1 / 109

FSI Level IV

FSI Level IV. Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard APRIL 2012. Connector Activity. TAB 2. Two Measures of Describing Cognitive Rigor. Implications for schools and classroom levels: Lesson design Instructional delivery Assessment strategies. Handouts.

hu-stevens
Télécharger la présentation

FSI Level IV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FSI Level IV Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard APRIL 2012

  2. Connector Activity TAB 2 Two Measures of Describing Cognitive Rigor • Implications for schools and classroom levels: • Lesson design • Instructional delivery • Assessment strategies Handouts The National Center for the Improvement for Educational Assessment http://www.nciea.org

  3. Today’s Outcomes • Receive updates • Provide formulas and models • Share Matrix 1 templates to guide Strategy Development at the activity level • Provide verbiage for Goals Management • Share screen shots of Goals Management • Network with colleagues on relevant topics • Start 2012-2013 SPP/A • Explore MI School Data Web Portal and Data Director 4.0

  4. Today’s Roadmap TAB 12 • Welcome • Connector Activity • Noteworthy Updates • Goals Management • Set Goals • Set Measurable Objectives • Identify Strategies • Identify Activities • Multi-Tiered Levels of Intervention • Data Director/MISchooldata • School Improvement Plan or SDP/A

  5. Key Working AgreementsA Facilitation Tool • Respect all Points of View • Be Present and Engaged • Honor Time Agreements • Get All Voices in the Room These breathe life into our Core Values

  6. Parking LotA Facilitation Tool • Rest questions that do not benefit the whole group • Place questionsthat do not pertain to content at this time • Place questions that pertain, but participants do not want to ask at this time

  7. NOTEWORTHY • Flexibility Waiver submitted February 2012 to Fed…stay tuned • www.smarterbalanced.org • MDE/AdvancED Reporting • BAA Reports • Professional Learning • AdvancED 2012-2013 Training Dates • School Data Profile/Analysis (SDP/A) Launched • 2012 High School Student and Teacher Surveys • Child Protection Questionnaire 2012 • Streamlined School Improvement Process

  8. Flexibility Waivers • Flexibility Regarding the 2013-2014 Timeline for determining AYP • Flexibility in Implementation of School Improvement Requirements • Flexibility in Implementation of LEA Improvement Requirements • Flexibility for Rural LEAs • Flexibility for School-wide Programs • Flexibility to Support School Improvement • Flexibility for Reward Schools • Flexibility Regarding Highly Qualified Teachers • Flexibility to Transfer Certain Funds • Flexibility to Use School Improvement Grant Funds to Support Priority Schools

  9. www.smarterbalanced.org Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, the MDE anticipates transitioning to online assessments developed by the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC). While there will be a paper version of the SMAC assessments available for the first 3 years, it is important that Michigan schools make significant progress towards technology readiness in order to take advantage of this next-generation assessment system. SBAC is going to begin Technology Readiness Assessment data collection 04.15.12 – 05.15.12. Emails have been sent on 03.04.12 to Superintendents and Technology Directors

  10. TAB 12 Document Due Dates Document One Document I (SDP/A) School Data Profile/Analysis Due Online: 09.01.12 Document Two Document II (SPP/A) School Process Profile/Analysis Due Online: 03.09.12 DONE a.MDE:School Process Rubrics 90 b.MDE:School Process Rubrics 40 c.NCA:Assist Self Assessment (Assist SA) d. NCA:Self Assessment (SA) Document III (Summary Report/Goals Management) Summary Report/School Improvement Plan Due Online: 09.01.12 Document Three

  11. MDE/AdvancED MI Reporting Assist SA is due 4 weeks prior to QAR or March 9, whichever comes FIRST. Assist SA is due 4 weeks prior to QAR or March 9, whichever comes FIRST. Handout

  12. Bureau of Assessment and Accountability Handouts • Fall 2011 MEAP-Access Results • Release 1st week of March • Hard copies should have shipped end of March • MEAP-Access Performance Levels and Scale Scores • MEAP-Access Performance Level Descriptors (PLDs)

