1 / 21

Results from CCSSE 2009: An Overview

Results from CCSSE 2009: An Overview. Mary Kate Quinlan August 10, 2009. Introduction. The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Focus - institutional practices and student behaviors that promote student engagement

hawa
Télécharger la présentation

Results from CCSSE 2009: An Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Results from CCSSE 2009:An Overview Mary Kate Quinlan August 10, 2009

  2. Introduction • The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) • Focus - institutional practices and student behaviors that promote student engagement • Benchmarks - 38 of the most important survey items are grouped into five conceptually related categories of high-quality educational practices • 2nd administration – able to measure improvement

  3. 2007 CCSSE Benchmarks

  4. Changes in Benchmark Scores Benchmark scores are standardized with a median of 50.0

  5. 2009 CCSSE Benchmarks

  6. Actual Changes – Raw Scores

  7. Active and Collaborative Learning

  8. Support for Learners

  9. Student-Faculty Interaction

  10. Student Effort

  11. Academic Challenge

  12. Impact of ATD Initiatives

  13. Early Intervention • Support for Learners – slight increase in raw benchmark score • Use of services vs. importance of services for students in ATD population - decrease • Use services less often • Place greater importance on services

  14. Increase Group Work in the Classroom • Active and Collaborative Learning – slight increase in raw benchmark score • 4f. Students – 3% increase (37% to 40%) • 4f. Faculty – 2% improvement • 55% spend little to no time on group activities • P/T 52% • F/T 61%

  15. Promote Awareness of Services • 9b. Providing the support you need2% decrease (64% to 62%) • 13.1 Use of services – slight increases in the use of services for 10 of the 11. Slight decrease in tutoring.

  16. Increase Engagement Outside the Classroom • 4g. Work with students outside of class – 5% increase (13% to 18%)

  17. Headlines

  18. Biggest Improvement 4g. Work with students outside of class

  19. Room for Improvement Academic Challenge • According to students they are required to read less and their exams are not as challenging • 6a. Number of assigned textbooks, books or book-length packs of course readings 2007 – 2.932009 – 2.73 • 7. Extent to which your examinations challenged you to do your best work2007 – 5.072009 – 4.87

  20. 2009 Timeline

  21. Thank You Contact: Mary Kate Quinlan 412-237-3196 mquinlan@cca.edu Questions?

More Related