1 / 9

Chair's Conclusions and Focus for Next Year: Enhancing Collaboration on HM, POPs, and PM Reporting

This document outlines the key conclusions and focus areas for the upcoming year as discussed in the meeting. Emphasis is placed on enhancing scientific reviews and follow-ups related to Heavy Metals (HM), Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), and Particulate Matter (PM). Recommendations include a proposed timetable for revising reporting guidelines to improve harmonization and transparency, as well as capacity-building initiatives. Synergies with the UNFCCC process will be encouraged, and feedback is solicited for improvements in reporting templates and methodologies.

howard-walker
Télécharger la présentation

Chair's Conclusions and Focus for Next Year: Enhancing Collaboration on HM, POPs, and PM Reporting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Draft meeting conclusions From the chairs

  2. Focus next year • HM/POPs • Scientific • Review • PM follow up • Updates • Task group, ancillary data • Possible link to NEC directive revision and LRTAP negotiations • Capacity building

  3. Reporting • Will propose for next meeting a time table for revisions of reporting guidelines • Taking into account need for further harmonisation • MSC-W is encouraged to further develope REPdab and WEBdab • Options for NFR extensions • To increase transparency • In particular for HM, POPs and PM • Proposed as additional reporting (not requirements)

  4. Review • Agreed to have an annual review procedure • Some Parties expressed concerns with resource requirements, that will be brought forward • Encourge synergies with UNFCCC process, • Timing and common data • Agreed on a procedures, methods and timing, including consultations with Parties, feedback and resubmissions of data for a S&A • Annexed to chairs report • Report to EMEP SB

  5. Review (cont.) • IIR • Short-term: integrate into templates certain aspect (notation keys, explanation and fuel issues) • Not required as minimum reporting • Suggestions on draft format. Comments welcome within 19.11 to KK. Will be available for use. • Agreed on improvements of the templates • Prefilled Nas • Clarifications on notation keys • New totals according to WGSR • New memo item for inland shipping • Options for aggregating 1A and 1B

  6. Review (cont.) • Will explore options for detailed review models • Taking into account other processes, e.g. UNFCCC and twinning projects/share of experience • Cost-effectiveness! • Recognised the need for review both for monitoring progress towards targets and policy development

  7. PM workshop • The TF appreciated the input from the workshop • Pointed out needs for updating the GB, especially missing sectors • Resource needs for these updates • PM Task group to assess for modeller needs

  8. Guidebook • Need for resources • PM demands • IPCC demand for updates • Needs to follow the pace of increased reporting requirenents • EFDB • Further exploring the prospects of developing an EFs or linking to existing initiatives • Need for link to EPER PRTR processes • Methodologies, reporting and dissemination

  9. Capacity building • Need to identify obstacle in some countries • Financial and institutional • Need further consideration • Twinning projects • Training • Link to review process • Consider funding to bring countries together before next meeting

More Related