1 / 42

Ohio Balanced Growth Program

Ohio Balanced Growth Program. Progress and New Projects Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University Sandra Kosek -Sills, Ohio Lake Erie Commission. Balanced Growth in Ohio. Linking Land Use and Water Resources Planning Framework Document Projects Planning Process

holli
Télécharger la présentation

Ohio Balanced Growth Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ohio Balanced Growth Program Progress and New Projects Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University Sandra Kosek-Sills, Ohio Lake Erie Commission

  2. Balanced Growth in Ohio • Linking Land Use and Water Resources • Planning Framework • Document • Projects • Planning Process • Best Local Land Use Practices - Recommendations for local government - Case Studies - Statewide Program

  3. Land Use & Lake Erie • Lake Erie Protection & Restoration Plan – 2000 • Outlined serious land use problems that diminish the health of the lake, and limit its benefits to the people of Ohio • Balanced Growth Blue Ribbon Task Force • 2002-2004

  4. Linking Land Use and Lake Erie Best Local Land Use Practices A Planning Framework

  5. Balanced Growth Watershed Planning • voluntary • locally led • incentive-based • support through alignment of state policies and programs

  6. Watershed Planning Partnerships • Piloted in 2006 for 3 years with OWDA $ • Pilot Watersheds • Chagrin River (Chagrin River Watershed Partners) • Chippewa Creek (Cuyahoga River Community Planning Organization) • Swan Creek (Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments) • Upper West Branch of Rocky River (Medina SWCD) • It was a test: Will it work? • All four of the initial projects received full state endorsement by 9/09: Yes, it can work.

  7. State of Ohio Partners Ohio Lake Erie Commission Ohio Water Resources Council Office of the Governor Public Works Commission Public Utilities Commission Ohio Water Development Authority Dept of Agriculture Dept of Development Dept of Health Dept of Natural Resources Dept of Transportation Environmental Protection Agency

  8. Not pictured: Big Creek (Cuyahoga)

  9. Priority Conservation Area • Locally designated areas targeted for protection and restoration • Critically important ecological, recreational, heritage, agricultural, and public access areas

  10. Priority Development Area • Locally designated areas targeted for development or redevelopment • Maximize development potential and efficient use of infrastructure • Promote revitalization of existing urban areas

  11. Priority Agricultural Area • Locally designated areas targeted for agriculture • Protect critical farmland and efficiently use infrastructure • Optional designation based on local desire

  12. Review and Endorsement • “significant” local support prior to endorsement: 75% of… • population • land area • number of communities

  13. Balanced Growth Strategy • State activity to update and improve Balanced Growth Program • Action Items adopted at June 23, 2010 Lake Erie Commission meeting • Draft Balanced Growth Strategy is also available • Highest priority action: updating and enhancing the special incentives available to participating communities with state endorsed Watershed Balanced Growth Plans

  14. Linking Land Use and Lake Erie Best Local Land Use Practices A Planning Framework

  15. Location of development for minimum impact Management and control of storm water and erosion Protection of stream and wetland areas so they can do their job as storm water infrastructure Protection of scenic, historic and natural resources to help retain our “great place” Local Governments Can Have a Big Impact on Watershed and Community Quality

  16. Top Priority Best Local Land Use Practices 1. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING Have a comprehensive plan that meets minimum standards; update it every 3 to 5 years

  17. 2. COMPACT DEVELOPMENT Apply Compact Development where appropriate Top Priority Best Local Land Use Practices

  18. Compact Development • Residential, commercial or mixed use • Strong neighborhood design • Pedestrian walkability • Range of housing choices • Range of transportation choices

  19. Top Priority Best Local Land Use Practices 3. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT • Adopt storm water management and erosion control regulations for design and construction

  20. 4. STREAM AND WETLAND SETBACKS Adopt stream and wetland setback zoning regulations Top Priority Best Local Land Use Practices

  21. Stream And Wetland Setbacks • Zoning setback similar to front and side yards • Improves storm drainage infrastructure function of creeks and waterways • Width determined by drainage area of the sub watershed, or wetland category • Typical setback provisions apply (variances, grandfathering, enforcement)

  22. 5.CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT Apply Conservation Development, with adequate standards, where appropriate Top Priority Best Local Land Use Practices

  23. Conventional Conservation Development • 40-50% Permanent Open Space • Quality Open Space • Resource Protection • Appropriate Development Intensity

  24. Stream setback in a conservation development

  25. MEADOW PROTECTION (NATURAL AREAS ESTABLISHMENT) Allow natural meadows, succession under controlled conditions Top Priority Best Local Land Use Practices

  26. Best Local Land Use Practices 11 Guidance Documents Comprehensive Planning Conservation Development Compact Development Transfer of Development Rights Steep Slope Protection Historic Preservation Source Water Protection Woodland Protection Access Management Brownfields Redevelopment Scenic Protection Agricultural Protection

  27. Decision Making Process for Site Planning in the Lake Erie Basin Guiding Principles: • Design to established project objectives • Integrate existing water and terrestrial resources into site design • Fix “dysfunctional” streams • Focus on controlling the flow – pollution control will follow • “Start at the Source” to manage runoff • Control all runoff per site conditions: infiltrate & evapotranspirate & detain • Use “Triple bottom line” approach to identify multi-objective benefits: community & environment & financial

  28. Detention Detention Detention

  29. Statewide BLLUP Program 2010+ Year • State Agency Steering Committee – project oversight • Statewide Advisory Group – broad review of BLLUP documents • Ohio Regions Strategies – identify local providers and needed support for their missions • Message and Materials Development – statewide relevance • Network Development – statewide network of providers and others to provide support, education, training, materials, message • Ongoing case study and workshop development

  30. Further Discussion: Urban and Redevelopment Areas • Priorities for redevelopment: storm water, compact development, conservation development, stream setbacks • Foreclosure/vacant properties • Urban Agriculture • Urban industrial riverfront redevelopment • Suggested case studies • Priorities going forward

  31. Further Discussion: Exurban Areas • Vacant/Foreclosed properties? • Abandoned development projects? • Infill opportunities • Suggested case studies • Support for promoting Best Local Land Use Practices? • Top priorities going forward

  32. Next Steps: • Detailed Review of BLLUP Sections • Ohio Regions interviews • Message Development

  33. Best Local Land Use Practices – Resources Available • Web site www.balancedgrowth.ohio.gov • Best Local Land Use Practices document – issues, guidance, recommendations • Model and Example regulations • Education and technical workshops • Case studies • DVD for elected officials and business interests • Ongoing technical assistance

  34. Ed Hammett Executive Director Sandra Kosek-Sills Environmental Specialist lakeeriecommission@ameritech.net 419.245.2514 Gail Hesse Administrator Gail.Hesse@epa.state.oh.us 614.644.2146 Kirby Date, AICP Best Local Land Use Practices Program Manager 216.687.5477 k.date@csuohio.edu

More Related