1 / 12

Duluth: Men’s Violence Education Class

Duluth: Men’s Violence Education Class. Raco Cheng Project Supervisor Harmony House 12-03-2004. Presentation Outline.  “ Conventional” Perspectives and Models  The Duluth Model  Observation & Criticism.

hao
Télécharger la présentation

Duluth: Men’s Violence Education Class

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Duluth:Men’s Violence Education Class Raco Cheng Project Supervisor Harmony House 12-03-2004

  2. Presentation Outline  “Conventional” Perspectives and Models  TheDuluth Model  Observation &Criticism

  3. “Conventional” Perspectives Individual Perspective  Family System Perspective  Feminist Perspective

  4. Models • EMERGE Model (Boston 1977) • Duluth Model (Minnesota) • Amend Model (Colorado) • Solution-focused Approach (Dr. Mo Yee Lee ) • A psycho-educational approach for individuals and couples (Robert Geffner with Carol Manooth) • 婚姻暴力犯之治療方案(Taiwan)

  5. Duluth Model • Core Elements • Format • Content • Facilitator

  6. Core Elements • Take responsibility • Reeducation • Power & Control • Cognitive-behavioral Approach

  7. Format • Open Group • 24 Weeks

  8. Content: The Eight Themes of the Curriculum • Non-violence • Non-threatening Behavior • Respect • Support and Trust • Accountability and Honesty • Sexual Respect • Partnership • Negotiation and Fairness

  9. Facilitator • Gender • Role of Monitoring • Qualification

  10. Observation & Criticism • Victims’ Safety / Support Group • Facilitators • Multi-cultural • Follow up • Effectiveness

  11. Effectiveness • Drop out rate 50% • Recidivism 40%(Shepard, 1992) 45.9% (Saunders, 1996)

  12. Reference: • Pence, E. & Paymar, M.(1993) “Education group for men who batter: The Duluth model” New York: Springer • Yeung ,C. (Ed.) (2002) Proceedings & Documentary Film: Training Workshop on “Treatment of Batterers in Family Violence” (24-26 October 2000) Harmony House • Geffner, R., & Mantooth, C. (2000)”Ending Spouse / Partner Abuse – A Psychoeducational Approach fo Individuals and Couples” Springer • Lee, M. Y., Sebold, J., & Uken, A.(2003) “Solution-Focused Treatment of Domestic Violence Offenders” Oxford • 林明傑, 黃志中著(2003) 「他們怎麼了? 家庭暴力加害人的評估與輔導」 濤石

More Related