1 / 14

Uranium Garlea /Agnew

Uranium Garlea /Agnew. Maud analysis, 3 orientations, 5 minutes per orientations, 42 histograms per orientation, 10 th order E-WIMV. dU_Tens_2_BC990, 0.3ppm, TD.

hanae-william
Télécharger la présentation

Uranium Garlea /Agnew

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Uranium Garlea/Agnew Maud analysis, 3 orientations, 5 minutes per orientations, 42 histograms per orientation, 10th order E-WIMV

  2. dU_Tens_2_BC990, 0.3ppm, TD Plate normal is obvious for both of these samples therefore, rotation is same and the difference we see in the texture is the difference between what we call RD and TD dU_Tens_5_BC993, 0.3ppm, RD

  3. dU_Comp_1_BC323, 0ppm, TD, pre-deformation initial textures we measured on 9/7 and initial orientation is unknown from post deformation. • dU, BC 323, 0ppm, TD, • post deformation I believe rotation of post deformation textures because orientation was found on 9/17 using SMARTS. Post deformation was measured on 10/13

  4. dU_Comp_3_BC996, 1.8ppm, TD Pre-deformation, measured 9/7 Pre-deformation, re-measured 9/16. Not sure why we re-measured these, but results are identical.  Post-deformation, measured 10/13. Visual inspection of the samples indicates that there may be a +or-5 degree rotation between pre and post measurements, again post deformation rotation is correct.

  5. dU_Tens_6_BC994, 1.8ppm, RD Pre-deformation, measured 9/6 Pre-deformation, re-measured 9/16. Not sure why we re-measured these, but results are identical.  Post-deformation, measured 10/13. Visual inspection of the samples indicates that plate normal is obvious pre-deformation and post deformation texture rotation same +or- 1 degree

  6. dU_Comp_6_BC999, 1.8ppm, RD Pre-deformation, measured 9/7 Pre-deformation, re-measured 9/16. Not sure why we re-measured these, but results are identical.  Post-deformation, measured 10/13. Visual inspection of the samples indicates that there is a 90 degree rotation between pre and post measurements, again post deformation rotation is correct.

  7. dU_Tens_3_BC991, 1.8ppm, TD Pre-deformation, measured 9/7 Pre-deformation, re-measured 9/16. Not sure why we re-measured these, but results are identical. 

  8. dU_Comp_4_BC997, 0ppm, RD pre-deformation Information I have indicates that initial textures we measured on 9/7 and initial orientation is approx. 90 degrees from post deformation. I believe rotation of post deformation textures because orientation was found on 9/17 using SMARTS. Post deformation was measured on 10/13 dU_Comp_4_BC997, 0ppm, RD post deformation

  9. dU_Tens_4_BC992, 0ppm, RD Pre-deformation, measured 9/6 Post-deformation, measured 10/13. Visual inspection of the samples indicates pre-deformation and post deformation texture rotation same +or- 5 degrees

  10. dU_Tens_2_BC990 0.3ppm plate normal obvious, measured 9/6, Tension

  11. dU_Tens_5_BC993

  12. dU_Tens_1_BC324 0 ppm Measure 9/6, pre-deformation

  13. dU_Comp_5_BC998, 0.3ppm, RD Pre-deformation measured 9/7, Re-measured using SMARTS and rotation is + or -15 degrees

  14. dU_Comp_2_BC995

More Related