1 / 44

Strategic Project Grants- 2012 Competition

Strategic Project Grants- 2012 Competition. Katie Wallace , Senior Program Officer Energy, Environment and Resources Research Partnerships Programs. Agenda. Strategic Project Grants Program (SPG) Target Areas SFU and SPG What’s New? Application and Timelines Evaluation Process

hera
Télécharger la présentation

Strategic Project Grants- 2012 Competition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strategic Project Grants- 2012 Competition Katie Wallace, Senior Program Officer Energy, Environment and Resources Research Partnerships Programs

  2. Agenda • Strategic Project Grants Program (SPG) • Target Areas • SFU and SPG • What’s New? • Application and Timelines • Evaluation Process • Helpful Tips

  3. NSERC Budget 2010-2011 ($1.080 billion) Administration ($54M- 5%) People ($302.4M- 28%) Innovation ($324M- 30%) Discovery ($399.6M- 37%)

  4. StrategicPartnerships • Strategic Project Grants • Strategic Network Grants • Collaborative Health Research Projects • Automotive Partnership Canada Training in Industry • Industrial Postgraduate Scholarships • Industrial R&D Fellowships • Industrial R&D Internships • Industrial Undergraduate Student-Research Awards RPP Programs Industry-Driven Collaborative R&D • Collaborative R&D Grants • Industrial Research Chairs • Chairs in Design Engineering • Interaction Grants • Engage Grants • Partnership Workshop Grants • Innovation Frontiers College and Community Innovation • Applied R&D Grants • Applied Research Tools & Instrument Grants • College-University Idea to Innovation Grants • Industrial Research Chairs for Colleges • Innovation Enhancement Grants • Technology Access Centres Grants Commercialization • Idea to Innovation Grants

  5. Industry-Driven Collaborative R&D Program(39.2%) Strategic Partnerships Program (39.9%) 2011-2012 RPP Budget ($282.1M)* Commercialization Program (2.5%) College and Community Innovation Program (11.4%) Training in Industry Program (7%) *Does not include Networks of Centres of Excellence

  6. Engage Grants Program • Fosters the development of new partnerships • Short-term R&D projects for a company-specific problem • Up to $25,000 for up to 6 months • Not peer-reviewed • Partner owns IP • Over 1000 awards have been made since launch in 2009. High success rate (>80%). • 4-6 week decision timeframe (NSERC Regional Offices)

  7. 1 to 5 years duration, usually 2 to 3 years • Average grant $150,000 per year, but can vary from $10K/year to > $400K/year • Industry responsible for at least 1/2 costs and must exploit results • Flexible leverage: cash and in-kind • >80% success rate • No fixed application deadlines • ~6 months processing time Collaborative Research and Development Grants (CRD)

  8. Objective To increase research and training in targeted areas that could strongly influence Canada’s economy, society and/or environment within the next 10 years. Strategic Project Grants (SPG)

  9. Focus on specific areas • Funds projects, not programs of research • NSERC will fund direct costs of a 1 to 3 year project (students, PDFs, consumables, equipment) • Provides an opportunity to take research beyond the university and to carry out innovative science and engineering work with potential for commercialization • Provides opportunity to introduce students to potential employers • There must be significant involvement from the partner BUT a cash contribution is not required Strategic Project Grants

  10. Increased participation of companies and/or government organizations in academic research. • New knowledge/technology with strong potential to strengthen Canada’s industrial base, generate wealth, create employment and/or Canadian public policy. • The transfer of this knowledge/technology to Canadian-based organizations that are well positioned to apply the results for economic gain or to government organizations to strengthen public policy. • Highly qualified personnel trained in the target areas. Expected Results

  11. Access to: • Team of researchers with expertise in a desired area to solve a problem • Technology/idea of commercial interest • Research facilities and infrastructure that the industry lacks • Potential access to a source of HQP • Give companies a competitive edge in global markets What’s in it for the Partners?

  12. The project must: • Fall within one of the target areas • Have well-defined objectives, scope and duration (1-3 years) • Have one or more eligible supporting organizations that are actively involved in all stages of the project and in a position to apply the results Requirements

  13. Priority research topics within: • Information and Communications Technologies • Environmental Science and Technologies • Manufacturing • Natural Resources and Energy Four Target Areas

  14. There are 3-8 priority research topics identified within each target area (80% of budget for a given target area). • Projects that fall outside of the research topics but fit the context of the target area are termed “Exceptional Opportunities outside the research topics” (up to 20% of budget). • Research outside the 4 priority target areas will not be considered for funding Focused Research

  15. Private sector • Canadian-based companies or multi-nationals with Canadian operations (R&D or manufacturing) that can apply the research results for economic gain • Public sector • Canadian government organizations that can apply the research results to strengthen policies (the proposal must clearly show how the project relates to their public policy responsibilities) Non-Academic Supporting Organizations

  16. Non-Academic Supporting Organizations • Do not qualify as the only supporting organization: • NGO’s, venture capitalists, government research labs, foreign research institutions, implementation sites, potential customers, hospitals, clinics.

