1 / 30

Child Support Re-engineering

Child Support Re-engineering. The Idaho Child Support Enhanced Case Management System. 2004>>>>>>>>2006. State of Idaho. State of Idaho. State of Idaho One, Single, Statewide Business. Seven Regional Child Support Offices. Standard process for case closure –

hollie
Télécharger la présentation

Child Support Re-engineering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Child Support Re-engineering The Idaho Child Support Enhanced Case Management System

  2. 2004>>>>>>>>2006 State of Idaho State of Idaho State of Idaho One, Single, Statewide Business Seven Regional Child Support Offices

  3. Standard process for case closure – Customer Service & Data Integrity Resources dedicated to locate services – Customer Service & Collections Closure Unit Locate Unit Region 1 Core Case Management standards for Collections, Customer Service & Data Integrity Customer contact when establishing cases – Customer Service Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 INIT Units P/E Units ORDS Unit Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Interstate Units Other States “Flow-through” Functions – Collections & Data integrity LSCU SECU FIDM CALL CNTR Enforcement Support Units – Collections, Customer Service & Data Integrity FARU PARU RMCU SACU Idaho’s Enhanced Case Management System

  4. What is re-engineering? • It’s about Change (The Culture) • It’s about Structure (The Organization) • It’s about Tasks (The Work) • It’s about People (The Workers) • It’s about Technology (Automated Systems) • It’s about Performance (Quality, Accuracy, Timeliness, Consistency, and Standardization) Re-engineering is about redesigning and implementing an interconnected statewide business system

  5. Why Change? • To Align People, Resources, and Technology • To Manage Caseload Growth • To Work Within Budget Constraints • To Compensate for Staffing Reductions • To Meet Challenges with Hiring, Training, Achieving Productivity • To Reduce Inefficiencies • To Achieve Performance Expectations • To Improve Customer Service

  6. The Need for Change • From 1999 – 2006, Idaho’s Child Support caseload has increased each year without a proportionate increase in FTE. • Less time available per case • Less time available per customer • Requires proactive management to: • Discover and implement efficiencies • Maintain high quality outputs and excellent customer service • Effectively implement and manage change

  7. Changing the Culture Who & What Needs to Change? • Management • Supervisors • Line Staff • Processes Bye Bye, Case Ownership, Hello, Shared Accountability

  8. Child Support Caseload to FTE Growth Source: Caseload Growth – FFY yearly average received from monthly DISA download; FTE- OCSE 157 Report

  9. Structure – Organizational Change • Management Team of 11 reduced to 5 • 7 Regional Offices Structure Redefined • 1 Statewide Core Case Management Unit • 13 In-House Functional Consolidated Units • 2 Outsourced Functional Consolidated Units Seven “States” of Idaho have become One, Single Statewide Business

  10. One, Single, Statewide Business

  11. Organizational Structure

  12. Staffing a Statewide Operation This Statewide system is managed by a Management Team of 5 Program Managers (3 Hub Based, 2 Located in the central Business Office). The Statewide Team - 148 Front Line Supervisors & Staff: • 13 Functional Consolidated Units with a total of 74 FTP • A Statewide Core Case Management Team with a total of 57.5 FTP • A Supervisory Team of 16.5 FTP With Additional Case Management Support From: • 2 Consolidated Support Units under a Contract Operation – Customer Service (CSCS), Receipting (SDU) • A Program Support Team located in the central Business Office

  13. Child Support Statewide Consolidated Units • INIT – Case Initiation – Two Units – Coeur d’Alene & Boise (Westgate) • PECU – Paternity Establishment – Two Units – Coeur d’Alene & Boise (Westgate) • LOCU – Locate - Lewiston • ISCU – Interstate – Two Units – Caldwell & Lewiston • FIDM – Financial Institutions Data Match – Boise (Westgate) • FARU – Financial Audit Review – Boise (Westgate) • PARU – Payment Adjustment & Recovery – Twin Falls • ORDS – Order Abstract & Debt Setup - Pocatello • LSCU – License Suspension - Pocatello • SACU – Secondary Approval Unit (Adjustments) – Idaho Falls • CLOS – Case Closure – Idaho Falls • SECU – Special Enforcement – Idaho Falls • RMCU – Returned Mail Consolidated Unit - Lewiston • CSCS – Child Support Customer Service (Contract Unit) - Boise • RCTG – Payment Receipting (Contract Unit) – Boise • CCM – Core Case Management - Statewide

  14. Tasks – Defining the Work • Caseload vs Workload • Functions vs Tasks • What is “The Work” • Balancing Priorities • Managing the Case • Shared Ownership • Targeted Objectives

  15. Caseload Equalization Note: Data is a “snapshot” in time and changes on a dialy basis

  16. Caseload vs Workload • Core Case Management Team Average Caseload = 1089/FTP Average Workload = 761/FTP

  17. Caseload Equalization:Core Case Management

  18. Workload Equalization:Core Case Management

  19. People – The Workers • Participation in the Planning • Matching Skills to Assignments • Offering Choices • No Involuntary Transfers • No Layoffs • No Reclassifications

  20. Technology – Automated Systems • Processes defined Automation (Pre-1996) • Automation redefined Processes (1996) • Redefining Processes to Maximize use of available Automated Systems (1996 to Present) • Enhancing Systems to Support Processes (1996 to Present) • Implementing New Systems & Technologies (Now and into the Future)

  21. Performance – Quality Outcomes • Accuracy • Timeliness • Consistency • Standardization Quality Outcomes = Quality Customer Service

  22. Performance Metrics: ORDS Unit (Order Abstract & Debt Setup

  23. Performance Metrics: ORDS unit

  24. Performance Improvement: Order Abstract & Debt Setup • Prior to Re-engineering – it took 6 to 8 weeks to get an order setup on the system, delayed collections, increased arrears, inconsistent data entry • After Re-Engineering – 5 to 15 days to get an order setup on the system, more timely collections, containment of arrears, consistent data entry

  25. High Performance • From July 2006 through June 2007 most of the functional consolidated units are exceeding performance goals • Averaging 96-99% Accuracy • Averaging 96-100% Timeliness

  26. Performance Improvement: 2006 Idaho Child Support Federal Self-Assessment Report

  27. Cost Effectiveness Source Data: PSI FFY 2006 OCSE State Report – State Distribution

  28. Staffing, Training & Achieving Performance Goals • Cultivating Experts vs Expecting Everyone to Know Everything • Ramp-up Time to Achieve Productivity Goals Reduced – Days & Weeks vs Months & Years • Recruiting & Hiring for Specific Skills vs General Qualifications • Specialized Training for Functions & Tasks • Case Ownership vs Shared Accountability

  29. Planning & Implementation Develop a Comprehensive Plan • Identify & Include All Stakeholders • Collect Data • Define Objectives • Draft the Plan • Test Pilot Projects/Gather Data • Refine and Implement “The Plan” • Implementation - Big Bang vs Staged Transition • Monitor & Measure Results • Refine Processes - Continuous & Ongoing

  30. For More Information • Contact Tom Serich Program Manager, Statewide Operations Idaho Child Support Services State of Idaho – Department of Health & Welfare 450 West State St – 2nd Floor Boise, ID 83701 Ph: 208-334-6545 Email: sericht@dhw.idaho.gov

More Related