1 / 124

Watershed Impact Assessment in Chesapeake Bay: Isolating Geographic Influence

This study aims to understand which basins affect specific areas of Chesapeake Bay and by how much through isolation scenarios. Set criteria levels for Susquehanna and other watersheds, record changes in attainment, and analyze results. Results are provisional due to varying basin characteristics and size differences. Some rules apply for presentation and considerations for final model applications are noted.

iden
Télécharger la présentation

Watershed Impact Assessment in Chesapeake Bay: Isolating Geographic Influence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Geographic Isolation Scenarios

  2. Purpose • Understand which basins affect which areas of the bay and by how much

  3. Procedure • Set the Susquehanna at Tier 3 loads and all other watersheds at 2000 levels • Record the relative change in attainment for each criterion and designated use area • Repeat for each basin

  4. Progress • All basins completed • Incorporated improvements in process • Results are provisional

  5. Why Still Provisional • Small changes difficult to compare to large changes • Different basins have different N:P:Sed ratios

  6. Presentation Rules • Do not show normalized results for Patuxent or ESVA. • Do not consider changes below a particular threshold to be significant • CL spring = 0.0011 • CL summer = 0.005 • KE = 0.0006

  7. Other Considerations • Final criteria curves not implemented • Final model applications areas not decided • Final designated use boundaries and clarity depths not decided

  8. Results • Problems (red areas) • Who has biggest impact • Who has biggest relative effectiveness

More Related