Parsimonious Forecasting
220 likes | 433 Vues
Parsimonious Forecasting. Intercontinental Hotel Group IHG. Julia Lassarat February 3, 2014. Overview. Industry and Firm Introduction Overview of Forecasting Disaggregating RNEA Forecasting Sales, EPAT, and NEA. Industry Overview.
Parsimonious Forecasting
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Parsimonious Forecasting Intercontinental Hotel Group IHG Julia Lassarat February 3, 2014
Overview • Industry and Firm Introduction • Overview of Forecasting • Disaggregating RNEA • Forecasting Sales, EPAT, and NEA
Industry Overview • Resilient industry in the face of slowing economic pace • Revenue per available room (RevPAR) is standard performance metric • RevPAR was up 4.5% in 2012 in comparison to 5.9% in 2011 • Highly competitive market • The global hotel market is estimated to be 21.5 million rooms • 7.5 million of these are branded hotel rooms Source: IHG 2012 Annual Report
Top Ten Hospitality Trends Expected in 2014 • Millennial customer base • Increased need for speed/ precision • “WOW” customer service • Increased leadership involvement • More international/leisure visitors • Social Media/Mobile Phone symbiosis • Content marketing will replace traditional ads • Renewed focus on property websites • Increased attention to review sites • Reputation Management Source: Hotelnet.com
Intercontinental Hotel Group (IHG) • SWOT Analysis • Company Life Cycle
SWOT Analysis Internal Factors External Factors Positive Factors Negative Factors
Life Cycle Stage: Mature Operating Investing Financing
Overview of Forecasting • Optimistic v. Conservative • Make a bad decision or miss a valuable opportunity? • Forecasts of Revenue, EPAT, and NEA are linked in the same way as historical Revenue, EPAT, and NEA • Heavily rely on firm/industry-specific assumptions
Disaggregate Return on NEA (RNEA) • RNEA= EPAT/avg(NEA) • IHG has surprisingly high RNEA • Average EPAT, but low NEA
Disaggregating Return on NEA (RNEA) • RNEA=EPAT/avg(NEA) =EPAT * Sales Sales avg (NEA) RNEA= EPM*EATO
Enterprise Profit Margin • How much operating profit the firm earns from each dollar • The higher, the better • Affected by • Product prices • Manufacturing costs • Wages • Industry competition
IHG’s Annual EPM • Enterprise operations’ profitability are fairly stable • EPAT only includes EPAT from sales
Enterprise Asset Turnover • Measures productivity of firm’s enterprise assets; how much in sales is generated per dollar of investment • Most easily increased by reducing working capital • Reducing capital assets is more difficult
IHG’s Annual EATO • Relatively stable over three years • Exceeds 1.40 median of publicly traded firms
Tradeoff Between EPM and EATO • Capital Structure has an opposite effect on EPM and EATO • Capital intensive firms often have low EATO but require a higher EPM • One cannot compare only a firm’s EATO or only a firm’s EPM to comparable companies
Forecasting Using Sales Growth, EPM, and EATO • Forecast revenues via forecasts of sales growth rates • Forecast EPAT via forecasts of EPM • Forecast NEA via forecasts of EATO
Forecasting Revenues • 5.50% Assumption
Forecasting EPM • 28% Assumption
Forecasting EATO • 1.67 Assumption
Parsimonious Assumptions • Sales Growth Rate: 5.50% • EPM: 28% • EATO: 1.67