1 / 10

Daniela Henzlova GSI-Darmstadt, Germany NSCL-MSU, East Lansing, Michigan

Comparison of the isotopic distributions measured in the fragmentation of 136 Xe and 124 Xe projectiles with the EPAX parameterization. Daniela Henzlova GSI-Darmstadt, Germany NSCL-MSU, East Lansing, Michigan. Overview of the measured cross sections.

helena
Télécharger la présentation

Daniela Henzlova GSI-Darmstadt, Germany NSCL-MSU, East Lansing, Michigan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of the isotopic distributions measured in the fragmentation of 136Xe and 124Xe projectiles with the EPAX parameterization Daniela Henzlova GSI-Darmstadt, Germany NSCL-MSU, East Lansing, Michigan

  2. Overview of the measured cross sections • more than 1100 production cross sections over 4 orders of magnitude • broad nuclear charge range Z=3(5)-56(55) for 136Xe(124Xe) • extensive database for comparison with up-to-date parameterizations • EPAX2 - based on fragmentation reactions of medium to heavy-mass projectiles in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

  3. Isotopic resolution of FRS 124Xe 136Xe N=Z+k, k=4 136Xe + Pb 1A GeV Z=50 Z=54 • final fragments in broad range unambiguously identified

  4. Overview of the isotopic distributions • 136Xe+Pb 1 A GeV • 124Xe+Pb 1 A GeV

  5. Comparison with EPAX – lower Z • 124Xe+Pb 1 A GeV EPAX for 124Xe+Pb • 136Xe+Pb 1 A GeV EPAX for 136Xe+Pb • underestimation of production cross sections of lighter isotopes

  6. Comparison with EPAX – higher Z • 124Xe+Pb 1 A GeV EPAX for 124Xe+Pb • 136Xe+Pb 1 A GeV EPAX for 136Xe+Pb • underestimation of cross sections of isotopes on the less n-rich side of the isotopic distributions in case of 136Xe projectile • slightly worse agreement with data from more n-rich projectile

  7. Comparison with EPAX2 – available data J. Friese et al., Nucl. Phys. A 553 (1993) 753c R. Schneider, PhD thesis, TU München (1996); Zeit. für Phys. A 348 (1994) 241 J. Reinhold et al., Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) 247 this work • scarce experimental data for n-rich Xe isotope available

  8. Comparison with EPAX – mean N-over-Z 136Xe • 136Xe+Pb 1 A GeV • 124Xe+Pb 1 A GeV EPAX for 136Xe+Pb EPAX for 124Xe+Pb 124Xe • higher <N>/Z in the vicinity of the 136Xe projectile • low values of <N>/Z of the residues far from both projectiles

  9. Comparison with EPAX – mass distributions • 136Xe+Pb 1 A GeV EPAX for 136Xe+Pb • 124Xe+Pb 1 A GeV EPAX for 124Xe+Pb • mass yields for both systems considerably underestimated

  10. Summary • strong underestimation of lighter residues production cross sections independently of system isospin • underestimation of less n-rich isotopes for residues in the vicinity of 136Xe projectile • overall 136Xe data worse reproduced • too strong loss of memory on initial N/Z • underestimation of mass yields for both Xe projectiles present data may serve to refine the EPAX formulation

More Related