1 / 43

Physics Potential of LHCb

Physics Potential of LHCb. ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE PHYSICS AT LHC 6 - 12 July 2003, Prague. Physics Motivation. Precise determination of the CKM parameters through phase measurements Search for New Physics beyond the SM by overconstraining the Unitarity Triangles.

hardingt
Télécharger la présentation

Physics Potential of LHCb

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Physics Potential of LHCb ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE PHYSICS AT LHC 6 - 12 July 2003, Prague

  2. Physics Motivation • Precise determination of the CKM parameters through phase measurements • Search for New Physics beyond the SM by overconstraining the Unitarity Triangles • high precision CP measurements including • pure hadronic and multibody final states • measure CP in new decay channels • including Bs decays • look for rare and loop-suppressed B-decays • trigger and reconstruct many different channels • 2BdJ/ KS • 2+Bd D*  •  and  Bd    , Bs  K K • -2Bs Ds K • 2 BsJ/   Bd    Bd    other Bd  K*  Bd  K*  Bs   ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  3. b d, s d,s b Example for manifestation of New Physics u, c, t Bd : arg M12= 2 + bdNP CP in Bd  J/ KS sin (2 + bdNP) CP in Bd  D* sin (2 +  + bdNP) b d, s new particles u, c, t d,s b Bs : arg M12= 2 + bsNP CP in Bs  J/ sin (2 + bsNP) CP in Bs  DsK sin (2 +  + bsNP)   can be disentangled from New Physics effects ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  4. 1 yr LHCb 2007 now Bdpp BdJ/yKS BsJ/yf BsDsK Discovery potential with one year of LHCb 2007 |Vtd/Vts| B-factories and Tevatron  • and  poorly known |Vub/Vcb| 1 yr LHCb  ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  5. - • LHC: • pp collisions at s = 14 TeV • total ~ 100 mb  interaction rate ~ 2 x107/s • multiple pp interactions per bunch crossing • inel~ 80 mb, bb~ 500 b  S/B ~ 1% • forward production of bb, correlated bb angular production - – _ • ~1012 bb events per year with full efficiency at LHC start-up B production at LHC inelastic pp interactions per bunch crossing • LHCb: • single arm spectrometer •  12 mrad <  < 300 mrad (1.8 <  < 4.9) • efficient trigger and clean events, • minimize radiation damage •  work mostly with single interactions • at a nominal L~2x1032cm-2s-1 tunable! • (defocussed beams at LHCb IP) ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  6. Requirements to Detector BdK*g HIGH STATISTICS BdJ/y r 0 • efficient trigger for many B decay topologies leptonic final states  Muon System, ECAL+Preshower (e.g. J/ KS) hadronic final states  HCAL (e.g. , K, DsK etc.) high pt -particles with large impact parameter  Vertex Locator, Trigger Tracker • efficient particle identification  RICH (K separation between 1GeV<p<100GeV) • good decay time resolution  Vertex Locator (e.g. ~40fs for BsDs and B) • good mass resolution  Tracker and Magnet (e.g. 14MeV for BsDs, 18MeV for Bd) ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  7. Overview and Status of Detector • LHCb Letter of Intent  Feb 1996 • Technical Proposal approved  Sep 1998 • Technical Design Reports of all detector subsystems  2000–2002 • LHCb re-optimization & Trigger TDRs Sep 2003 • detector construction has started in 2002 Aperture: ~15–300 (250) mrad 1.8 < |  | < 4.9 40%Xo , 12% lI ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  8. MC Pythia 6.2 tuned on CDF and UA5 data • Multiple pp interactions and spill-over effects included • Complete description of material from TDRs • Individual detector responses tuned on test beam results • Complete pattern recognition in reconstruction Status of Simulation VELO TT Magnet event from GEANT3 simulation T1-T3 • All numbers preliminary, final numbers in re-optimization TDR in September ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  9. Magnet • dipole • warm Al conductor • 4 Tm integrated field • 4.2 MW • 1450 t yoke • All components delivered • Underground assembly ongoing ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  10. Vertex Locator (VELO) • 21 stations, retractable during injection • sensitive area starts at only 8 mm • from beam axis • R/φ sensors (single sided, 45º sectors). • pitch ranges from 37 μm to 103 μm. • 220 μm thin silicon. • 180k readout channels stand-alone tracking! sensors r-sensors -sensors beam- pipe SCTA RF-box Beetle Al window ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  11. Impact