1 / 27

Presentation Outline

Contemplative Leaders in Action… a program for emerging leaders Jesuit Collaborative Fordham, June, 2009. Presentation Outline. The program (target audience, program structure, implementation) Our experience to date Open forum discussion. The program mission:.

holmes-hull
Télécharger la présentation

Presentation Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Contemplative Leaders in Action…a program for emerging leadersJesuit CollaborativeFordham, June, 2009

  2. Presentation Outline • The program (target audience, program structure, implementation) • Our experience to date • Open forum discussion

  3. The program mission: “….to nurture emerging, Christ-centered leaders so that they can impact society.”

  4. The program = one response to a daunting challenge: “Unless religious leaders take young adults more seriously, the future of American religion is in doubt.” (Robert Wuthnow, After the Baby Boomers)

  5. Program participants:Who we were after…How we looked….What we found…

  6. The target demographic for our pilot: • Christian men and women, aged approximately 25 to 35 • Employed in marketplace, church, government, non-profit • Demonstrated leadership potential and faith commitment ….Jesuit school grads a prime but not exclusive niche

  7. Over a two-year period, the cohort would commit to: • A monthly evening meeting • An annual weekend retreat • Opportunity for mentoring and/or for spiritual direction • Involvement in service work = balancing real commitment against their “time famine”

  8. We sought a manageable number of “high probability” nominees, approaching: • Presidents of metro NY Jesuit high schools • Pastors of metro NY Jesuit parishes • Campus ministry and other contacts at Jesuit universities • Alpha Sigma Nu • Jesuit Volunteer Corps • CLC and other “networkers”

  9. The application process: • We received about 50-60 nominee names/email addresses • About 25-30 of these completed a short application form and were interviewed • We accepted 19

  10. The first cohort was wonderfully, but not Platonically, diverse: • Gender balanced • Rather more single than married • Racially and ethnically diverse—but no Hispanic! • Highly accomplished in diverse occupations [Heavy on finance and law (this is NYC, after all!), but no healthcare and no religious] • Virtually all Catholic

  11. Program Architecture: Spiritual and WorldlyJesuitSelf-sustaining

  12. Provide spiritual formation and leadership development, e.g.: • Learning prayer techniques • Learning about self via personality inventories and group dynamics • Praying together • Researching and discussing critical social issues • Discussing leadership theory

  13. Through a “secular” lens, the program is a strategy for self-leadership: • Know yourself, including strengths and weaknesses • Develop a point of view on the world • Figure out where you want to lead (a sense of mission and vision) • Acquire skills and tools that help you go there

  14. Through a “spiritual” lens, the program draws heavily from the Spiritual Exercises: • Learn and practice the Examen • Learn the “technology” of Ignatian discernment • Reflect on current reality of self and world (“First Week”) • Articulate personal purpose and mission (“Kingdom” and “Second Week” themes) • Embrace the practice of an annual retreat

  15. Why the program ideally fits Jesuit culture, tradition, mission: • Help the Church reach a critical yet neglected population • Help create a “Jesuit network” in major cities • Accompany adults in their prime life-decision years (for centuries, a Jesuit hallmark) • Track high-potential Jesuit grads through the “lost decade” of young adulthood

  16. Why the program fits (cont.): The program beneficiaries, “will grow up to be….civic officials, and will fill other important posts to everybody’s profit and advantage.” (Fr. Polanco, justifying the education ministry)

  17. Design challenges we faced (and face): • Quickly getting down the “cost curve” to sustainability • Replicability: designing modules that don’t depend on specific experts • Balancing spiritual and worldly: we are doing something new, aiming for the “uncomfortable middle” • Balancing participant leadership in molding content vs. our design goals

  18. The bottom line: How do we implement it?

  19. Key steps toward a successful September start-up: • Form a stakeholder/steering group • Find a space • Find a facilitator • Find funding

  20. A hypothetical September launch (continued): • Invite campus ministers, high school presidents, pastors, etc to nominate candidates (April 1) • Invite candidates to apply (mid April) • Conduct info sessions/applicant screening (mid May) • By early June, confirm participants, inform them of Fall meeting dates, etc

  21. What did we learn? • Opening retreat critically important: bonding, trust-building, program definition, etc • Regular attendance important: Quicker “in or out” decisions for those who miss meetings • Optimal size? • We started with 19 • 12-15 better if the ‘economics’ work

  22. What did we learn? • Participants strongly valued community, network, spiritual “tools” • A month between sessions is a long time more homework? social or other events? spiritual “check in” emails? catch up the person who missed?

  23. What did we learn? • We probably tried to cover too much—go for a bit more depth

  24. What we learned---ideas the percolated: • Use ‘sub-committees’ to arrange social dimension, structure service project, etc? • Meet in someone’s home occasionally? • Meet informally with one or another Jesuit (I.e. the group wants to be part of this ‘family’ or ‘network’)

  25. Our vision: we imagine national/international replications where: • Veteran participants mentor junior ones • Participants become both “spiritual friends” and a business and social network • The program co-sponsors lectures, prayer, etc for the “Jesuit community” of a city: building Jesuit identity beyond institutional allegiance • Across cities and world, program participants feel a common bond, made tangible on-line and through conferences

  26. The big picture: where do we go from here • 2008/9 = New York • 2009/10 + Boston and Philadelphia • 2010/11 + 4 to 6 more cities? (Chicago, Cleveland, Syracuse, Dublin, Melbourne, Seattle, Santiago/Chile)

  27. Where do we go from here: • Systematic marketing in 2009/2010 • Program materials on-line by end-2009 • “Practitioners Network” by Fall, ’09 • Participant Network by Fall, ’09 • Codify the “non-negotiables” of a CLIA program by early 2010 • Begin thinking beyond year two

More Related