1 / 7

Violence and Impulsivity Reduction for High Risk Boys through Meditative Martial Arts

Violence and Impulsivity Reduction for High Risk Boys through Meditative Martial Arts. Gail Zivin, Ph.D., Thomas Jefferson University Nimr R. Hassan , Koga Ha Kosho Shorei Ryu Kempo Assoc. of Phila. Geraldine F. DePaula, M.D ., Thomas Jefferson University

harken
Télécharger la présentation

Violence and Impulsivity Reduction for High Risk Boys through Meditative Martial Arts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Violence and Impulsivity Reduction for High Risk Boys through Meditative Martial Arts Gail Zivin, Ph.D., Thomas Jefferson University Nimr R. Hassan, Koga Ha Kosho Shorei Ryu Kempo Assoc. of Phila. Geraldine F. DePaula, M.D., Thomas Jefferson University Carmen Harlan, M.D.,Thomas Jefferson University Daniel A. Monti, M.D., Thomas Jefferson University Kashfia D. Hossain, M.D., Thomas Jefferson University Ksai Patterson, M.S., Widener University Funding from the Huston Foundation

  2. Changes in Teachers’ Ratings of Negative Behaviors 0.10 0.00 -0.10 -0.20 Nonstudent Student -0.30 Changes on Sutter-Eyberg Inventory -0.40 -0.50 Impulsive Violent Inappropriate -0.60

  3. Changes in Attention 8 7 6 5 4 Nonstudent 3 Student Test Changes in IVA Continuous Performance 2 1 0 -1 -2 Vig. (V) Vig. (A) p<.05 Pru. (V) Pru. (A)

  4. Changes in Self Report 0.2 0.15 0.1 Changes inPiers-Harris Self Concept Interview 0.05 0 -0.05 Calm Happyp<05 Schl wrk p<003 Conduct Popular -0.1

  5. Changes in Teachers Ratings ofNegative Behaviors and Follow-Up 0.40 0.20 0.00 -0.20 Nonstudents, after wait Students, after course Changes on Sutter-Eyberg Inventory Students, after wait Nonstudents, after course -0.40 -0.60 -0.80 -1.00 I mpulsive Violent Resists Rules Inappropriate

  6. Changes in Attention and Follow-Up 10 8 6 4 2 Nonstudents, after wait 0 Students, after course IVA Attention Test Changes from Baseline Students, after wait -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 Pru(V) Vig (A) Pru (V) Pru (A) -12

  7. Changes in Attention and Follow-Up 10 8 6 4 2 Nonstudents, after wait 0 Students, after course IVA Attention Test Changes from Baseline Students, after wait -2 Nonstudents, after course -4 -6 -8 -10 Pru(V) Vig (A) Pru (V) Pru (A) -12

More Related