Parameter Resolution impact parameter resolution vs pT Primary Vertex: z ~ 47m x ~ y~ 8 m average decay length: 1 cm for Bd track multiplicity vs pT ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  12. Proper Time Resolution measure Bs mixing with >5 up to 48 ps-1 (xs=75) in 1 year Proper time resolution for BsDs: ~ 44 fs ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  13. Main Tracker (TT, IT, OT) Inner Tracker • 3 stations with • 4 layers each • 320 thin silicon • 198 readout pitch • 130k readout ch. Outer Tracker ~65 m2 Trigger Tracker • 3 stations with • 4 double layers • 5mm straw tubes • 50k readout ch. ~1.41.2 m2 • 2*2 layers • 500 silicon • 198 r/o pitch • 144k readout ch. ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  14. Tracking Performance Ghost rate vs pTcut Efficiency vs p Ghost rate vs pcut Long Tracks Long Tracks Long Tracks average ghost rate ~ 9% for pT>0.5 GeV/c => ghost rate ~ 3%. for p>10 GeV => efficiency > 94% ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  15. Momentum and Mass resolutions <p> resolution B-tracks σ = 0.37% momentum resolution vs p mass resolution for BsDs Ds->KK  ~ 14 MeV/c2 ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  16. Particle Identification with RICH • Requirements: • Background suppression => high momentum hadrons in two-body B decays • B flavour tagging (identify K from bcs) => low momentum hadrons • RICH system divided into 2 detectors ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  17. RICH detectors RICH1 5cm aerogel n = 1.03 4 m3 C4F10 n = 1.0014 RICH2 100 m3 CF4 n = 1.0005 (construction started) Super-Structure Exit Window Entrance Window Mirrors Photon Detectors Magnetic Shielding ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  18. RICH performance [for selected Bs Ds(KKp) K] ( 2< p< 100 GeV )  separation between  and K hypothesis vs p ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  19. Background rejection with RICH BsKK Bs Ds K ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  20. Requirements: • Preshower (PS) and • Scintillator Pad Detector (SPD): • PID for L0 electron and photon trigger • electron,photon/pion separation by PS • photon/MIP separation by SPD • charged multiplicity veto by SPD • ECAL: • Et of electrons and photons for L0 trigger • (e.g. BJ/ Ks, B K*) • reconstruction of 0 and prompt  offline • particle ID • HCAL: • Et of hadrons for L0 trigger • (e.g. B, B DsK) • particle ID • L0 trigger => Calorimeters readout every 25ns Calorimeters Y~7m X~8.5m PS/SPD HCAL ECAL Z~2.7m ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  21. Calorimeters ECAL (70% delivered) 5952 channels, 25 X0 “shashlik” type modules 66 layers of 2mm Pb/ 4mm scintillator readout via WLS fibers Preshower (production started) 2.5 X0 lead converter sandwiched between two scintillator planes with 2x5952 scintillating pads HCAL (15% delivered) 1468 channels, longitudinal-tiles, 5.6  6mm master/4mm spacer, 3mm scintillator readout via WLS fibers ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  22. Calorimeters performance Energy resolution of series modules measured in testbeam HCAL ECAL  E E E GeV ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  23. m(0) ~ 9 MeV/c2 Performance on selected B+-0 Two resolved clusters One merged cluster m(0) ~14 MeV/c2 conversions combined reconstruction efficiency ~50% ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  24. Performance on selected B+-0 Two resolved clusters One merged cluster m(B+ -0) ~72 MeV/c2 m(B+-0) ~72 MeV/c2  ~75 fs  ~75 fs ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  25. ECAL E( ) /P nearest cluster Electron identification Preshower E-deposit Combined PID with Calorimeters and RICH [from selected BsJ/(ee)KS] physics performance: El. Eff. = 78% ;  mis-ID rate 1.0% • ~95% for electrons (within calo acceptance) BsJ/(ee)  misidentification rate ~0.7% ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  26. Muon system Requirements: Identify and trigger on muons from decay of B-mesons: B X In particular: BdJ/(+-) Ks ; BsJ/(+-)  ; Bs +- • 4 (1) stations with 4 (2) layers/station • stations M1+M2 for Pt measurement, • M2+M3 for trigger track seed, • M4+M5 for muon track finding • 435m2 of detector area, 1380 chambers • ~26k readout channels • hadron absorber thickness of 21  HCAL ECAL MWPC Muon Stations ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  27. ~90% for muons (within muon system