1 / 31

Presenting a Unified Interface to Patrons from Disparate Systems

Presenting a Unified Interface to Patrons from Disparate Systems. Barbara Coopey Penn State University SNRG 2008. Background: Penn State. 22 Campuses located throughout the state, plus World Campus (excluding Penn College and Penn State College of Medicine – Hershey)

hetal
Télécharger la présentation

Presenting a Unified Interface to Patrons from Disparate Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presenting a Unified Interface to Patrons from Disparate Systems Barbara Coopey Penn State University SNRG 2008

  2. Background: Penn State • 22 Campuses located throughout the state, plus World Campus (excluding Penn College and Penn State College of Medicine – Hershey) • University Park – largest with half student population • University Park has Pattee and Paterno Libraries complex plus 5 branch libraries • 27 pickup locations (excluding World) • Libraries offers same service to patron regardless of campus location • 2 resource sharing platforms – Unicorn and ILLiad

  3. Challenge • Separate systems for circulation, interlibrary loan, consortial borrrowing • Each system’s management is located in different library units • Varying policies and practices developed over time in separate units and systems • Patron confusion and frustration

  4. Resource Sharing - Books • CAT – “I Want It” • Request books from other library locations: campus, branch, remote storage • EZBorrow – Palci Consortium • Request books from 68 PA, NJ, WV libraries • ILLiad –resource sharing request management software developed by Atlas Systems, Inc. • Interlibrary loan books and articles • Intra-campus and remote storage requesting for articles, non-circulating material • Articles from local campus (faculty, staff)

  5. Resource Sharing - Books • E-ZBorrow system integrates with Sirsi Unicorn • When PSU patron requests a book via E-ZBorrow and book arrives: • Staff ‘receive’ the book in E-Zborrow and assign it a PSU barcode number • Workflows automatically creates a brief title record for the item and places a hold on it for the patron • Staff place barcode and patron’s name on bookband

  6. Resource Sharing - Books • Staff discharge book using the barcode on bookband creating an ‘available hold’ • Patron receives Unicorn generated email that says book is available for pickup • When patron picks up book, it is listed on his/her “My Library Account” just as books from Penn State Libraries

  7. Resource Sharing - Books • ILLiad is a separate system and does not integrate with Unicorn • Patrons create profile / pickup location • Request books directly on ILLiad • Use the ILL link from WorldCat (popular choice) where the book information is populated onto ILLiad request form • Books checked out are on patron’s ILLiad account • Patron needs to look in both ILLiad and CAT to see which books he/she has checked out

  8. Resource Sharing – Books • Even though a patron requests a book on ILLiad, ILL staff may decide to request that book via E-ZBorrow or from another Penn State location • Why? longer loan period; patrons can renew PALCI books for 4 weeks; faster to receive; we want to increase our E-ZBorrow borrowing activity

  9. Pickup locations • Patrons pickup books from “I Want It”, E-ZBorrow, ILLiad at their local circulation desk • Different colored bookbands identify E-Zborrow and ILLiad books • Pickup shelves sorted by patron’s name – all books together for patron

  10. Different Systems/Different Library Units • From beginning E-ZBorrow processing was placed in Lending Services Unit of Access Services • ILLiad and Access PA processing done in Interlibrary Loan Unit of Access Services • Campus and branch libraries process Unicorn and E-Zborrow books and hand out ILLiad books • New responsibility 2005 – oversee all resource sharing activity – opportunity to examine processes in the two platforms

  11. Different Systems/Different Library Units • One library may supply a book via interlibrary loan and also a book via E-Zborrow • Mixed messages to patron: • Lost E-Zborrow book- patron would get a bill on Unicorn for (est. price of book + proc. fee) • Lost ILL book-patron would get a bill from Bus. Office for $100 + proc fee – both books from same library • Timing of notices, overdues, bills were different depending upon which system supplied • Even more confusing when ILL staff ordered via E-Zborrow for the patron

  12. Unified Interface • Even though the patron is presented with several requesting options, the goal is to simplify patron’s experience – seamless, consistent • Examined systems for consistent language, notices, overdue procedures, bills, policies • Created Working Group to develop consistent billing procedures, policies and charges across the units and platforms

  13. General Consistency • Language: the pickup locations in E-ZBorrow and ILLiad are worded similar to what the patron chooses on the Libraries’ CAT for books • System generated emails similar and direct patron to their chosen pickup location • Policies – who is eligible to borrow • Link to other system

  14. Working Group working document

  15. Working Group working document

  16. Working Group Changes • No matter what system, patron’s notifications would be similar and follow similar time frame • Consitent number of overdue notices, wording in the overdue notices, “intent to bill” notice; lost processing fee • Developed policies for billing patron, what to do if patron wants to replace book, refunds

  17. Working Group Changes • Place bills on Workflows for overdue ILL books • Charge $100 plus $25 for lost E-Zborrow, ILLiad, Access PA books • Add Brief Title in Workflows with request # • Check item out to patron • Mark item lost and add amount • Block patron on ILLiad • Fee added on WF automatically blocks patron on Sirsi Unicorn

  18. Working Group Changes • All fees for any overdue, lost books would now be on the patron’s “My Library Account” • Billing would follow practices in place for Penn State books • Students – bill not paid moves to Bursar account • Faculty/Staff – bill not paid moves to wage garnishment • Student - bill not paid and he/she graduates (become PA residents) goes to collection agency

  19. Working Group Changes • Created training document of how to add bill to WF; how to credit patron’s account for lost ILL material • From the Group’s working document we created a policies document • Discussed different scenarios and developed consistent methods to handle issues

  20. Billing Policies - Borrowing

  21. Billing Policies - Borrowing

  22. Lending • Working Group also examined consistent practices for lending Penn State books • Overdue notices, billing timing and procedure, replacement copies • Charge $100 replacement fee (no processing fee) • Discussed what to do if system says “returned” and we did not received book; if “shipped” and borrowing library never received

  23. Working document - Lending

  24. Billing Policies - Lending

  25. Billing Policies - Lending

  26. Conclusion • Created a more consistent, unified experience for our patrons • All bills on Unicorn, email notices similar wording and more regular timing for billing/blocking • Better response from patrons on returning books (“intent to bill” email with $100 + $25 at 30 days past due date)

  27. Conclusion • Overdue/Billing process streamlined/less staff time involved • Reduction in number of unreturned books and bills • Uniform practices for staff in the different units to handle refunds, replacement copies, “claims returned”

  28. Thanks. Questions? Barbara Coopeybmc4@psu.edu

More Related