  17. A supporting organization must also: • Have a demonstrated interest in the project (letters of support, in-kind contributions) • Be involved in all stages of the research (help to develop the proposal, interact with researchers and students, provide input to the project) • Validate the results of the research • Provide guidance concerning exploitation of results • NB: NSERC funds cannot flow to the supporting organization in any way (e.g. you cannot purchase equipment or supplies (even at a discount) from them). Supporting Organizations (continued)

  18. 2006 to 2011: 124* applications, 30 awards (24%) • 2011: 20 applications, 2 awards SFU and Strategic Project Grants *does not include supplemental competitions

  19. Competition Statistics *First competition with new target areas

  20. New Competition Deadline • April 1st, 2012 • International Collaborations • France and Taiwan: all target areas • Japan: only Renewable Energy and Energy Use research topics with the Natural Resources and Energy target area (April 15) What’s New for 2012 • Student Stipends • Specific minima and maxima pertaining to stipends paid from grants are no longer in effect • Restriction on providing supplements from grants to award holders has been removed • GovernmentSupportingOrganizations • Letter of support and Form 183A must be signed by the Director General (or equivalent level)

  21. We anticipate 12-15 new awards per target area • A pre-selection process will (likely) be carried out by the selection panel members using the 7 evaluation criteria to retain the strongest proposals (50-60 applications per target area). • Applications will be strictly screened for fit to program and target area and research topic. You must specifically address this in the “Introduction” section of the proposal. • Applications targeting incremental improvements to existing technologies will not be accepted. 2012 (continued)

  22. The Application

  23. Application for a Grant (Form 101) Parts I and II • Personal Data Forms(Form 100) + CVs of collaborators (6 pages max) • Form 183A (partner’s information and contributions) • Letter of support describing partner’s involvement • Reminder that letter of support and accompanying form 183A from government organizations must be signed by the Director General (or equivalent level) The SPG Application

  24. 11 pages total: • Introduction (~1 page*) • Identify target area and research topic from list provided • Why is the research you propose strategic and how does it fit and address the target area and research topic? • Provide a compelling case for consideration if the research falls outside the research topics but within the target area (Exceptional opportunity outside the Research Topics) • For re-submissions, explain how concerns of the selection panel have been addressed selection panel and reviewers do not see cover letters! Research Proposal- Format *suggested lengths

  25. Section 1 (~7 pages): • Objectives • Approach and research methodology • Workplan (note- you can include a Gantt chart in the budget justification section) • Current scientific, technical, and commercial developments in the field with appropriate references • Expected impact on field of proposed research • Roles of team members Research Proposal- Format • Section 2 (~1 page): • Training Plan

  26. Section 3 (~1 page): • Interactions with supporting organizations • Plan for knowledge and technology transfer (Intellectual Property) • Fit between the project objectives and priorities of supporting organization(s) • Capacity to exploit results Research Proposal- Format • Section 4 (~1 page): • Potential benefits to Canada economic, social, environmental • Potential benefits to supporting organizations • Additional pages – references (2 pages max), relationship to other research, budget justification, details of in-kind contributions

  27. Support for and agreement with the proposal • Reasons for being involved in the proposed collaboration • Anticipated benefits from project outcomes • Effort required to exploit results • Benefits to Canadian economy and the relevant timeframe • Anticipated interaction of personnel with the University • Company’s contribution to the project • Company profile (for small companies or start-ups) Letter of Support- Key Points

  28. Collaborations outside NSE: applicants are encouraged to collaborate with experts outside the NSE. Can represent up to 30% of the project costs (show the breakdown). • Project Management expenses are eligible (up to 10% of the total cash contribution from all sources). • Purchase of major equipment items or systems is limited to a maximum of $150,000 total. • Overlap of funds: the onus is on the applicant to provide as much information as to how/why the project differs from those currently funded (relationship to other support). • Provide as much detail as possible in your budget justification. Show all your calculations and how you arrived at totals presented. No page limit for budget justification… • Ensure that the hours you plan to work on the project are realistic. • Funding decisions are announced in October. This should be considered in the activity schedule and workplan. Additional Points to Consider