acceptance)  misidentification rate ~1% Muon identification [from selected BsJ/()KS] Bs  J/() physics performance:  Eff. = 86%  mis-ID rate 1.0% ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  28. pile-up B BsDsK Signal Min. Bias Trigger strategy 40 MHz  Level-0 Calorimeters Muon System Pile-up veto pT of  , h, e,  1 MHz  Level-1 Vertex Locator Trigger Tracker Level-0 objects impact parameter rough pT (~20%) 40 KHz  High-Level Full detector information final state reconstruction 200 Hz  Output ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  29. commercial hardware • flexible (L1 HLT) • scalable  easy upgrade Trigger implementation L0 = synchronized hardware trigger L1 = CPU based, asynchronous software trigger, common design with High-Level Triggerand DAQ ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  30. L0 efficiency (%) on ‘selected’ events e, m h all B->pp 8 16 51 57 Bs->DsK 10 12 44 52 Bs->J/y(ee)KS 6 35 23 48 Bs->J/y(mm)f 89 9 21 90 Bs->K*g 10 70 34 76 L1 and L0xL1 efficiencies (%) L1 L0xL1 B->pp 60 34 Bs->DsK 56 29 Bs->J/y(ee)KS 44 21 Bs->J/y(mm)f 71 64 Bs->K*g 46 35 Trigger performance • fast (40MHz) • robust and flexible (does not rely on a single sub-detector) • triggers on many B decay topologies including hadronic and neutral final states preliminary ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  31. det :detection eff. (incl. geom. acc. in 4 and all material effects) • rec/det: reconstruction efficiency on detected events (track finding eff., neutral cluster rec.) • sel/rec: efficiency of offline selection cuts on reconstructed events (rejecting background) • trig/sel: combined L0+L1 efficiency on offline selected events (including pile-up veto rate reduction) • B/S from 10 million incl. bb back. Channel e tot Yield B/S B0 p+p- 0.71% 27 k <0.7 B0 K+ p- 0.96 % 139 k 0.10±0.03 Bs K+ K- 1.02 % 38 k <0.3 Bs Ds-p+ 0.31 % 87 k 0.55±0.15 Bs Ds-K+ 0.62 % 6.1 k<4.2 Bs J/y (m-m+ )f 1.67 % 100 k <0.3 166 k 0.61±0.09 B0  J/y (m-m+) KS 1.07 % B0 p 0.03 % 4 k <7 B0 K0* g 0.16 % 35 k <0.7 0.22 % Bs f  9.4 k <2.4 1 year = 2 fb -1 L = 2x1032 cm–2s-1 Event reconstruction and yields preliminary tot = edet* erec/det* esel/rec* etrig/sel= 12.2% * 91.6% * 19.6% * 32.6% = 0.71% ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  32. p+ p- B0 Knowledge of flavour at birth is essential for the majority of CP measurements B0 D K- l b Bs0 s b sources for wrong tags: Bd-Bd mixing (opposite side) b  c  l (lepton tag) conversions… s K+ u u εtag [%] ωtag [%] εeff [%] Combining tags Bdp p 41 35 4 Bs K K 48 33 6 Flavour tagging tagging strategy: • opposite side lepton tag ( b l) • opposite side kaon tag ( b  c  s ) (RICH, hadron trigger) • same side kaon tag (for Bs) • vertex charge tagging (for charged B) preliminary effective efficiency: eff= tag(1-2tag)2 ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  33. “gold-plated” decay channel at B-factories for measuring the Bd- Bd mixing phase • needed for extracting  from B   and Bs  K K, or from B  D* • in SM 0, non-vanishing value (0.01) could be a signal of Physics Beyond SM • precision measurement important  from B J/ Ks ( see talk by Jeroen Van Hunen) in 1 year: () ~0.6 B J/() Ks (untagged) in 1 year: expected signal events 166 k expected background 101 k ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  34. “gold-plated” decay channel for hadron machines, measuring the Bs- Bs mixing phase • in SM s= -2 = -22 expected to be (0.03) • large CP asymmetry would signal Physics Beyond SM • also needed for extracting  from B   and Bs  K K, or from Bs Ds K  from Bs  J/  ( see talk by Jeroen Van Hunen) J/  is not a pure CP eigenstate • 2 CP even, 1 CP odd amplitudes contributing • need to fit angular distributions of decay final states as function of proper time • requires very good proper time resolution M(KK)= 15 MeV/c2 = 38 fs in 1 year: s (dg) ~ 3.5o with input values: etag: 40% , wtag: 35% , Dms=20/ps t = 1.5 ps , DG/G = 0.1 , A = sin(-2dg) = 0.03 ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  35. Measure time-dependent CP asymmetries to extract and  from B    and Bs  K K ( see talk by Angelo Carbone) • relies on “U-spin” symmetry assumption (ds), which is the only source of theoretical uncertainty [R.Fleischer, Phys.Lett. B459, 306 (1999)] • determination of  and test of U-spin symmetry using measurements of  from Bs J/  and from B  J/ KS • sensitive to New Physics contribution by comparing withobtained from Ds K • hadron trigger • K/ separation • mass resolution (~18 MeV/c2) • proper-time resolution B0s KK B0  ~ 40 fs B0s KK ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  36.  