1 / 53

FSI Level IV

TAB TWELVE. FSI Level IV. Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2011. THEMES for 2010-2011. Data Analysis & Dialogue and Decision-making Data Director and D4SS Shared Leadership, Shared Ownership Culture Building to Support CSI Implementation and Monitoring SIP

hea
Télécharger la présentation

FSI Level IV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TAB TWELVE FSI Level IV Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2011

  2. THEMES for 2010-2011 • Data Analysis & Dialogue and Decision-making • Data Director and D4SS • Shared Leadership, Shared Ownership • Culture Building to Support CSI • Implementation and Monitoring SIP • Evaluating Impact of SIP

  3. FSI Materials • White Binder • MI-CSI Journal • Book Talks: Team to Teach and From Questions to Actions • Data Reference Points Manual • Flashdrive • Plastic Folders • URL Bookmark

  4. Inclusion ActivityThe EAGLE has Landed (MI-CSI)Eagle is a metaphor for You • One person at each team will read the short ppt • First Thought • Share with team what or how you are prepared to help colleagues shift to embrace change Shared from Char-Am ISD, Jennifer Sabsook

  5. Today’s Outcomes • Receive updates, new content, and changes • Participate in a Book Talk: Tools and Talk • Examine the NEW Cut Scores • Identify administrative, teacher, and student behaviors • Network with colleagues • Use work time to reflect, and plan SI initiatives to bring to schools

  6. Today’s Roadmap TAB TWELVE • Welcome • 2011 Themes and Updates • What has Changed • Due Dates and Professional Learning • Common Core State Standards • Monitoring the Impact of Strategy Implementation • SI Progress Monitoring • Data 4 SS/Data Director/MISchooldata • New 2011 Cut Scores are Adopted • Network and Planning

  7. Key Working AgreementsA Facilitation Tool Evidence • Respect all Points of View • Be Present and Engaged • Honor Time Agreements • Get All Voices in the Room These breathe life into our Core Values

  8. Parking LotA Facilitation Tool TAB TWELVE • Rest questions that do not benefit the whole group • Place questionsthat do not pertain to content at this time • Place questions that pertain, but participants do not want to ask at this time

  9. LIVING BELIEF STATEMENT “Networking is not an option, but a critical part of how Facilitators of School Improvement learn and share their learning.”

  10. One Common Voice – One PlanMichigan Continuous School ImprovementStages and Steps (MI-CSI) Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

  11. One Common Voice – One PlanMichigan Continuous School ImprovementStages and StepsI.-III. Comprehensive Needs Assessment Components TAB TWELVE I. School Data Profile/Analysis II. School Process Profile/Analysis III. Summary Report/ Goal Management Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice I.School Data Profile/Analysis II.School Process Profile/Analysis III. Summary Report/ Goal Management

  12. One Common Voice – One PlanMichigan Continuous School ImprovementStages and Steps Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile I. School Data Profile II. School Process Profile Analyze Data I. School Data Analysis II. School Process Analysis III. Summary Report/Goals Management Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop Action Plan Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan TAB TWELVE Gather Comprehensive Needs Assessment Study School Improvement Plan Plan Do

  13. Stage One GATHERStep 1: Getting Ready GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile 4 Considerations • School Culture • Collaborative Inquiry Process • Vision, Mission, Core Values and Belief Statements • School Decision Making • From Decide and Announce to Consensus • Team Building • Stakeholder Analysis • Group vs. Team • School Current Reality • ‘Where Are We?’

  14. Getting Ready, Data Collection/AnalysisImplement and Monitor SI PLAN GATHER, STUDY, & DO 09.07.11 through 03.08.12 Stage One GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Stage Four Stage Two DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

  15. TAB TWELVE Document One Document I (SDP/A) School Data Profile/Analysis Due Online: 09.01.12 Document Two Document II (SPP/A) School Process Profile/Analysis Due Online: 03.09.12 a.MDE:School Process Rubrics 90 b.MDE:School Process Rubrics 40 c.NCA:Assist Self Assessment (Assist SA) d. NCA:Self Assessment (SA) Document III (Summary Report/Goals Management) Summary Report/School Improvement Plan Due Online: 09.01.12 Document Three

  16. School Process Rubrics (SPR)document two TAB TWELVE Two Road Mapswww.advanc-ED.org

  17. TAB TWO BUREAU of Assessment and Accountability (BAA) BAA Resources • BAA Secure Site www.michigan.gov/baa-secure • BAA Professional Learning Site www.michigan.gov/baa-learning • BAA Main Webpage www.michigan.gov/baa • BAA Email Address baa@michigan.gov *OEAA site will remain another 6 months and then will re-route users to the correct BAA resource BAA Fall Assessment handout id on table in white. Take One