  13. Professional LearningFocusing on Instruction Classroom Instruction that Works 3-day Professional Development August 6-8, 2012 8:30 -3:30 pm MISD

  14. Principal Overview of Literacy in Action Hosted by Dr. Elaine Weber and Tesha Thomas Intended for Principals, Asst. Principals, Literacy Coaches, and Curriculum Directors MISD 05.10.12 8:00 – 10:30 am

  15. AdvancED Michigan Workshopsfor 2012-2013 Accreditation http://www.advanc-ed.org/workshops-webinars SCHOOL ACCREDITATION • AdvancED MI Office, Lansing 04.18.12 DISTRICT ACCREDITATION • Wayne RESA 03.01.12 • AdvancED MI Office, Lansing 04.25.12

  16. 2012 High School Student and Teacher Surveys • Administered to all 9th and 12th grade students • 2 week window: 04.25.12 – 05.09.12 • Boxed surveys delivered van mail addressed to building principal by 04.23.12 • Return by 05.14.12 • Return Teacher Survey by 05.31.12 • Parent Survey will be administered electronically to all Macomb County 11/12 9th grade parents • Results share with Superintendents in Sept. 2012

  17. Child Protection Law Questionnaire Nancy Buyle is collection this information to better assist schools in following the Child Protection Law Complete Survey and return by the end of the today.

  18. MDE Streamlines SI Effective 2012-2013 • 3year or 3-5 year plan • New cycle begins the year following the SPR 90/Assist SA • In-between you will complete the Program Evaluation Tool • Year 2 and 3 you will revise/update plan, SDP/A and SPP/A

  19. One Common Voice – One PlanMichigan Continuous School ImprovementStages and Steps (MI-CSI) STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

  20. One Common Voice – One PlanMichigan Continuous School ImprovementStages and Steps Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile I. School Data Profile II. School Process Profile Analyze Data I. School Data Analysis II. School Process Analysis III. Summary Report/Goals Management Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop Action Plan Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan TAB 12 Gather Comprehensive Needs Assessment Study FOCUS School Improvement Plan Plan Do

  21. Vision, Mission, and Belief Statements • If you have a new vision, include it in your 12-13 (use and effective date) SIP • Visions should align with where you are headed in the future • Missions should state the school’s purpose and lead you to your vision

  22. A Comprehensive Needs Assessment III. Summary Report Strengths Challenges I. School Data Profile/Analysis II. School Process Profile/Analysis III. Goals Management

  23. Stage Three: STUDYStep 5: Set Goals STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Set MeasurableObjectives Research Best Practice FOCUS

  24. Website Resources and Tools www.advanc-ed.org/mde

  25. Reporting Documents • www.advanc-ed.org/mde Goals Management Button 25

  26. AdvancED website Screenshot of:

  27. Goals Management TAB 5 Resources Objectives Strategies Activities Goals • Resource Name • Funding Source • Planned/Actual Amount • Activity Name • Activity Description • Activity Type • Planned/Actual Staff • Planned/Actual Timeline • Research Best Practices • Strategy Name • Strategy Statement • Target Areas • Objective Name • Measurable Objective Statement • Goal Source • Content Area • Goal Name • Student Goal Statement • Gap Statement • Cause for Gap • Measures/ • Sources of Data • Criteria for Success • Person Responsible Handout

  28. Goals Management Structure Goal Objective Strategy Activity Resources TAB 5 Handout

  29. Requirements for Goals Goal must meet one of two requirements: • It is associated with a Content Area for which there are challenges noted during your CNA PROCESS. OR 2. It is associated with a Key Characteristicthat is identified as a challenge on your40/90ORQuality Indicatorthat is a challenge on the SA/Assist SA/ES.