  29. Concurrent call for joint research projects • AgenceNationale de la Recherche (France) and National Science Council (Taiwan)- ALL TARGET AREAS • Japan Science and Technology Agency (Japan)- Natural Resources and Energy Target Area: Research topics f and g. • Two separate but linked proposals: one submitted to each agency • Canadian applications must meet all Strategic Project Grant requirements • International agency will fund its scientists • NSERC has not reserved funds for applications related to international concurrent calls • Funding is on a competitive basis within regular SPG budget • Up to 3 additional pages are allowed. See Detailed Instructions. • There is no joint review International Collaborations

  30. The Evaluation

  31. April 1- Submission of Applications(NEW!) • April/May- Pre-Selection Process • Preliminary review by target area selection committee • Only the strongest applications will be retained • June-August- External referees • Typically three per application • Technical expertise to aid the Committee • Appendix C: your suggestions • Panel suggestions and NSERC database • August- Selection Committee • Proposals are assigned to three readers • Discussion amongst the whole group • October- Results announced; October 1 start date Evaluation Process- Timeline

  32. Projects are evaluated against seven criteria. • Each criterion is graded from 1 (lowest score) to 4 (highest score). • Each criterion is of equal weight. • Only projects that are strong in all 7 criteria are eligible for funding. • Detailed information for each criterion is available in the instructions. Evaluation Process

  33. If the number of applications is very high, a pre-selection process will be applied. • Proposals are evaluated by the selection Panels using the seven evaluation criteria. • Proposals with weaknesses will be removed from the competition and will not undergo external peer-review. Pre-selection Process

  34. Originality of the research • Quality of the research • Project work plan • Quality of the applicants as researchers • Training potential • Interactions with the supporting organizations • Benefits to Canada and the supporting organizations Selection Criteria

  35. Originality of the Research • The project must promise to generate new knowledge or to apply existing knowledge in an innovative manner. • Quality of the Research • The project must be scientifically sound and technically feasible. It must fall within a specific target area. Selection Criteria (cont’d)

  36. Project Work Plan • The project must have a clear and coherent work plan that demonstrates a high probability of achieving the objectives in the proposed time frame. • Quality of the Applicants as Researchers • The research team must have all the expertise to address the defined objectives competently and to complete the project successfully. Selection Criteria (cont’d)

  37. Training Potential • The project must provide opportunities to train students and other highly qualified personnel with skills relevant to the needs of Canadian organizations. • Interactions with Supporting Organizations • The supporting organizations must have the capacity to apply the results of the research and must be actively involved in all stages of the project. Selection Criteria (cont’d)

  38. Benefits to Canada and Supporting Organizations • The proposal must identify how the work will benefit the supporting organization(s) and must demonstrate that exploitation of the research results will benefit Canada within a 10-year time frame. Selection Criteria (cont’d)

  39. All sections are clear and well described: • Clear summary, proposal easy to read • All roles are well defined (HQP, applicants …) • Benefits to Canada clearly demonstrated • Guidelines followed and requirements addressed • Strong partner(s): • Involvement from the start • Clear expectations (including IP) • Good communication • On-going interaction Signs of a Good Proposal

  40. Start early! Take full advantage of the Research Office and NSERC staff. • Make the application comprehensible to people outside your field and position your project within the current literature/state of the art - Literature review should not be Task 1 of project! • Pay full attention to all aspects of the application, not just the research proposal (i.e. budget justification, in-kind contributions, relationship to other support). • Make sure the partner is going to benefit actively from the research and not just be an end user. They must be fully engaged. • Explain the fit to the target area and research topic clearly. Top Ten Tips

  41. Ensure that all partners and co-applicants are fully involved. • Understand how your proposal will be evaluated (all criteria are equally weighted!). Only the strongest proposals will be successful. • Tailor your Form 100 to the Program you are applying to. • Explain both the applied and basic aspects of the project. • Have a peer review your proposal against the evaluation criteria. Top Ten Tips (continued)

  42. Halfway through the project, all grantees must submit a Progress Report and supporting organizations will be asked for their feedback. • NSERC will pay the final installment of the grant only if satisfactory progress and collaboration with the supporting organizations has been demonstrated. If you are successful- Reporting • Three monthsafter the project end date, all grantees must submit a Final Report on the project’s achievements with respect to its objectives. • Each supporting organization in the project will be asked to evaluate the project.

  43. For questions relating to fit to target area, eligibility of partners or applicants or Program requirements, please send your query to: STRGR@nserc-crsng.gc.ca For questions/support regarding the on-line application process, please contact: Helpdesk: (613) 995-4273 webapp@nserc-crsng.gc.ca Resources

  44. Questions?

More Related