1 / 18

Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD)

Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD). Interim Program Report 30 Sept – 30 Dec 2013 Karen Guttieri, Principal Investigator. Motivation. Civil Affairs are…

hila
Télécharger la présentation

Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD) Interim Program Report 30 Sept – 30 Dec 2013 Karen Guttieri, Principal Investigator

  2. Motivation • Civil Affairs are… • “the vanguard of DoD’s support to U.S. government efforts to assist partner governments in the fields of rule of law, economic stability, governance, public health and welfare, infrastructure, and public education and information” (US Quadrennial Defense Review Report2010 ) • highly-valued in US foreign and defense policy • under-valued as strategic assets in planning/operations • divided and neglected (Lamont memo) • “Functional specialties” are… • flawed – the system of classifying and managing needs reworking (RAND) • to be reformed as new Military Occupational Specialty – 38G

  3. Governance Innovation for Security and Development (GISD) is… …a research project that seeks solutions to the challenges of supporting governance in fragile environments. GISD aims to develop a framework to promote peace and well-being through good governance—provision of essential services, political moderation and accountability, stewardship of state resources, and civic participation and empowerment.  GISD researchers address current issues and trends in stability sectors—social well-being, promotion of safe and secure environments, stable governance, rule of law, sustainable economies and infrastructure, and homeland integration—and the competencies needed when the military is called upon to support to civilians in those sectors.  

  4. Statement of Work: Research Establish cross-disciplinary team and outreach Produce reviews of military governance, stability sectors, and homeland integration SupportIMSG professionalization of Civil Affairs / 38G classifications Identify educational needs Considercontext, behavior, info and technological enablers of peace and stability operations Final Report due 20 Aug 2014 GISD - Project Concept FOCUS

  5. Primary Sponsor Point of contact: IMSG • The Institute for Military Support to Governance (IMSG) manages the provision of civil sector expertise across the range of military operations in order to support USG obligations under international law and promote stability.  On order, supports Theater Security Cooperation, Transitional Military Authority, and Support to Civil Administration operations. • BG Hugh Van Roosen, Director

  6. GISD Sector Leads / Key Colleagues 38G Marc Ventresca Tony Vacha Tech/Behavior Curt Blais Margarita Quihuis Mark Nelson Homeland Integration Melanne Civic Margalynne Armstrong OTJAG Jon Czarnecki NWC Team- USMA Paula Philbin Marc Ventresca Maria Pineda Peter Walker Tufts Maria Pineda Marc Ventresca UCLA/Notre Dame Karen Guttieri Charles Palmares Herman Semes Stanford Program Karen Guttieri, PI Curt Blais Charles Palmares

  7. Collaborative Sites Established • Internal team website: GISD Google site* • Team calendar • Project updates • To-do list • Reference documents – doctrine, etc. • Collaborative documents – meeting notes, etc. • Public info website: GISD site • PublicGISD Research Site NPS Library • GISD Refworks Site - bibliographies • New -- GISD Community in All Partners Access Network (APAN) * Google sites are private (controlled access list).

  8. GISD Meetings 1: Convened • Weekly Team Meetings • Design Meeting 17-18 Oct 2013 Video Teleconference- 351 CACOM/Fort Bragg, Stanford • Added review of military governance per se; • Initiated lit review protocol • Consensus on stability sectors • Analysis of Civil Affairs mission • Interim Program Review 5-6 Nov 2013* Fort Bragg, NC • Human behavior / field lab / Initiated 38G classifications • New occupational specialty 38G problem analysis • Persuasive Tech and Field Lab Network concepts • Interim Program Review 16-19 Dec 2013* Naval Postgraduate School and Stanford University • Social well-being, Rule of law, Governance panels/presentations *additional beyond statement of work

  9. GISD Meetings 2: Sector Reviews • Sector Reviews • 14-15 January 2014:  Rule of Law (DC) • 27-28 March 2014: Social Well-Being / Economy (DC) • Upcoming sector reviews: • 12-13 May 2014: Safe and Secure Environment IPR (PKSOI) • 17-19 June 2014: Governance (NPS or TBD) • 24-26 June 2014: Homeland Integration (DC)​ • 22-24 July 2014: Project Wrap-Up (NPS)

