Towards Phase 2 TP releases 2013 Didier Contardo , Jeff Spalding

1. Towards Phase 2 TP releases 2013Didier Contardo, Jeff Spalding Status of current simulations studies and ongoing issues Needs for TP preparation

2. Aging and Luminosity scenarios for MC production UPO Apr. 19 Note: in addition, for reference aging studies, some detectors want to have MC of the integrate luminosity points at 0 pile-up

3. Aging and Luminosity scenarios for MC production UPO Apr. 19

4. Plans for simulation studies: Snowmass WP and ECFA Workshop • Targeting Snowmass , ECFA • Full Simulation (for ECFA workshop) • HH  bbγγ and VBF H  ττ • Phase 1 detector 140 pile-up w/o Calo aging (samples becoming available) • Phase 2 new Tracker 140 pile-up no Calo aging (need track reconstruction) • Delphes near term studies (with pileup model, and resolutions as input) • VBF H  ττto validate against full simulation • Full program of Higgs & BSM benchmarks selected for Snowmass/ECFA • Sample production very fast, configurations very flexible • Upgrade with current Calo and HF geometry – study performance with enhanced EE/HB resolution/granularity and high ηTracking • Upgrade with Calo and tracking ηextension (w/o HF plug) • Fast Simulation (tool is now working, include new tracker with ηextension) • VBF Hττ to validate against Full Simulation and compare with Delphes • Add calorimeter parameterization and η extension and muonη extension  Targeting Technical Proposal (readiness by end 2013) • Fast Simulation + track reconstruction and/or Full Simulation to be decided soon? DESY week (Friday)

5. WGM following DESY week Phase 2 Scope Consideration(following Upgrade Week workshop at DESY June3-7, 2013) New Tracker Barrel-EndCap (silicon and pixels) L1 Trigger Upgrade Endcap/Forward Calorimeters Muons Complete 1.6<η<2.4 EE/EB FE DT minicrates New EE - HE same absorber, new active elements New EE and HE extended η coverage* “10µs , 0.5MHz” CSC FEB Extend pixel η coverage “20µs , 1MHz” Extend muonη range New HF Maintain current HF Push (Si TK)/Pull (Pixel) Track Trigger Also: Shielding and Infrastructure + YB0 services + Trigger/DAQ … • Key: • Red indicates primary scope consideration • Green indicates options under study • Notes: • * Technical & radiological implications of extending endcaph range are under investigation • Shutdown duration and logistics, and staging options are under consideration • Cost assessment and physics performance studies are ongoing R&D on precision timing is considered an option for calorimeter upgrades

6. Physics benchmarks for Snowmass WP and ECFA Workshop EB (Jun 18) Chris Hill

7. Physics benchmarks for ECFA Workshop ECFA PG (Jun 21)

8. Delphes: Phase 2 detector scenarios for Snowmass WP and ECFA Workshop Configuration 1a Corresponds to the Phase I MC Used to compare the full analysis of the bench mark analyses between Delphes and FullSim Phase I Configuration 1bCorresponds to the Phase I MC with aging Used for extended studies of aged Phase I detector to motivate upgradeConfiguration 2a Corresponds to Scenario 1 (replace EE and retrofit HE) Use EE shashlik resolution and transverse size Increase phi segmentation for HE to 4x (demonstrate impact) Use Phase II tracker (barrel + endcap) Complete muon coverage 1.6 < η < 2.4 Exclude η > 4.5 to simulate radiation damage in HF Configuration 2b Same as configuration 2a but with extended tracker Configuration 3 Corresponds to Scenario 2 (replace the Endcap) Extended coverage (tracker + calorimeter + muon) η ~ 4 Use same segmentation and resolution as for 2a Exclude η > 4.5 to simulate radiation damage in HF USSTF June 19

9. Full and Fast Simulation: Phase 2 detector scenarios • Window for MC production for the TP is beginning of 2014 • Document for the CWR should be ready July 2014  Need a release for performance studies by end of 2013 • Phase 2 Scenario 1 • New tracker BE7 or 5 • Generic EE + HE (retrofit) + HF (eta<4.5) • Muons 1.6<eta<2.4 • w/o pixel extension up to 4 • Phase 2 Scenario 2 • New tracker BE7 or 5 • Generic integrated forward calorimeter • Muons 1.6<eta<2.4 • w/o pixel/calo/muon(tagging) extension up to 4 • L1-Trigger with crystal granularity, tracks and high bandwidth Notes: • Geometry and Reconstruction code are identical for Full and Fast simulations • Generic Calorimetry means: variable transverse and longitudinal segmentations - can be collapsed in reconstruction - resolutions are parameterized For discussion

10. Full and Fast simulation studies: Target dates for integrated releases For discussion • ECFA studies • Full simulation with BE7/5 Geometries and Tracking (HH  bbγγ and VBF H  ττ) •  ready for MC production second week of July ? • Fast simulation with BE7/5 Geometry + Pixel extension + EE geometry + HE without aging + Current HF (eta<4.5) + Tracking + first GED version (cross check Delphes) •  ready for MC production second week of July ? • Phase 1 trigger emulation •  ? • TP studies • Full/Fast simulation complete scenario 1 and scenario 2 geometries •  End of Sept. • Full/Fast simulation Reconstruction and GED •  End of Oct. (Upgrade week) • Phase 2 Trigger primitives and algorithms •  End of Oct. (Upgrade week) • Full/Fast simulation release for TP MC production •  End of December

11. Status at UPO June 28 2013 • Still open questions for ECFA - RRB and beyond  approval at Taipei Sept 9 • Tuning ECAL reconstruction with aging? staging scenarios? • HCAL phase 1 reconstruction and aging studies ? does HE survive LS2/LS3 • Tracking phase 2 ? Needed for ECFA full simulation studies • Fast simulation with extensions - parameterized calorimetry? validate Delphes - first simulations with both new Tracker and Forward Calorimeters • Trigger emulation Phase 1 ? Muons, stage 2 algorithms • TP preparation need • Tracker new pixel with extension • Forward Calorimeter scenarios Geometry and local reconstruction • Muon completion and extension • Global Reconstruction (physics object reconstruction tuning) • Trigger emulation Phase 2 ? New primitives and algorithms • Analyses: tuning for high PU • Projects (TK, ECAL, HCAL, Muons) & Working Groups (TPS, FD) to provide their plan (commitment with steps - delivery dates & names of responsible) For discussion