  30. Set Goal Schools are required to write a minimum of three goals, including goal for any area for which they do not meet AYP and/or are not performing at the state average on state assessments. Title I schools must address all four content areas as either improvement or maintenance goals. 30

  31. Goal Development HANDOUT Goal Development Guidelines TAB 5 Guidelines • GOAL may contain one or multiple objectives. • OBJECTIVES may contain one or multiple strategies. • STRATEGIES may contain one or multiple activities. • ACTIVITIES may contain one or more multiple fiscal resources.

  32. STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Adding a New Goal

  33. Goal Management Template Focus www.advanc-ed.org/mde

  34. Goal Details:Use Example Template PART One Goal Name: PART Two Content Area: PART Three Person Responsible:

  35. Goal Details: PART Four Student Goal Statement: (All students will…) ONE STATEMENT ONLY

  36. STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Goal Details PART Five Gap Statement: (Difference between current performance and goal) FIRST GAP All Students

  37. Gap Statement mischooldata.org When considering the percent proficient onMEAP, there is a 10% gap between current performance by all students and the (85%) or 100% goal. In addition, there is a 21% difference between students without disabilities and students with disabilities. GAP FIRST Focus SECOND Focus Usemultiple data sources. 37

  38. STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Goal Details PART Six Cause for Gap: (Consider all DATA sources (Use the 5 Whys)

  39. When considering the percent of students proficient, there is a 21% difference between students without disabilities and students with disabilities as measured by the MEAP; additional data analysis identifies numbers and numeration as the primary cause for gap. Gap Statement & Cause for GapTIPS Important! GAP Use multiple data sources Specific Source for CAUSE

  40. Cause for the Gap StatementExamples • Overall, each grade level saw the targeted subgroups perform lower on: • Numbers and numeration strand of MEAP with AA scoring 6pts lower than other ethnicities and SWDs scoring 19pts. lower than non SWDs. • The same pattern exists on our end of unit tests with a gap of between 14 and 48% pts. between subgroups and those student not in a subgroup. • The curriculum is not aligned with instructional practices • Tier III interventions have not been identified for subgroups.

  41. STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Goal Details www.mischooldata.org PART Seven Describemultiple measures/source of data used to identify this gap in student achievement: MEAP, Pre-Reading ACT, and PLAN e.g. NWEA , AIMSweb, Common Assessments, SRI, Dibels, Parent Surveys, EXPLORE, PLAN, ACT, D-ACT, D-EXPLORE, D-PLAN, D-WorkKeys, Student Failure Rates, Attendance Rates, Discipline Referral Rates SCREENING TOOLS: http://www.rti4success.org/screening Tools

  42. STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Goal Details PART Eight What is the criteria for success and what data or multiple measure of assessment will be used to monitor progress and success of this goal?

  43. Criteria for Success Example • On the MEAP Numbers and Numeration, African Americans will increase the % proficient by __%. SWD will increase the % proficient by __ %. • Teachers will meet to use a data driven dialogue protocol with student work samples 8 times/ semester to adjust and inform instruction. • On the end of unit tests in Math, there will be no more than a 10% proficiency difference between African American and other ethnic populations.

  44. Editing FEATURE in Goals Management • Click the "check my response for errors..." below any text box at anytime to check your response for writing errors. When you are finished correcting errors, click the "continue editing my response..." link to continue your work. Errors will be underlined as follows, spelling error, grammar suggestion, or style suggestion. Click the underlined word to see more options.

  45. Goals Management Structure www.advanc-ed.org/mde

  46. Stage Three: STUDYStep 6: Set Measurable Objectives STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice FOCUS

  47. Goals Management Structure Focus www.advanc-ed.org/mde

  48. Goal Management Resources Objectives Strategies Activities Goals • Objective Name • Measurable Objective Statement • Goal Source • Content Area • Goal Name • Student Goal Statement • Gap Statement • Cause for Gap • Measures/ • Sources of Data • Criteria for Success • Person Responsible

  49. Objective Screenshot

  50. Objective Details STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

More Related