Download
1 / 6
60 likes | 172 Vues
This critical analysis explores the contrasting viewpoints of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and physician experience in managing patient decisions. While EBM emphasizes data from randomized clinical trials, physician experience often relies on anecdotal evidence and personal judgment. Despite their differences, both concepts aim for optimal patient care. Understanding these approaches is crucial for integrating rigorous research with clinical expertise, ensuring well-informed healthcare practices. This synthesis promises to enhance decision-making in medical settings through a balanced application of both methodologies.
E N D
Healthcare: Critical Analysis of Evidence-Based Medicine vs. Physician Experience
Introduction • Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM)vs. Physician Experience views are variously approached • Both are geared towards patient management of decisions • Scholars have held diametrically contrary opinion towards patient management decisions • However, a clear understanding between the two concepts is important for clinical practices
Significance • The concepts have over the time been endorsed by medical and pharmacological scholars • for the purpose of providing best clinical practices, the concepts are significant areas of study and understanding • However, the two concepts are contradictory in nature • For instance, EBM is based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) while physician experience focuses on experienced based medicine
Literature Review • EBM focuses on optimizing patient decision based on well conducted research and thus, goes beyond the epistemological evidence • The EBM uses strong type of meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized control trials • physician experience does not focus on any distinctive control and thus, lacks rigor • physician experience relies more on anecdotes leaving many open ended questions
Literature review CON’T • During emergencies that requires life and death decisions, both concepts narrow down to specific question • Choice of decision is based on available data • The physician experience, however, provides little documentation and, thus, focuses on analogy and pertinent data • EBM employs existing evidence to make decisions about the individual patients
Conclusion • The practice between the two involves integration of clinical experience with the best existing external clinical evidence derived from extensive systematic study • However, the EBM views physician experience’s opinions as limited by knowledge gap and biasness • Therefore, additional evidence derived from scientific literature is paramount for best clinical practices
