1 / 18

Bosnia and Herzegovina Conflict Analysis

Bosnia and Herzegovina Conflict Analysis. Steering Board Ambassadors/Board of Principles/ meeting Sarajevo, 8 October 2013. Overview. 1. Methodology 2. S tate of mind 3. Perception of problems Institutions and governance International Community enagegment 6 . Agents of change

hollye
Télécharger la présentation

Bosnia and Herzegovina Conflict Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bosnia and HerzegovinaConflict Analysis Steering Board Ambassadors/Board of Principles/ meeting Sarajevo, 8 October 2013

  2. Overview 1. Methodology 2. State of mind 3. Perception of problems • Institutions and governance • International Community enagegment 6. Agents of change 7.Citizen participation 8. Varying views with regard to B&H perspective (table) 9. Views of the past and reconcilliation 10. Vision of B&H 11. Security: likelyhood of violence 12. Focus grups: main issues 13. Conclusions

  3. Methodology • Multidimensional Questionnaire • Prism research Public Opinion Poll, May 7th to 22nd 2013; Research sample and size: • 1500respondents ; • 805 Bosniaks, 178 Croats and 462 Serbs; • 840 of the respondents live in rural, 660 in urban areas. • Desk review • Interviews and consultations • Interviews with key stakeholders • Focus groups, May 24 – June 4. 2013 : • Youth, working class, demobilized soldiers and women; • Over 50 participants in total from across BiH; • Facilitated and assisted by several local experts.

  4. 2. State of mind • 50.2%of the respondents describe their state of mind over the past year in negative terms (lethargic); • 12% satisfied, optimistic or content; • 52.2% feel their life is the same; • 39.6% worse than a year ago; • 49.3% expect it to be the same by the next year; • 33.1% worse by the next year.

  5. State of Mind

  6. 3. Perception of Problems • 72.4% of respondents see corruption as the main problem across the country; • 59% see economy as the main problem; • 50.5% see politics as the main problem;

  7. 4. Institutions and governance - Trust • 51.8% have confidence in the police; • 42.7% in religious leaders; • 28.6% trust international community • 24.4 % and 16.6 %trust entity and cantonal governments, and • 11.4 % trust the politicians, • Only one in 10 citizens trust local politicians.

  8. Institutions and governance: Levels of trust

  9. 5. International Community engagement • Active engagement: 69.6% (FB&H) 71.5% (Bosniak) 25.3% (RS) 18.2% (Serb) 57.4% (BD) 61.3% (Croat) • No engagement: 9.6% (FB&H) 11.2%(Bosniak) 48.8% (RS) 52.4%(Serb) 11.7% (BD) 11.4%(Croat)

  10. 6. Agents of change • 63.0%youth • 50.5% citizens • 26.1 % intellectuals • 24.2%international community • 53.0% support active international engagement.

  11. 7. Citizen participation Disinterest in actively participating in changing the society: • 53.85 %willing to vote in the elections; • 34.5 % willing to leave the country; • 31.1 %would demonstrate; • 16.7%willing to join acitizens’ action group; • 14.5% a political party; • 6.6%ready to use force or violence if necessary.

  12. 8. Varying views with regard to B&H`s EU perspective

  13. 9. Views of the past and reconcilliation Ethnic groups have starkly different views of the past conflict: • 39.7% of the respondents believe that there has been reconciliation in BiH; • 13 % believe that reconcilliation is possible; • 73% would prefer to live in communities dominated by their own ethic group.

  14. 10. Vision of B&H • 71.9%of Serbs and 53.6% Croats wish to live in independent mono-ethnic entities; • 36.7%of Bosniaks desire to live in B&H within its current borders, • 20.6% of them wish to live in an independent Bosniak entity; • 28.5% of them accept living inB&H within it‘s current borderds and entities.

  15. 11. Security: likelyhood of violence • 2/3 believe that the outbreak of new armed conflict in the Balkan region is not likely in the next 5 years; • 35.7 % from all ethnic groups think that there could be some violence (criminal acts, violent protests, separate ethnic incidents,broader ethnic conflict); • Likelihood of B&H not splitting peacefully? • 58.8 % Bosniaks • 55% Croats • 44.7% Serbs

  16. Security: likelyhood of violenceIf integrity of BiH was threatened… Use peaceful means • 54.4%Bosniaks • 45% Croats • 30.6% Serbs Willing to take up arms • 13.5%Bosniaks • 12.6% Croats and • 1.5% Serbs Not engage at all • 28.4%Bosniaks, • 40.1% Croats and • 64.9% Serbs would not engage in any way.

  17. 12. Focus groups: main issues • Democratic process: high level of election fraud; • Corruption as a parallel system, more trusted than administration; • Heavily dependent on the international community.

  18. 13. Conclusions • Lethargy prevents change • Citizens passive, unless threatened… • But majority feel their ethnic group still being threatened • Wrong perception of international engagement • Crisis of common identity and all levels of society (that no constitutional reform can fix) • Future uncertain and unpredictable

More Related