persons (state and private)

  9. 8. Boundary partners • MOH, MARD • Pig and poultry farmers • Manure collector/traders • Commune animal health workers • Communal health workers • Village health workers • Head of villagers • Commune Farmer association • Commune women Unions • Commune Agricultural cooperative • Key villagers • Consumers

  10. 9. Time table

  11. Indonesian research project: sanitation and hygiene China research project: waste reuse Thailand: ? 10. Possible Comparison with other countries

  12. Good link to Knowledge Translation and Capacity building, bringing students, policy makers and farmers together on the same study site Etc… 11. Links with other components of FBLI

  13. David WT: System thinking Jakob Zinsstag: design and integration Leuchai: Qualitative research Hein, Fang Jing: Policy and impacts 12. Questions and issues need inputs/ advices from resource persons

More Related