  18. 2011-2012 NEW Changes • School Data Profile/Analysis will have all, but 2 sections pre-populated by BAA and CEPI (one is about teachers) • This month State Board of Ed approved the new cut score (MEAP and MME) process for implementation this year (2011-2012) (URL’s provided in the PM today) • BAA has constructed a website that features resources related to “Beating the Odds”, and other resources. These resources can be accessed at http://michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140--254481--,00.html NEW

  19. 2011-2012 NEW Changes • Response to InterventionGuidance Materials • Michigan’s definition and vision for RtI • Essential Components of Michigan’s RtI Framework • MDE Contact: Jan Oord at oordj@michigan.gov • MISD RtI Leadership Team

  20. NEW ChangesAdvancEd Accreditation (2012-2013) EVALUATION Protocol for Accreditation • Organizational Effectiveness • Using FIVE Standards • Stakeholder Perceptions • Perception Surveys will be required (FREE SURVEYS) • Online accessible • Schools Student Performance • State and Local Assessments will be part of the Evaluation • Student Achievement (Growth) • MDE criteria and state specific (Top to Bottom)

  21. 2012 Explore, Plan, and ACTMiddle and High Schools NEW EXPLORE • All 7th graders must test between 05.01.12 - 05.30.12 120 minutes Decommissioned Explore • All 8th graders must test between 03.01.12 – 03.30.12 120 minutes PLAN • All 9th graders must test between 03.01.12 – 03.30.12 120 minutes Decommissioned ACT • All 10th graders must test between03.01.12 – 03.30.12 205 minutes • Includes writing

  22. Important DatesRegister at: www.gomiem.org • 11.08 - 11.09.11 NCA Fall Conference Lansing Center, Lansing • 11.01, 08,14.11 Common Core Rollout Ann Arbor (1), Grand Rapids (8) Saginaw (14) • 11.29.11 MDE Fall Conference Lansing Center, Lansing • 03.29-30.12 MDE/NCA Spring SI Conference Lansing Center, Lansing

  23. Important Dates • Parent Involvement & Title I – Strengthening School, Family & Community Connections 03.21.12 at MISD • Literacy, Learning, and Laughter featuring the Common Core Standards for ELA for all K-12 12.10.11 at MISD • Writing Tracker 11.08.11 at MISD • Text Comprehension 12.13.11 at MISD • Vocabulary 01.31.12 at MISD

  24. REMINDER to REGISTER School Improvement Teams Work Day 04.26.12 Title I only 04.30.12 Title I only 05.01.12 05.02.12 05.03.12 05.08.12

  25. Smarter Balanced ConsortiumComing to a School Near You • Michigan has signed on as one of the governing members • Michigan has a vote, Joseph Martineau (BAA) sits on the board • Upwards of 32 states have signed on • Alternative to the MEAP, 2014-2015 • Appendix A Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy • Paperless by 2018 NEW

  26. Common Core State Standards, Assessments Roll-Out andImplementation Plan 2011-2012 2011-2013 2013-2014 Full Implementation 2014-2015 Paperless by 2018 Test Item Changes Implement Common Core Standards • Common Core Rollouts • 11.01.11 Ann Arbor • 11.08.11 Grand Rapids • 11.14.11 Saginaw Pilot and Field Test

  27. Common Core State StandardsK-12 ELA WEBSITES MDE’s Teaching For Learning http://teachingforlearning.org CCRS Units and Resources http://gomaisa.org NEW

  28. Publication of Common Core State Standards Alignment Documents • The MI State Board of Education adopted the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) as Michigan’s K-12 content standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics in June 2010. Documents detailing the alignment of CCSS with Michigan’s Grade Level Content Expectations (GLCE) and High School Content Expectations (HSCE) in English Language Arts and Mathematics are now available. • http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/Finall_CCSS_Alignment_Docs_358314_7.pdf

  29. New Generation Science Standards • Replace the Science Priority Expectations • 20 Lead States • Michigan is a LEAD State • Achieve is involved • Timeline: 12-18 months

  30. Social Studies Common Standards • Team is forming to develop the standards • 1 year behind Science

  31. Make-Up Dates • Make-up Days: must register • 01.20.11 • 04.25.12 • SB-CEUs: 2.6 completed in MAY

  32. SB-CEUs • All SB-CEU earned after January 1, 2010 will be awarded to educators and administrators via a Secure Central Registry (SCR). After a program ends, SB-CEU Coordinators upload eligible participants into the registry. Once uploaded, participants will receive an email directing them to the web address to complete a personal account in the SCR. • At this time, the requirement for your personal account will be a valid email address. In the near future, a Personal Identification Code (PIC) will also be required. Your PIC comes from your home district’s Human Resources Department. • After completion of the personal account, participants follow the instructions to complete a required evaluation of the offering. After the evaluation is completed, SB-CEUs will be awarded and listed on an unofficial transcript.

