1 / 6

Analytical Hierarchy Process

Analytical Hierarchy Process. Hyman Chapter 9.3. Relative Preferences (Pairwise Comparison). Can be used in the pairwise comparison for a specific criterion but with a finer relative scale as shown in the following table. Relative Scale for Preference in Pairwise Comparison.

guadalupev
Télécharger la présentation

Analytical Hierarchy Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analytical Hierarchy Process Hyman Chapter 9.3

  2. Relative Preferences (Pairwise Comparison) • Can be used in the pairwise comparison for a specific criterion but with a finer relative scale as shown in the following table Relative Scale for Preference in Pairwise Comparison

  3. Pairwise Comparison (Torque criterion) • Three options A, B, and C • A is strongly preferred over B (scale of 5) • A is very strongly preferred over C (scale of 7) • B is strongly/moderately preferred over C (4) 1/3(0.106+0.04+0.084)=0.077

  4. Relative Importance (Pairwise Comparison) • Similar scale can also be used in the relative comparison between criteria (ex. how important in considering torque vs. bearing loads in design; it is the “k” factor in Hyman chapter 9, figure 9.2) Relative Scale for importance in Comparison of Criteria

  5. Pairwise Comparison Between Criteria • Three criteria slippage (S), bearing loads (BL), and torque (T) • BL is moderately more important than S (scale of 3) • BL is moderately/equally important than T (scale of 2) • S is equally important then T (1) 1/3(0.2+0.273+0.25)=0.241

  6. Overall Weighed Scale Different design weighed scale Criteria weighed scale importance to overall design Inferior design A = (0.211)(0.379) + (0.549)(0.319) + (0.241)(0.709) = 0.426 B = (0.211)(0.425) + (0.549)(0.074) + (0.241)(0.214) = 0.182 C = (0.211)(0.196) + (0.549)(0.607) + (0.241)(0.077) = 0.393

More Related