1 / 30

2 k Factorial & Central Composite Designs

2 k Factorial & Central Composite Designs. The American University in Cairo Interdisciplinary Engineering Program ENGR 592: Probability & Statistics. Presented to: Presented by: Dr. Lotfi K. Gaafar Ghada Moustafa Gad 592 Class. Factorial Designs.

harsha
Télécharger la présentation

2 k Factorial & Central Composite Designs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2k Factorial &Central Composite Designs The American University in Cairo Interdisciplinary Engineering Program ENGR 592: Probability & Statistics Presented to: Presented by: Dr. Lotfi K. Gaafar Ghada Moustafa Gad 592 Class

  2. Factorial Designs Allow the effect of each and every factor to be tested and estimated independently with the interactions also assessed. Factorial Design Full Factorial Design 2k Full Factorial Design 2k Fractional Factorial Design Mirror Image Fold over Design

  3. Factorial Designs A factorial design in which every setting of every factor appears with every setting of every other factor Factorial Design Full Factorial Design 2k Full Factorial Design 2k Fractional Factorial Design Mirror Image Fold over Design

  4. Factorial Designs Designs having all input factors set at two levels each. These levels are called high/+1 and low/-1 Factorial Design Full Factorial Design 2k Full Factorial Design 2k Fractional Factorial Design Mirror Image Fold over Design

  5. Factorial Designs Only an adequately chosen fraction of the treatment combinations required for the complete factorial experiment are selected to be run Factorial Design Full Factorial Design 2k Full Factorial Design 2k Fractional Factorial Design Mirror Image Fold over Design

  6. Factorial Designs Factorial with the number of runs in the follow up experiment equal to the original. Fractional factorial designs are augmented by reversing the signs of all the columns of the original design matrix Factorial Design Full Factorial Design 2k Full Factorial Design 2k Fractional Factorial Design Mirror Image Fold over Design

  7. 2k Full Factorial Design • # of runs required = 2 # of factors

  8. 2k Full Factorial Design • Standard Order Matrix 22

  9. 2k Full Factorial Design • Analysis Matrix 22 • Dot product for any pair of columns is 0 Orthogonality Balanced Property

  10. Fractional Factorial Design ½ space • 23 = 8 runs • 23-1 = 4 runs X3 Defining Relation

  11. Fractional Factorial Design ½ space • 23 = 8 runs • 23-1 = 4 runs X3 Confounding

  12. Fractional Factorial Design A schedule for conducting runs of an experimental study such that any effects on the experimental results due to a known change in raw materials, operators, etc. become concentrated in the levels of the blocking variable Blocking Effect Resolution

  13. Fractional Factorial Design It is the length of the smallest interaction among the set of defining relations. It describes the degree to which the estimated main effects are confounded with the estimated interactions. Blocking Effect Resolution

  14. Factorial Design Features • Ideal for screening design objective • Simple and economical for small number of factors. • 2k fractional factorial designs if properly chosen to can be balanced and orthogonal. • Fractional Factorial designs has low number of runs compared to high information obtained. • Most popular designs However...

  15. Factorial Design Features • A two-level experiment can not fit quadratic effects

  16. Case Example:Fold-over Fractional Factorial Design The aim of the study is to find the factors affecting the time to peddle a bicycle up a hill. Screening experiment. Set Objectives Select Variables & Levels Select Design Evaluate Results

  17. Case Example:Fold-over Fractional Factorial Design Set Objectives Select Variables & Levels Select Design Evaluate Results

  18. Case Example:Fold-over Fractional Factorial Design Set Objectives Select Variables & Levels 7 factors  27= 128 Limitation  8 runs Select Design Evaluate Results

  19. Case Example:Fold-over Fractional Factorial Design 4 5 6 7 Resolution III 23 27- 4

  20. Case Example:Fold-over Fractional Factorial Design Set Objectives 2 and 4 are significant. 4 confounded by 12 ? 1 & 14 could be significant?  Fold over design Select Variables & Levels Select Design Evaluate Results

  21. Case Example:Fold-over Fractional Factorial Design 4 5 6 7 Augmenting Resolution III Resolution IV

  22. Central Composite Designs • CCD fall under the classical quadratic designs category where fractional plan is used to fit a second order equation • They start with a factorial or a fractional factorial design (with center points) and then star points or axial points are added to estimate curvature

  23. Central Composite Designs • Rotatability • Most important criterion • Means that the standard error value of the points located at same distance from the center of the region is the same. • It is a measure of uncertainty of a predicted response

  24. CCD Designs Circumscribed Central Composite Face Centered Central Composite Inscribed Central Composite

  25. CCD General Features • Most types are rotatable • Minimizes the error of prediction. • Good lack of fit detection. • Suitable for blocking. • Good graphical analysis through simple data patterns. • Provides information on variable effects and experimental error with minimum number of runs. • Sequential construction of higher order designs from simpler designs to estimate curvature effects.

  26. Case Example: CCD The aim is to find the best ratio of the two admixtures to be used as a super plasticizer for cement to obtain optimal workability. Response surface methodology Set Objectives Select Variables & Levels Select Design Evaluate Results

  27. Case Example:CCD Set Objectives Select Variables & Levels Select Design Evaluate Results

  28. Case Example: CCD Since RSM  High quality prediction Larger process space  Circumscribed Central Composite Design  Extremes generated are reasonable =>O.K. Set Objectives Select Variables & Levels Select Design Evaluate Results

  29. Case Example: CCC

  30. Thank you…Questions?

More Related