  33. One Common Voice – One PlanMichigan Continuous School ImprovementStages and Steps Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

  34. Stage Four: DOStep 10: Monitor Plan DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan FOCUS

  35. So…we’ve written a stellar school improvement plan… Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Overarching Questions • How do we know we’re implementing it? • How do we know the strategy is impacting student achievement?

  36. The School Improvement Team’s role shifts from driving the process to helping determine the degree to which the strategies and activities are making a difference in student achievementand how to strengthen the various school improvement initiatives. Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

  37. Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Summative) DID IT WORK? Implementation: Adult Focused Impact: Student Focused MONITOR EVALUATE MONITOR EVALUATE IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED WITH FIDELITY? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO? DID WE IMPLEMENTTHE PLAN/STRATEGIES CORRECTLY & CONSISTENTLY? DID OUR STRATEGIES RESULT IN INCREASED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? WHAT UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES (GOOD AND BAD) HAVE OCCURRED? DID WE GIVE IT ENOUGH TIME? ENOUGH RESOURCES? MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN (Formative) IS IT WORKING?

  38. Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Summative) DID IT WORK? Implementation: Adult Focused Impact: Student Focused MONITOR EVALUATE MONITOR EVALUATE IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED WITH FIDELITY? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO? MONITORIMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN (Formative) IS IT WORKING?

  39. Activities 39

  40. Just Do IT! Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Adult Focused Student Focused Monitor Implementation Evaluate Implementation Monitor Impact Evaluate Impact

  41. Assessment Planner Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan TAB TWO Handout Created by Dodie Raycraft at St. Joseph ISD and modified by Lisa Asaro for MISD

  42. Progress Monitoring Matrix Every 2 Months SNAPSHOT and Accounting STRATEGY • Administrators will…. • Teachers will… • Students will… • Baseline, Benchmark/Interim/Summative

  43. TAB TEN Pamphlet School Improvement MonitoringTEMPLATE Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan 1 2 3 Pamphlet Created by Lisa Guzzardo Asaro at Macomb ISD and Beth Brophy at Calhoun ISD

  44. TAB TEN Pamphlet Action Steps after Monitoring Template Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan 1 2 3 Pamphlet Created by Lisa Guzzardo Asaro at Macomb ISD and Beth Brophy at Calhoun ISD

  45. Creating a Culture of SI • AUGUST • PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES • ___ Complete School Improvement Plan and submit by September 1st • and post to school website • ___ Complete School Data Profile/Analysis and submit by September 1st • ___ Complete and post to school website Annual Education Report 15 days prior to school starting. • ___ Prepare to share School Improvement Plan at first faculty meeting • ___ Provide an orientation for the School Improvement Team to share roles and responsibility descriptions, decision making process and documentation tool and, and develop key working agreements. • ___ Review Professional Development Plan for alignment to SIP transmitted to MDE Created by Jennifer Sabsook at Char-Am ISD, Scott Felkey at Oakland Schools, Beth Brophy at Calhoun ISD, and Lisa Guzzardo Asaro at Macomb ISD

  46. Stage One: GATHERStep 1: Getting Ready GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile FOCUS

  47. “In God we trust, everyone else brings DATA”

  48. One Common Voice – One PlanStage One Gather:Step 2 Collect School Data Demographic or Contextual Data Describes our students, staff, building, and community Achievement Student Outcome Data How our students perform on local, state and federal assessments (subgroups) Process Data The policies, procedures, and systems we have in place that define how we do business Perception Data Opinions of staff, parents, community and students regarding our school TAB TWO Definitions • What do you already know? • What data do you need to know? • What additional information/data do you need to know? • Where can the information/data be found?

  49. What types of data are/are not readily available in your building? TAB TWO 49

  50. 2011-2012 Approved Cut Scores GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile Stage One: Gather Step 2: Collecting School Data Presenter Dr. Harvey Czerwinski • New Cut Scores – http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/NEW_CUT_SCORES_365039_7.pdf • Cut Score FAQ – http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/New_Cut_Scores_FAQ_365040_7.pdf

More Related