1 / 27

Network Traffic Modeling

Network Traffic Modeling. Arthur L. Blais University of Colorado, Colorado Springs. Introduction. Nature of Internet Traffic Trace-based vs. Analytic Models Network Traffic Characteristics Model Data and Distributions. Nature of Internet Traffic. Highly variable demands.

gyan
Télécharger la présentation

Network Traffic Modeling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Network Traffic Modeling Arthur L. Blais University of Colorado, Colorado Springs

  2. Introduction • Nature of Internet Traffic • Trace-based vs. Analytic Models • Network Traffic Characteristics • Model Data and Distributions Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  3. Nature of Internet Traffic • Highly variable demands. • Request inter-arrival rates. • File sizes and references. • Self-similarity. Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  4. Trace-based Model • Uses actual data traces to generate workloads • Advantages • Easy to implement • Disadvantages • Difficult to change or vary • Difficult to find causes of system behavior Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  5. Analytic Model • Mathematical models are used to generate workloads • Advantages • Capable of generating different workloads by varying workload characteristics. • Disadvantages • Difficult to construct • Need to identify important workload characteristics to model • Characteristics must be empirically measured Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  6. Network Traffic Characteristics • Client Characteristics • Server Characteristics • Network Characteristics Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  7. Client Characteristics • Request Rates • Sleep Time • Active Time • Inactive OFF Time (think time) • Active OFF Time (embedded references) • Request Sizes Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  8. Server Characteristics • File Sizes • Cache Size • Temporal Locality • Number of Connections • CPU speed Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  9. Network Characteristics • Bandwidth • Routing Path • Hop Count • Buffer Sizes • Packet Loss Rates Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  10. Workload Models • Client Models • Server Models Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  11. Client Workload Model • Sleep Time • Each Client has a time of day that it is awake • Fixed time assigned to each client so that the request rates from all the clients approximates the total request rate distribution for each hour of the day. • Inactive Off Time • Client think time, the amount of time after a request is received and the time the next request is made. • Pareto Distribution Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  12. Client Workload Model • Active Off Time • Inter-arrival time for each embedded request • Weibull Distribution • Embedded References • The number of references included with the requested document • Pareto Distribution Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  13. Server Workload Model • CPU speed • Number of Connections • File Size Distribution • Distribution Body ( <= 9020 bytes ) • Lognormal Distribution • Distribution Tail ( > 9020 bytes ) • Pareto Distribution Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  14. Client Sleep Time • Approximates the percentage of the Total Request Rates for each hour of the day. • Each client has a wakeup time and a sleep time attribute. Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  15. Client Hourly Request Rate Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  16. Inactive Off Time • Time between requests • Uses a Pareto Distribution • alpha: a = 1.5 • Lower bound: (k) = 1.0 • To create a random variant x: • u ~ U(0,1) • x = k / (1.0-u)^1.0/a Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  17. Inactive Off Time Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  18. Active Off Time • Time between embedded references • Uses a Weibull Distribution • alpha: a = 1.46 (scale parameter) • beta: b = 0.382 (shape parameter) • To create a random variant x: • u ~ U(0,1) • x = a ( -ln( 1.0 – u ) ^ 1.0/b Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  19. Active Off Time Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  20. Embedded References • Number of references in the requested document • Uses a Pareto Distribution • alpha: a = 1.5 • Lower bound: (k) = 1.0 • To create a random variant x: • u ~ U(0,1) • x = k / (1.0-u)^1.0/a Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  21. Embedded References Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  22. File Size Distribution • Two Distributions • Body • Lognormal Distribution • Create a lookup table • Tail • Pareto Distribution • alpha: a = 1.5 • Lower bound: (k) = 1.0 • To create a random variant x: • u ~ U(0,1) • x = k / (1.0-u)^1.0/a Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  23. File Size Distribution - Body Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  24. File Size Distribution - Tail Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  25. Self-similar Traffic • High Variability • Request Rate Inter-arrival Time • File Sizes • Negative impact on network performance • Modeling Characteristics • Heavy Tailed Distributions • Significant variability over a wide range of scales Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  26. Self-similar Traffic Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

  27. References • Paul Barford and Mark Crovella, Generating Representative Web Workloads for Network and Server Performance Evaluation, Boston University, Technical Paper BU-CS-97-006, December 31, 1997 • Mark E. Crovella and Azar Bestavros, Self-Similarity in World Wide Web Traffic: Evidence and Possible Causes, Boston University, Technical Paper BU-TR-95-015, 1995,1996, 1997 • Martin F. Arlitt and Carey L. Williamson, Internet Web Servers: Workload Characterization and Performance Implications, IEEE Transactions on Networking, Vol. 5, No. 5, October 1997 • Vern Paxon and Sally Floyd, Wide-Area Traffic: The Failure of Poisson Modeling, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and EECS Division, University of California, Berkeley, July 18,1995 Arthur L. Blais - UCCS

More Related