1 / 20

Outline

Health Cognitions Bill Klein Department of Psychology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Mind-Body Center Summer Institute June 5, 2008. Outline. Health Cognitions and Physical Health Health Cognitions Attitudes and knowledge Social cognitions Perceived vulnerability

hop
Télécharger la présentation

Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Health CognitionsBill KleinDepartment of PsychologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh Mind-Body CenterSummer InstituteJune 5, 2008

  2. Outline • Health Cognitions and Physical Health • Health Cognitions • Attitudes and knowledge • Social cognitions • Perceived vulnerability • Perceived control/efficacy • Behavioral intentions • Mental representations of illness • Attribution and blame

  3. Cognitions and Behavior • Leading causes of death are behavioral (e.g., smoking, alcohol use, nutrition, high risk sex) • Need to understand cognitions that underlie these behaviors in order to change them • Health Behavior Models • Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen & Madden, 1986) • Health Belief Model (Janz & Becker, 1984) • Protection Motivation Theory (Rogers, 1983) • Stage Models: Transtheoretical Model (Prochaska, DiClemente, & Norcross, 1992); Precaution Adoption Process Model (Weinstein et al., 1998)

  4. Theory of Planned Behavior Attitudes Intentions Behavior Subjective Norms PBC

  5. Problems with Models • Cross-sectional • Role of environmental constraints and temptations • Past behavior • Interactions and paths often not specified

  6. Attitudes and Knowledge • Knowledge • Perceived costs and benefits • Framing health messages (Rothman & Salovey, 1997) • Affective orientation toward behavior • Cognitive dissonance • Induced hypocrisy (Stone et al., 1994) • Defensive processing of health messages • Fear appeals (Hovland et al., 1953) • Perceived threat (Croyle et al., 1993) • Perceived credibility (Liberman & Chaiken, 1992) • Self-affirmation (Sherman et al., 2000)

  7. Social Cognitions • Subjective norms • Injunctive vs. descriptive norms • Perceived prevalence/social comparison • False consensus and false uniqueness (Suls et al., 1988) • Norm misperception (Prentice & Miller, 1993) • Threatening social comparisons (Klein & Kunda, 1993) • Prototype perception • Adolescent prototypes (Gibbons et al., 1998) • Stereotypes (Weinstein, 1980) • Self-presentation • Appearance vs. health (Mahler et al., 2003)

  8. Perceived Vulnerability I • Conceptualization • Perceived risk (absolute and comparative), perceived probability, perceived likelihood, unrealistic optimism • Role of affect (e.g., “feeling at risk” and regret) • Lay problems with risk estimation • Use of probability (e.g., small vs. large, 50/50 ≠ 50%)

  9. Perceived Risk of Breast Cancer (Lipkus, Klein, Skinner, & Rimer, 2005)

  10. Perceived Vulnerability I • Conceptualization • Perceived risk (absolute and comparative), perceived probability, perceived likelihood, unrealistic optimism • Role of affect (e.g., “feeling at risk” and regret) • Lay problems with risk estimation • Use of probability (e.g., small vs. large, 50/50 ≠ 50%) • Use of heuristics (availability heuristic, base rate fallacy)

  11. Illusory Correlation

  12. Perceived Vulnerability I • Conceptualization • Perceived risk (absolute and comparative), perceived probability, perceived likelihood, unrealistic optimism • Role of affect (e.g., “feeling at risk” and regret) • Lay problems with risk estimation • Use of probability (e.g., small vs. large, 50/50 ≠ 50%) • Use of heuristics (availability heuristic, base rate fallacy) • Matching percentages to labels

  13. EC Verbal Labels (Berry, Raynor, & Knapp, 2006)

  14. EC Verbal Labels (Berry, Raynor, & Knapp, 2006)

  15. Perceived Vulnerability II • Relation to health outcomes • Mammography (McCaul et al., 1996): r = .16 across samples; r = .33 among women with a family history • Condom use (Gerrard et al., 1996) • Processing health information (Radcliffe & Klein, 2002) • Methodological concerns (Weinstein et al., 1998)

  16. Perceived Control/Efficacy • Control perceptions (Langer & Rodin, 1977) • Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977) • Response efficacy (Rogers, 1983) • Perceived behavioral control (Ajzen, 1991) • Health locus of control (Wallston, 1992) • Biases in control perceptions • Illusion of control (Langer, 1975) • Comparative perceptions (Klein & Kunda, 1994)

  17. Drug Problem Imagine you are making a choice between the following two drug treatments for reducing heart attack risk: Drug A has lung-related side effects 1 out of every 100,000 times. However, when these side effects occur, they are instantly fatal. Overall, then, there is a 1 in 100,000 chance of a fatality if you take this drug. Drug B has lung-related side effects 4 out of every 100,000 times. However, when they occur, there are measures you can take to avoid becoming a fatality. The side effects lead to death about 50% of the time. Overall, then, there is a 2 in 100,000 chance of a fatality. Which drug do you prefer? ________ Klein & Kunda, 1994

  18. Behavioral Intentions • Intentions (Ajzen & Madden, 1986) • Protection motivation (Rogers, 1983) • Willingness (Gibbons et al., 1998) • Contemplation (Prochaska et al., 1992)

  19. Illness Cognition I • Illness Representations (Meyer, Leventhal, & Guttman, 1985) • Cause, consequence, timeline, identity, control • Acute vs. chronic illness • Age differences (Gump et al., 2001) • Unrealistic pessimism regarding coping (Blanton et al., 2001); affective forecasting

  20. Illness Cognition II • Attribution (Seligman, 1975) • Global, stable, internal attributions for negative events associated with earlier illness onset and mortality (e.g., U. S. Presidents, Hall of Fame baseball players) • Characterological blame worse than behavioral blame over time (e.g., Glinder & Compas, 1999) • Counterfactual thinking might promote less adaptive coping (Roese & Olson, 1995)

More Related