1 / 19

Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster ( Crassostrea virginica ) health and abundance

Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster ( Crassostrea virginica ) health and abundance. Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727-896-8626 melanie.parker@myfwc.com. Water Flow in Florida.

hollee-wiley
Télécharger la présentation

Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster ( Crassostrea virginica ) health and abundance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica) health and abundance Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727-896-8626 melanie.parker@myfwc.com

  2. Water Flow in Florida U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District

  3. Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) • CERP implemented as a means of reinitiating natural freshwater flow to both coasts of south Florida • Monitoring component of CERP addresses impacts of changed FW flow on the flora and fauna • Eastern oyster chosen as a target species for CERP

  4. Study Sites • IMPACTED SITES St. Lucie Estuary Loxahatchee River Lake Worth Lagoon Biscayne Bay • CONTROL SITES Tampa Bay Mosquito Lagoon Sebastian River

  5. Pristine environment Located within Canaveral National Seashore Few anthropogenic or freshwater inputs Mosquito Lagoon

  6. Mosquito Lagoon Stations 2 3 1

  7. Urban environment Increasing levels of development, industry and agriculture Flood control canals and drainage ditches St. Lucie Estuary

  8. Exposed to altered patterns of water quantity and quality excess wet season flows insufficient dry season flows extreme salinity fluctuations High sediment and pollutant inputs St. Lucie Estuary

  9. St. Lucie Stations 1 1 2 North Central 3 2 3 1 South 2 3

  10. Salinity Patterns

  11. Juvenile Recruitment • Monthly sampling • 3 replicate spat arrays at each station • Count live oysters on underside of each strung shell

  12. Juvenile Recruitment

  13. Abundance and Distribution • Twice per year • 10 replicate 1-m2 quadrats at each station • Count total live and dead oysters • Measure SH of 50 live oysters

  14. Abundance and Distribution

  15. Perkinsus marinus (Dermo) • Monthly sampling • Collect and dissect 15 oysters from each site • Process gill and mantle tissues with RFTM • Parasite density ranked with Mackin scale

  16. Perkinsus marinus (Dermo)

  17. Summary

  18. Conclusions • The prevalence and intensity of dermo infection is greater at the high salinity Mosquito Lagoon site than at the more variable salinity St. Lucie site • Nevertheless, oysters in Mosquito Lagoon exhibit higher recruitment rates and less variable adult populations relative to the St. Lucie estuary • The indirect (negative) effects of salinity appear to exceed the direct effects of dermo on oyster health and abundance in east coast Florida waters • In FLORIDA SOUTHEAST COAST ESTUARIES, it may be premature to conduct oyster reef rebuilding operations until freshwater entering those estuaries is properly managed

  19. Questions?

More Related