1 / 8

FOCUS ON IMPLEMENTATION NURTURE SUCCESS

Implementation Sessions Biochemical Reactors for Mining-Influenced Water Groundwater Statistics and Monitoring Compliance. FOCUS ON IMPLEMENTATION NURTURE SUCCESS. ITRC Project Life Cycle. Groundwater Statistics Bioreactors. Implementation.

hermanwest
Télécharger la présentation

FOCUS ON IMPLEMENTATION NURTURE SUCCESS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementation SessionsBiochemical Reactors for Mining-Influenced WaterGroundwater Statistics and Monitoring Compliance

  2. FOCUS ON IMPLEMENTATION NURTURE SUCCESS ITRC Project Life Cycle • Groundwater Statistics • Bioreactors

  3. Implementation • Getting ITRC guidance into the hands of target users to improve decision making • Documenting the results of their use to showcase ITRC success

  4. What is ITRC Success? • ITRC’s Expected Results

  5. 2 Key Success Types for ITRC are: • Use of the document for site activities/decision making • Incorporating/referencing ITRC document in state (or other agency) guidance

  6. Success Snippets Minnesota:Concepts from LNAPL Training used to support risk management decision; resulted in saving approximately $500,000 in overall cleanup dollars. Louisiana:Decreasing approval time. At Army FUDS, ITRC ISM guidance used to develop site work plan. Time was saved as document provided good information to answer reviewers’ questions/comments. California:Estimated resource savings of at least a 50% time savings compared to developing their guidance without the ITRC ISM information. “If we [CA] had to develop a separate ISM guidance document or include an ISM approach, it would have taken at least 50% more time to develop the NOA guidance.” Colorado:Estimate a 90% savings in resources because the ITRC ISM document was available with credible information to support the inclusion of ISM information into Colorado’s draft Owner/Operator Guidance.

  7. Implementation Session Goals • Preview our new ITRC guidance documents, how, when and why they should be used [led by Team Leader(s)] • Demonstrate use of documents [led by Team Leader(s)] • Gather your ideas about who could benefit from using these documents (specific people, sites, states) [small group discussions]

  8. Today’s Implementation Sessions: • 1st Session (1 hour): Biochemical Reactors for Mining-Influenced Water • led by Cherri Baysinger (MO), David Cates (OK), and Steve Hill (Program Advisor) • 2nd Session (1 hour): Groundwater Statistics and Monitoring Compliance • led by Ning-Wu Chang (CA) and Lesley Hay Wilson (Program Advisor)

More Related