1 / 23

UK ATLAS SCT Module Quality Assurance

UK ATLAS SCT Module Quality Assurance. Joe Foster, Manchester University 04 Jan 2005 All results compiled in time for Christmas…. Last year I …. Was responsible for quality assurance on all UK SCT endcap modules. Helped refine module acceptance criteria.

halden
Télécharger la présentation

UK ATLAS SCT Module Quality Assurance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UK ATLAS SCT Module Quality Assurance Joe Foster, Manchester University 04 Jan 2005 All results compiled in time for Christmas…

  2. Last year I … • Was responsible for quality assurance on all UK SCT endcap modules. • Helped refine module acceptance criteria. • Ran web pages of current UK module statistics. • Examined and evaluated detailed test histories of 364 modules. • Chased missing test result, hidden problems, database funnies, unexplained failures, etc. • Was an officially sanctioned grumpy old man.

  3. Next Year I’ll… • Carry on with UK endcap module QA. • Examine another 250 or so module test histories in detail. • Further refine acceptance criteria to ensure we have enough modules of the right sort. • Maybe move to integration of SCT in ATLAS. • Do some e-Science. • Increase my rating to ‘grouch’?

  4. Aims of Module QA • Monitor each step of module production. • Continuous health check on each module. • Monitor overall production rates, yields, etc. • Provide complete history of each module. • Select the best modules for assembly in SCT. • Pass module parameters on to reconstruction and simulation.

  5. Module QA Tools • Production Database: • Current location and status of every SCT component. • Complete test history of of each component. • Shipping history of each component. • Complete assembly ‘family tree’. • Accessible world wide. • Module ‘traveler’ and visual inspection sheets. • Locally archived test results. • Scanned images of assembled modules. • Personal notes from meetings, emails, etc.

  6. UK Module Production Rates

  7. UK Modules Started

  8. Yield of Good + Pass UK Modules

  9. Leakage Current, All UK Modules

  10. RC Defects, All UK Modules

  11. Noise Occupancy, All UK Modules

  12. Midyf, All UK Modules

  13. Midyf vs Midxf, All UK Modules

  14. Msy vs. Mhy

  15. Zmax, Zmin Front, All UK Modules

  16. Zmax, Zmin Back, All UK Modules

  17. Zminf vs. Zminb, All UK Modules

  18. Time to Complete UK Module Testing

  19. Failure Modes

  20. UK XY/Z Survey Parameters out of Spec.

  21. Recoverable Modules Could recover ~5 modules by extending Pass spec. Up to 7 could be recovered by chip replacement.

  22. Module Summary Four inners fail ‘pass’ cuts due to jig teething problems.

  23. Conclusions • Good module QA information. • Good QA information on production processes. • UK should meet commitments on number and quality of modules.

More Related