from B    and Bs  K K input values sensitivity in 1 year BS K K B   ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  37. 1y 2y 3y 4y years 1 2 3 4 () 5.5 3.3 2.6 2.2  from B    and Bs  K K unique solution graphical solution in (d,)-plane • d = 2from B  J/ KSand s = 2 fromBs J/  • d,(d’,’)paramatrize P over T amplitude ratio of decay transitions in Bd  (Bs K+K-) • exact U-spin symmetry =>d =d’;=’ • 3 unknowns and 4 measurements 4 years 95% confidence region for d and  for =60 , d=d’=0.4 , =’=140 , d=51 , s=0 ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  38. 2 time dependent asymmetries from 4 decay rates: Bs (Bs)  D-sK+, D+sK- • only 2 tree-diagram-like topologies of same magnitude contribute • large interference effects expected [bc and bu diagrams (3)] • needs supression of (20) times higher Bs Ds background K or + Bs0 K+ Ds∓ 144 m  440 m 47m expected sensitivity in 1 year: () ~ 150 for Dms = 20 ps–1 () ~ 200 for Dms = 30 ps–1 - 2 from Bs  Ds K ( see talk by Richard White) important: hadron trigger, PID, proper-time resolution •  sensitivity depends on • relative amplitudes • strong phase difference • values of , ms,, s/s ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  39. g W b u,c,t s ( see talk by Galina Pakhlova) B0 K0* and Bs   In SM: • loop-suppressed bs transitions • BR( B0 K*0 ) = (4.30.4) 10-5 • expected direct CP violation <1% for B0 K*0  • expected CP violation in mixing ~0 for Bs   sensitive to New Physics m~ 64 MeV/c2  ~ 60 fs Preliminary study: • for BK 0* (ACP ) < 0.01 for one year LHCb • for Bs  sensitivity study ongoing B K  Bs KK  In one year expect triggered and reconstructed 35k eventsB0 K0* (K+p-) g ; S/B>1.4 9.4k events Bs (K+K+)  ; S/B>0.4 ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  40.  invariant mass resolution B0 K0*  ( see talk by Jose Helder Lopes) • BR( B0 K*0) = (1.20.4) 10-6 • within SM measure |Vts| • forward-backward asymmetry sensitive to New Physics, largely independent of hadronic uncertainties FBA angle between B momentum and +in the dilepton center-of-mass system FBA resolution In one year expect 4.4k eventsB0 K0*   triggered and reconstructed with S/B >0.45 Preliminary study: •  (ACP ) ~ 0.02 for one year LHCb • sensitivity study for AFB ongoing ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  41. precision measurement of mass, life-time • possible CP withBc  J/D, Bc  DsD, DD, ... • LHCb acceptance ~30% p (GeV) Preliminary study: s(ppBc) ~300 nb 109 Bc/ year Bc  J/y p (BR ~10-2) e ~ 3%18k events/year, S/B ~10 Background from B J/y X and prompt J/y reduced cutting on the distance between primary vertex and Bc vertex M( J/y(mm) p) GeV/c2 Bc mesons CDF: mBc= 6.4  0.4 GeV, tBc~ 0.5 ps ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  42. Present estimate of expected physics reach These numbers are being updated, and more channels studied, in the re-optimization of the LHCb detector to be concluded in September 2003 preliminary channel parameters(1 year)depending onLHCb specific features Bd J/y KSb0.6for sin(2b)=0.79lepton trigger Bdp+ p-g~5.5U-spin summetryhadron trigger, RICH BsKKhadron trigger, RICH,  Bs Ds Kg ~15-20xs,DGs/Gs, dT1,T2hadron trigger, RICH,  Bs J/y dg ~3.5xs, CP+/CP-,d1,2lepton trigger,  Bs Ds pxs <75s>5hadron trigger, Bd K* mm4.4keventsmuon trigger,RICH Bd K* g 35keventsphoton trigger, RICH Bs    9.4k events photon trigger, RICH,   ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

  43. Summary and Conclusion • LHCb can study many different B-meson decay modes with high precision • particle identification capability • excellent mass and decay-time resolution • LHCb can fully exploit the large B-meson yields at LHC from the start-up • flexible, robust and efficient trigger • required luminosity of 2x1032 is low and locally tuneable • LHCb detector will be ready for data taking in 2007 at LHC start-up • detector production is on schedule • installation of magnet is ongoing • installation of detectors will start end of next year  Soon LHCb will offer an excellent opportunity to • determine precisely the CKM parameters through phase measurements • spot New Physics beyond the SM by overconstraining the Unitarity Triangles ADVANCED STUDIES INSTITUTE: PHYSICS AT LHC

More Related