1 / 23

Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management

Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management. Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc. Phytoremediation. The use of plants to degrade, extract, contain, or immobilize contaminants in soil, sediment, groundwater, or surface water.

helki
Télécharger la présentation

Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.

  2. Phytoremediation The use of plants to degrade, extract, contain, or immobilize contaminants in soil, sediment, groundwater, or surface water. Phytotechnology Technical & Regulatory Guidance Document – Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation

  3. Phytovolatilization Phytotechnologies can be applied either in situ or ex situ and include: Degradation/ Detoxification Phytostabilization, erosion, and leachate control Constructed and Natural Wetlands for Treatment of Surface Water Phytoextraction: Heavy metal and radio nuclide accumulation Rhizodegradation & Rhizofiltration Chemical Phytostabilization Rhizodegradation, & Contaminant Uptake Hydraulic control: Plume containment

  4. Source: ITRC, 2001 Phytostabilization • Stabilization of contaminated soils in place by vegetation, and immobilization (physically or chemically) of contaminants

  5. Phytostabilization • Advantages • Reduction in erosion potential (wind, soil, runoff, leaching) • Low Cost / Less Disruptive • No removal or disposal • Drawbacks • Effects limited to immediate area of the plantings • Long term maintenance / monitoring

  6. Source: ITRC, 2001 Rhizodegradation • The breakdown of contaminants in the soil through the bioactivity that exists in the rhizosphere • Bacteria, Yeasts, Fungi

  7. Rhizodegradation • Advantages • Positive affects on soil microbe populations • Natural or created wetlands • Low Cost • Release to air less likely • Drawbacks • Effects can be limited to the immediate area of the plantings • Time • Long term maintenance / monitoring

  8. Source: ITRC, 2001 Phytodegradation • Uptake of organic contaminants with the subsequent transformation in the plant’s roots, stems, and leaves.

  9. Phytodegradation • Advantages • Contaminants removed from soil • No residuals management • Either metabolized or degraded • Low cost • Drawbacks • Difficult to separate from phytovolatilization • Possible toxic daughter products

  10. Source: ITRC, 2001 Phytovolatilization • Translocation of dissolved contaminants into plant leaves followed by transpiration to the atmosphere.

  11. Phytovolatilization • Advantages • Contaminants removed from soil • Transformed to less toxic products • No residuals management • Drawbacks • Moving problem from one media to another • Possible air monitoring

  12. Source: ITRC, 2001 Phytoextraction • Translocation of soil contaminants to above ground stems and leaves.

  13. Phytoextraction • Advantages • Contaminants removed from soil • Translocation to above ground plant parts allows harvesting • Reduced disposal costs • Drawbacks • Above ground plant residues must be managed • Must properly dispose

  14. Source: ITRC, 2001 Rhizofiltration • Sorption, concentration, and/or precipitation of contaminants from surface waters or groundwater

  15. Rhizofiltration • Advantages • Stream treatment can occur above ground • Not limited by site location • Drawbacks • Applicable to aqueous phase contamination • Requires engineered system (influent) • Requires monitoring • Must be properly disposed

  16. Source: ITRC, 2001 Hydraulic Control • Uptake and consumption of groundwater in order to contain or control the migration of contaminants.

  17. Hydraulic Control • Advantages • Extracted water is respired by plants • No treatment required • Drawbacks • Hydraulic control by plants is seasonal • Limited primarily to rooting zone • Time and space

  18. Site Evaluation and Phytoremediation Design • Conduct typical site assessment • Develop conceptual phytoremediation design • Evaluate Phytoremediation design vs. traditional remedial alternatives • Costs • Bench scale or pilot scale evaluation of selected phytoremediation approach • Field implementation/planting • Monitoring and reporting

  19. Technology Limitations • Root contact with contaminant- Plant roots must be able to extend to the depth of contaminant or contaminant must be moved to the root zone. • Growth rate of plants – Time (months to years) required for plants to reach maturity. • Contaminant concentration – Free product concentrations toxic to plants. • Unfavorable site conditions – Dense clays, salts, pH or dry conditions not conducive to plant growth. • Ecological risks – Plants may present new exposure pathway for humans and other local organisms

  20. Technology Limitations -continued. • Space concerns – Is space or area available for design/implementation? • Waste production - If wastes are produced can they effectively be disposed? • Mechanism of contaminant remediation – will COC be accumulated within plant tissue or volatilized?

  21. Elizabeth City, NC

  22. Argonne East Site

  23. BP Amoco Site – Sugar Creek, MO

More Related