  10. GISD Meetings 3: PSOTEW • DoD+ Conference* • 24-28 March 2014: (GMU) • GSID research team will host two full days of panels • One of three official Working Groups (WG) • Based on a proposal submitted by the PI • Reaching wide community of scholars and practitioners *additional beyond statement of work

  11. GISD Outreach - Sample • Atlantic Council • Caerus Assoc. • Civ-Mil Working Group* • Centre for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces (DCAF) • Geneva Centre for Security Policy • George Mason University • Institute for State Effectiveness • JAG School • National Defense University • NATO • Naval War College • Notre Dame • PKSOI • PSOTEW Stakeholders* *umbrella organizations • Stanford University • Center for Deliberative Democracy • Center for Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law • Law School • Peace Innovation Lab • State Partnership Program • TJAG • Tufts University • UCLA • UNDPKO • University of Geneva • US Military Academy • USAID • US Dept of State CSO • USARC • World Economic Forum

  12. Requirements across: Theater Security Cooperation Support to Civil Authority Transitional Military Authority 38A and 38G: Not clear 38A capable of organizing 38G 38A tactically focused Categorization: Too broad categories will not discriminate Too narrow categories will leave empty cells 38G Concept: Preliminary Analysis

  13. Comments / Questions? Karen Guttieri Global Public Policy Academic Group Naval Postgraduate School Guttieri@nps.edu 831-869-5275

  14. CA Mission MISSION 1-1. The mission of CA forces is to is to mitigate or defeat threats to civil society and conduct responsibilities normally performed by civil governments across the range of military operations by engaging and influencing the civil populace and authorities through the planning and conducting of CAO, or to enable CMO, to shape the civil environment and set the conditions for military operations. CA forces plan, prepare for, execute, assess, and transition CAO at all levels of war. Joint Publication (JP) 3-57, Civil-Military Operations, states Civil Affairs forces are designated Active and Reserve Component forces and units organized, trained, and equipped specifically to conduct civil affairs operations and to support civil-military operations. As defined, CA refers to the force structure—Soldiers, teams, staff personnel, and units. CA forces conduct CAO supported by other forces. CAO support the JFC’s CMO intent and are synchronized with the supported commander’s operational concept. 1-2. CA forces support unified land operations in every environment across the range of military operations. During unified land operations, CA forces conduct CAO that support and are nested within the overall mission and commander’s intent. CAO are a cornerstone to the successful execution of stability tasks. FM 3-57 Change 1, 30 September 2013

  15. CIVIL AFFAIRS MISSION VERBS CIVIL ENGAGEMENT: COGNITIVESCALE Inform C1 Facilitate C2 Coordinate C3 Collaborate C4 Mitigate C5 Influence C6 De-conflict C5 Resolve C5 Develop C6 CIVIL ENGAGEMENT: PHYSICALSCALE Distribute P1 Deliver P2 Contract P2 Supervise P3 Construct P3 Conduct P4 Sustain P4 CIVIL RECONNAISANCE: COGNITIVESCALE Process C3 Analyze C4 Review C5 Assess C6 Identify C1 Verify C2 Refute C3 CIVIL RECONNAISANCE: PHYSICALSCALE Observe P1 Inspect P2 Monitor P3 Detect P4 Verbs in Red do not exist in TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-1

  16. TEMPLATING - METT-TC MISSION METT-TC METT-TC POPULATION AREA Terrain & Weather Civil Considerations Enemy (Threat) • Urban, Desert, • Jungle, Mountain • Season / Temp • Size • Ethnicities • Religions METT-TC METT-TC RESOURCES HN CAPACITY Troops,Time,Support Civil Considerations Civil Vulnerability METT-TC METT-TC METT-TC

  17. MILITARY GOVERNMENT MISSION VERBS SCA & TMA: COGNITIVESCALE Estimate C2 Implement C3 Manage C4 Influence C6 Integrate C5 Develop C6 Mitigate C5 TMA ONLY SCA & TMA: PHYSICALSCALE Train P1 Advise P3 Educate P2 Assist P4 Direct P4 Conduct P5 Govern P6 Verbs in Red do not exist in TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-1

More Related