1 / 18

OPeNDAP Present and Future

OPeNDAP Present and Future. An Overview Encompassing Current Projects & Potential New Directions Dave Fulker and James Gallagher. Rough Outline. Background OPULS (an OPeNDAP-Unidata collaboration) DAP4 (to supersede DAP2) Experimental extensions ( Async access, UGRID subsets)

howie
Télécharger la présentation

OPeNDAP Present and Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OPeNDAP Present and Future An Overview Encompassing Current Projects & Potential New DirectionsDave Fulker and James Gallagher

  2. Rough Outline • Background • OPULS (an OPeNDAP-Unidata collaboration) • DAP4 (to supersede DAP2) • Experimental extensions (Async access, UGRID subsets) • Hyrax over Amazon/S3 • Elaboration on server functions • Perhaps binning, masking, a functional language? • Relationship to WPS & other Web services • Hyrax (& WCS) in OWS-9 OPeNDAP, Inc.

  3. Origins • Scientists (ocean fluxes & temps) envisaged use of http for remote data access (1993) • Collaboration with the designer of the JGOFS data system… • Led to Distributed Ocean Data System (DODS) • DODS later was renamed OPeNDAP (to be explained momentarily…) OPeNDAP, Inc.

  4. OPeNDAP Now Is: • An acronym • “Open-source Project for a Network Data Access Protocol” • Often a synonym for “DAP” • A not-for-profit corp. developing/supporting • “DAPx” - a web-services protocol for data access • Deployed by hundreds of data providers internationally • Employed in many analysis packages (MATLAB, e.g.) • Designated a “Community Standard” by NASA • Server & client implementations* of DAP *Note: there are other implementations

  5. Available Software • Free end-user applications that include DAP support: panoply, idv, nco, … • Commercial: IDL, Matlab, ArcGIS • SDKs: The netCDF C and Java libraries; OC; libdap; Java OPeNDAP, PyDAP • Each of these provides its own API and they span C, C++, Java and Python • Data serves: PyDAP, Hyrax, TDS, … OPeNDAP, Inc.

  6. Concept: Clients Get Just the Data They Need, as They Need them • Accessing data via URLs (i.e., URL = dataset) • Appending query strings to subset or run server functions • Getting responses of two (general) types: • Metadata - dataset descriptions & catalogs (textual) • Content - values and metadata (binary or textual) • Using responses in diverse ways, e.g. • MATLAB maps responses to its internal math types • netCDF library allows apps to work as though reading a local file

  7. NOAA grant forOPeNDAP-Unidata Linked Servers (OPULS) • Goal 1: conformance & linkage between OPeNDAP & Unidata DAP-servers, with short-term outcomes: • New data-model & protocol specs: DAP4 • Consistent behaviors of OPeNDAP & Unidata servers • Data-type richness (NetCDF4, HDF5, RDBs) • Extensions (i.e., new server behaviors): • Irregular-mesh subsetting • Asynchronous access • Goal 2: common framework for OPeNDAP & Unidata servers, aiming for an architecture that • Underpins the unique strengths of both • Reduces likelihood of redundant effort

  8. OPULS Progress So Far • Draft of DAP4 data model & protocol specs • Sufficient for the full richness of NetCDF-4 and HDF-5 files (including “Groups,” e.g.) • Progress on rigorous conformance-testing • Successful extensibility experiments • Irregular-mesh (i.e., UGRID) subsetting • Asynchronous access (as may be useful for near-line data storage) • Amazon cloud deployment (more later…)

  9. Other technologies OPULS considered • JSON responses as an alternative to XML • Decided they added too much bulk to the specification and two many requirements for implementers • Could be added in a future version • Can be built using XSLT from DAP4 XML • OpenSearch • Not incorporated into DAP4 for many of the same reasons • The DAP4 metadata response specifically includes support for these OPeNDAP, Inc.

  10. OPULS and Feedback • OPULS is ready for community feedback • Design documents are online • Web site: http://docs.opendap.org/ • The current draft specification is there as well • Many features are already available in C++ and C implementations OPeNDAP, Inc.

  11. Hyrax over Amazon/S3 • Exploits a natural fit between DAP-based services and cloud services • Initial progress already achieved under the OPULS grant • Bears interesting similarities to the challenge of asynchronous data access • May yield a new community of OPeNDAP users OPeNDAP, Inc.

  12. More about clouds… • Hyrax is trivial to run on the Amazon cloud • We are looking at ways to work with data held in S3 • S3 characteristics: • Flat; • Modest response times; • Simple GET/PUT type API OPeNDAP, Inc.

  13. Using S3 • Tried S3 file systems – found them wanting • Not interoperable (hardly surprising, but limiting) • Extra layer to software stack • Now working with XML ‘catalogs’ • XML documents create a faux hierarchy • XML + XSLT  HTML (i.e., a ‘free’ web interface) • XML + Hyrax + caching  DAP access • The XML is very similar to THREDDS catalogs OPeNDAP, Inc.

  14. Elaboration on Server Functions • Proposition: the future of OPeNDAP may lie in provision of data-proximate (i.e., server-side) functions that: • Deliver precisely defined subsets • Reduce the number of off-target retrievals • I.e., enable querying of complex dataset properties • Remap/transform data to simplify data use, especially multi-source data integration • Effective caching will be required OPeNDAP, Inc.

  15. Server Functions, DAP4 • DAP2 supports functions and functional composition • Currently, DAP4 treats ‘functions’ and a ‘functional language’ as an extension • DAP4 provides more complete support for functions, including metadata responses (DAP2 does not provide this; a gap in the DAP2 specification) • Support for POST OPeNDAP, Inc.

  16. Server Functions, experimentation • UGrid: Unstructured Grid (irregular mesh) subsetting • We have implemented a clone of the GDS server’s syntax for functions • Enables current netCDF-based DAP clients (e.g., ECMF) to use the Ugrid function • Other projects: Multi-instrument inter-calibration OPeNDAP, Inc.

  17. Some Server-Function Ideas • Binning: returns a distribution (as a raster of boolean values on a user-specified grid) of data values satisfying some criteria • Masking: accepts a raster of zero/nonzero values as a query argument, perhaps as a geospatial selection criterion, e.g. • Perhaps some (limited?) form of functional language for very rich capabilities • WPS, et al. OPeNDAP, Inc.

  18. Summary • DAP is based on a domain neutral data model and an expression-based constraint language • While not ‘RESTful’ in the strictest sense, it is a REST design in spirit (DAP predates the term by several years) • OPULS is a collaborative project between OPeNDAP and Unidata that intends to update DAP • We are also running several experimental mini-projects within its context: • Asynchronous access, Unstructured Grid access, Cloud computing and an expanded, function-based, server-side processing system • DAP servers provide a good platform on which to build OGC web services, as described in the following presentation. OPeNDAP, Inc.

More Related