1 / 14

INDONESIA

INDONESIA. Incentivizing Local Government Delivery. by Rewarding Results in Indonesia. Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS. Local Government (LG) Engagement Approach. thE challenGes. Lack of transparency and accountability Inadequate and cumbersome reporting

hamlin
Télécharger la présentation

INDONESIA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INDONESIA Incentivizing Local Government Delivery by Rewarding Results in Indonesia Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

  2. Local Government (LG) Engagement Approach thEchallenGes • Lack of transparency and accountability • Inadequate and cumbersome reporting • Weak monitoring and evaluation • Very little verification • Strengthen Country Institutions • Target large set of LGs • Improve LG internal controls • Work through existing transfer system thEApproach BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

  3. Dana AlokasiKhusus(Specific Purpose Grants) • Dana AlokasiKhusus(Specific Purpose Grants) allocated from national budget to local governments (LGs) to finance specific activities which are determined by the central government but under the jurisdiction of LG. • DAK allocation amount is determined on annual basis within the national budget, with LGs satisfying specific criteria to qualify • Total DAK allocation for 2010 is about US$2.32 billion. BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

  4. Overview of DAK Reimbursement Program • The Project will be a pilot with a proposed size of US$ 220 million over four years. • Focused in five provinces: Jambi, East Java, Central Kalimantan, West Sulawesi, and North Maluku. • Will be designed as Specific Investment Lendingand the mechanism will be Output-Based Disbursement (OBD) triggered by achievement of results. • The project will focus on the infrastructure sector (road, irrigation, water and sanitation), which makes up about 21% of DAK allocations BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

  5. Five Pilot Provinces

  6. Institutional Arrangements

  7. Project Development Objectives (DO) and Results Framework (RF) PDO: Improve the accountability and reporting of the central government’s Specific Purpose Grants (DAK) for the infrastructure sectors. RF: Improve financial and technical reporting RF: Conduct output verification of projects financed by DAK funds BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

  8. Key Features of DAK Program • Results focused • Reward Performance with grants • Reimburse eligible outputs • Strengthen Government Systems • Central government ownership and control • Strengthen LG Internal Controls • Web-based Monitoring and Reporting Systems • Independent Verification of Outputs and Compliance • Government internal auditor, BPKP BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

  9. Output Eligibility Criteria for Reimbursement BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

  10. Fiduciary and Safeguards Aspects BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

  11. Verification of Outputs (VO) • BPKP will finance the VO function. • BPKP will report its finding and recommendations in an Output Verification Report (OVR). • OVR will be the only basis to request Bank disbursements. The State Finance and Development Supervisory Board (BPKP) will carry out the output verification process on a representative sample basis for projects in LGs. BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

  12. Challenges in Project Implementation • Delivering Institutional Strengthening (TA) to LGs. Delays in the delivery of TA due to restructuring in MoF. • Compliance with Technical Guidelines. LGs lack capacity to deliver DAK outputs and to submit reports. • Coordination within Central Government. Multiple GoI stakeholders have overlapping roles. • Monitoring & Evaluation Unclear on who should conduct M&E.

  13. What Has Improved So Far Advance Payment. Made on July 5, 2011 and covers 64 percent of eligible districts. Verification Arrangement. BPKP has finalized verification guidelines and started verification test-run with LGs. Development of WBRS. Developing a new web-based system for financial and technical reporting. Improved Coordination.GoI has held several coordination meetings to define the role of each stakeholder in the project implementation.

  14. What’s Next? • Scale up existing project to more Provinces or sectors • Deepen reforms within LGs • Promote improved accountability downwards • Greater transparency in budgeting • Strengthen LG annual planning and execution • Improve efficiency and effectiveness of expenditures

More Related